A Strategic Evaluation Approach for Defining the Maturity of Manufacturing Technologies

Due to dynamic evolution, the ability of a manufacturing technology to produce a special product is changing. Therefore, it is essential to monitor the established techniques and processes to detect whether a company-s production will fit future circumstances. Concerning the manufacturing technology planning process, companies must decide when to change to a new technology for maintaining and increasing competitive advantages. In this context, the maturity assessment of the focused technologies is crucial. This article presents an approach for defining the maturity of a manufacturing technology from a strategic point of view. The concept is based on the approach of technology readiness level (TRL) according to NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration), but also includes dynamic changes. Therefore, the model takes into account the concept of the technology life cycle. Furthermore, it enables a company to estimate the ideal date for implementation of a new manufacturing technology.

Authors:

• G. Reinhart
• S. Schindler

Keywords:

• Maturity Assessment
• Manufacturing Technology Planning
• Technology Life Cycle
• Technology Readiness Level.

References:

[1] M. F. Zaeh, G. Reinhart, J. Pohl, S. Schindler, F. Karl, C. Rimpau,
"Modelling, Anticipating and Managing Cyclic Behaviour in Industry,"
In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Changeable,
Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production (CARV), Munich, 2009,
Germany, 5th-7th October, pp. 16-43.
[2] H. J. Bullinger, "Fokus Technologie - Chancen erkennen - Leistungen
entwickeln," Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich, Vienna 2008.
[3] G. Reinhart, S. Schindler, J. Pohl, C. Rimpau, "Cycle-Oriented
Manufacturing Technology Chain Planning," In: Proceedings of the 3rd
International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and
Virtual Production (CARV), Munich, 2009, Germany, 5th-7th October,
pp. 702-711.
[4] D. Ford, C. Ryan, "Taking technology to market," Harvard Business
Review, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 117-126, 1981.
[5] R. N. Forster, "Innovation - The Attacker-s Advantage," Summit Books,
New York, 1986.
[6] M. E. Porter, "Competition in Global Industries," Harvard Business
School Press, Boston, 1986.
[7] J. Milberg J, S. Mueller, "Integrated configuration and holistic
evaluation of technology chains within process planning," Production
Engineering Research and Development, Springer, vol. 1, pp 401-406,
2007.
[8] G. Reinhart, P. Krebs, M. F. Zaeh, "Fuzzy Logic-based Integration of
Qualitative Uncertainties into Monetary Factory Evaluations," In:
Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Control
Automation (ICCA-09), Christchurch, 2009, New Zealand, pp. 385-391.
[9] B. Wördenweber, W. Wickord, "Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement
im Unternehmen - Methoden, Praxistipps und Softwaretools,"
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2004.
[10] J. C. Mankins, "Technology Readiness Level - A White Paper,"
Advanced Concepts Office, Office of Space Access and Technology,
1995.
[11] W. Eversheim, G. Schuh, "Betriebsh├╝tte - Produktion und
Management," Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1996.
[12] T. Tiefel, "Gewerbliche Schutzrechte im Innovationsprozess," Deutscher
Universitaetsverlag, Wiesbaden, 2007.
[13] E. B. Brousseau, R. Barton, S. Dimov, S. Bigot, "Technology maturity
assessment of micro and nano manufacturing processes," In: Proceedings
of the International Conferences on Multi-Material Micro Manufacture
(4M) / International Conferences on Micro Manufacturing (ICOMM-09),
Karlsruhe, 2009, Germany, pp. 257-262.