A Three Elements Vector Valued Structure’s Ultimate Strength-Strong Motion-Intensity Measure

This article presents an alternative collapse capacity intensity measure in the three elements form which is influenced by the spectral ordinates at periods longer than that of the first mode period at near and far source sites. A parameter, denoted by β, is defined by which the spectral ordinate effects, up to the effective period (2T1), on the intensity measure are taken into account. The methodology permits to meet the hazard-levelled target extreme event in the probabilistic and deterministic forms. A MATLAB code is developed involving OpenSees to calculate the collapse capacities of the 8 archetype RC structures having 2 to 20 stories for regression process. The incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) method is used to calculate the structure’s collapse values accounting for the element stiffness and strength deterioration. The general near field set presented by FEMA is used in a series of performing nonlinear analyses. 8 linear relationships are developed for the 8structutres leading to the correlation coefficient up to 0.93. A collapse capacity near field prediction equation is developed taking into account the results of regression processes obtained from the 8 structures. The proposed prediction equation is validated against a set of actual near field records leading to a good agreement. Implementation of the proposed equation to the four archetype RC structures demonstrated different collapse capacities at near field site compared to those of FEMA. The reasons of differences are believed to be due to accounting for the spectral shape effects.




References:
[1] A. J. Papazoglou, and A. S. Elnashai, “Analytical and field evidence of
the damaging effect of vertical earthquake ground motion,” Earthquake
Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 25, 1996, pp.1109–1137.
[2] S. J. Kim, and A. S. Elnashai, “Seismic assessment of RC structures
considering vertical ground motion,” MAE Center Report No. 08-03,
Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois, Urbana
Champagne, IL, 2008.
[3] J. W. Baker, and C. A. Cornell, “Vector-valued intensity measures for
pulse-like near-fault ground motions,” Engineering Structures, vol.
30(4), 2008, pp. 1048-1057.
[4] J. W. Baker, and C. A. Cornell, “Spectral shape, epsilon and record
selection,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol.
35(9), 2006, pp. 1077-1095.
[5] Champion, Casey, and A. Liel. “The effect of near-fault directivity on
building seismic collapse risk,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural
Dynamics, 2012. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.1188.
[6] C. B. Haselton, J. W. Baker, A. B. Liel, and G. G. Deierlein,
“Accounting for GroundMotion Spectral Shape Characteristics in
Structural Collapse Assessment through an Adjustment for Epsilon.”
Journal of Structural Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers,
vol. 137(3), 2011, pp. 332–344. [7] FEMA P695. Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2009.
[8] P. Tothong, C. A. Cornell, and J. W. Baker, “Explicit Directivity-Pulse
Inclusion in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis,” Earthquake
Spectra; vol. 23(4), 2007, pp. 867–891.
[9] J. W. Baker, and C. A. Cornell, “A vector-valued ground motion
intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon,”
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 34(10), 2005a,
pp.1193–217.
[10] N. Luco, and C. A. Cornell, “Structure-specific scalar intensity measures
for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions,” Earthquake
Spectra, vol. 23(2), 2007, pp. 357–92.
[11] C. B. Haselton, and J. W. Baker, “Ground motion intensity measures for
collapse capacity prediction: Choice of optimal spectral period and
effect of spectral shape,: in 8th National Conference on Earthquake
Engineering, 2006. San Francisco, California.
[12] C. Goulet, C. B. Haselton, J. Mitrani-Reiser, J. Beck, G. G. Deierlein,.
A. Porter, and J. Stewart, “Evaluation of the Seismic Performance of a
Code-Conforming Reinforced-Concrete Frame Building - from Seismic
Hazard to Collapse Safety and Economic Losses,” Earthquake
Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 36(13), 2007, pp.1973-1997.
[13] J. W. Baker, and C. A. Cornell, “Vector-valued ground motion intensity
measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis,” Report #150.
Stanford (CA): John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center; 2005b.
321p.
[14] A. Nicknam, and Y. Eslamian, “A hybrid method for simulating nearsource,
broadband seismograms: Application to the 2003 Bam
earthquake (Mw 6.5)”, Tectonophysics, vol. 487, No. 1, 2010, pp. 46-
58.
[15] A. Nicknam, and Y. Eslamian, “An EGF-based methodology for
predicting compatible seismograms in the spectral domain using GA
technique,” Geophysical Journal International, vol. 185, No. 1, 2011,
pp. 557- 573.
[16] A. Nicknama, M. Issab, A. Yazdanic, S. Yaghmaei-Sabeghd, and Y.
Eslamian, “Predicting Seismogram at Far Source Site Using Omega-
Squared Source Spectrum Model”, Journal of Earthquake Engineering,
Vol. 16, No. 1, 2012, pp. 105- 124.
[17] P. G. Somerville, N. F. Smith, R. W. Graves, and N. A. Abrahamson,
“Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to
include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity,”
Seismological Research Letters, vol. 68(1), 1997, pp. 199–222.
[18] N. A. Abrahamson, “Effects of rupture directivity on probabilistic
seismic hazard analysis,” Paper presented at the sixth international
conference seismic zonation, Oakland, California, 2000.
[19] S. Shahi and J. W. Baker. “An empirically calibrated framework for
including the effects of near-fault directivity in probabilistic seismic
hazard analysis,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol.
101(2), 2011, pp. 742–755.
[20] M. Yousefi and T. Taghikhany, “Incorporation of directivity effect in
probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and disaggregation of Tabriz city,”
Nat Hazards, vol. 73, 2014, pp. 277–301.
[21] N. A. Abrahamson, and W. J. Silva, “Empirical response spectral
attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquake,” Seismological
Research Letters, vol. 68(1), 1997, pp. 94-126.
[22] F. McKenna, G. L. Fenves, and M. H. Scott, OpenSees: open system for
earthquake engineering simulation, Pacific Earthquake Engineering
Research Center. University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2004.
[23] L. F. Ibarra, R. A. Medina, and H. Krawinkler, “Hysteretic models that
incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration,” Earthquake
Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 34(12), 2005, pp. 1489–
1151.