Determination and Assessment of Ground Motion and Spectral Parameters for Iran
Many studies have been conducted for derivation of
attenuation relationships worldwide, however few relationships have
been developed to use for the seismic region of Iranian plateau and
only few of these studies have been conducted for derivation of
attenuation relationships for parameters such as uniform duration.
Uniform duration is the total time during which the acceleration is
larger than a given threshold value (default is 5% of PGA). In this
study, the database was same as that used previously by Ghodrati
Amiri et al. (2007) with same correction methods for earthquake
records in Iran. However in this study, records from earthquakes with
MS< 4.0 were excluded from this database, each record has
individually filtered afterward, and therefore the dataset has been
expanded. These new set of attenuation relationships for Iran are
derived based on tectonic conditions with soil classification into rock
and soil. Earthquake parameters were chosen to be
hypocentral distance and magnitude in order to make it easier to use
the relationships for seismic hazard analysis. Tehran is the capital
city of Iran wit ha large number of important structures. In this study,
a probabilistic approach has been utilized for seismic hazard
assessment of this city. The resulting uniform duration against return
period diagrams are suggested to be used in any projects in the area.
[1] Ghodrati Amiri, G., Mahdavian, A. and Manouchehri Dana, F. (2007),
Attenuation Relationships for Iran, Journal of Earthquake Engineering,
11(4), 469-492.
[2] Ghodrati Amiri, G., Rokneddin, K., KarimpourFard, M.,
JafarianMarzouni, Y. and RazavianAmrei, S.A. (2006), Seismic hazard
assessment of southern Iran dry docks, 1st European Conference on
Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland .
[3] Jalali, A. and Hakimvand V. (2006), Effect of ground motion duration
on seismic response of steel MRF structures, 4th International
Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan.
[4] Naeim, F. (2001), the seismic design handbook, Second edition, Kluwer
Academic Publishers, United States of America.
[5] Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings
(2005) Standard No. 2800, Third Revision, Building & Housing
Research Center, Iran (In Persian)
[6] McGuire, R.M. (2001), Deterministic vs. Probabilistic Earthquake
Hazards and Risks, Journal of Soil Mechanics and Earthquake
Engineering, 21, 377-384 .
[7] Berberian, M., Ghoreishi, M., Ravesh, B.A., and Ashjaei, A.M., 1983,
Seismotectonic and Earthquake Fault Hazard Investigations in the
Tehran Region, Geological Survey of Iran, Report No. 56. (In Persian)
[8] Nowroozi, A., 1985, Empirical relations between magnitude and fault
parameters for earthquakes in Iran, Bulletin of the Siesmological Society
of America 75(5), 1327-1338.
[9] Iranian Geological Survey, http://www.ngdir.com.
[10] Berberian, M., 1994, Natural Hazards & the First Earthquake Catalogue
of Iran, Vol. 1: Historical Hazards in Iran Prior to 1900, International
Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, (IIEES).
[11] Nabavi, S.M., 1978, Historical earthquakes in Iran, 300BC - 1900 AD,
Journal of Earth and Space Physics 7, 70-117.
[12] Ambraseys, N.N. and Melville, C.P., 1982, A History of Persian
Earthquakes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Britain).
[13] Kijko, A., 2000, Statistical estimation of maximum regional earthquake
magnitude Mmax, Workshop of Seismicity Modeling in Seismic Hazard
Mapping, Poljce, Slovenia, Geological Survey, 1-10.
[14] Gardner, J. K. and Knopoff, L., 1974, Is the sequence of earthquake in
southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian?, Bulletin of
the Siesmological Society of America 64(5), 1363-1367.
[15] IRCOLD, Iranian Committee of Large Dams, 1994, Relationship
between MS and Mb , Internal Report. (In Persian)
[16] Cornell, C.A., 1968, Engineering seismic risk analysis, Bulletin of the
Siesmological Society of America 58(5), 1583-1606.
[17] Green, A.R. and Hall, W.J., 1994, An Overview of Selected Seismic
Hazard Analysis Methodologies, A Report on a Research Project,
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-
Champaign.
[18] Bender, B. and Perkins, D.M., 1987, SEISRISKΙΙΙ: A Computer
Program for Seismic Hazard Estimation, U.S. Geological Survey,
Bulletin 1772.
[19] Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings,
2005, Standard No.2800, Third Revision, Building & Housing Research
Center, Iran. (In Persian)
[1] Ghodrati Amiri, G., Mahdavian, A. and Manouchehri Dana, F. (2007),
Attenuation Relationships for Iran, Journal of Earthquake Engineering,
11(4), 469-492.
[2] Ghodrati Amiri, G., Rokneddin, K., KarimpourFard, M.,
JafarianMarzouni, Y. and RazavianAmrei, S.A. (2006), Seismic hazard
assessment of southern Iran dry docks, 1st European Conference on
Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland .
[3] Jalali, A. and Hakimvand V. (2006), Effect of ground motion duration
on seismic response of steel MRF structures, 4th International
Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan.
[4] Naeim, F. (2001), the seismic design handbook, Second edition, Kluwer
Academic Publishers, United States of America.
[5] Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings
(2005) Standard No. 2800, Third Revision, Building & Housing
Research Center, Iran (In Persian)
[6] McGuire, R.M. (2001), Deterministic vs. Probabilistic Earthquake
Hazards and Risks, Journal of Soil Mechanics and Earthquake
Engineering, 21, 377-384 .
[7] Berberian, M., Ghoreishi, M., Ravesh, B.A., and Ashjaei, A.M., 1983,
Seismotectonic and Earthquake Fault Hazard Investigations in the
Tehran Region, Geological Survey of Iran, Report No. 56. (In Persian)
[8] Nowroozi, A., 1985, Empirical relations between magnitude and fault
parameters for earthquakes in Iran, Bulletin of the Siesmological Society
of America 75(5), 1327-1338.
[9] Iranian Geological Survey, http://www.ngdir.com.
[10] Berberian, M., 1994, Natural Hazards & the First Earthquake Catalogue
of Iran, Vol. 1: Historical Hazards in Iran Prior to 1900, International
Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, (IIEES).
[11] Nabavi, S.M., 1978, Historical earthquakes in Iran, 300BC - 1900 AD,
Journal of Earth and Space Physics 7, 70-117.
[12] Ambraseys, N.N. and Melville, C.P., 1982, A History of Persian
Earthquakes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Britain).
[13] Kijko, A., 2000, Statistical estimation of maximum regional earthquake
magnitude Mmax, Workshop of Seismicity Modeling in Seismic Hazard
Mapping, Poljce, Slovenia, Geological Survey, 1-10.
[14] Gardner, J. K. and Knopoff, L., 1974, Is the sequence of earthquake in
southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian?, Bulletin of
the Siesmological Society of America 64(5), 1363-1367.
[15] IRCOLD, Iranian Committee of Large Dams, 1994, Relationship
between MS and Mb , Internal Report. (In Persian)
[16] Cornell, C.A., 1968, Engineering seismic risk analysis, Bulletin of the
Siesmological Society of America 58(5), 1583-1606.
[17] Green, A.R. and Hall, W.J., 1994, An Overview of Selected Seismic
Hazard Analysis Methodologies, A Report on a Research Project,
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-
Champaign.
[18] Bender, B. and Perkins, D.M., 1987, SEISRISKΙΙΙ: A Computer
Program for Seismic Hazard Estimation, U.S. Geological Survey,
Bulletin 1772.
[19] Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings,
2005, Standard No.2800, Third Revision, Building & Housing Research
Center, Iran. (In Persian)
@article{"International Journal of Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences:50572", author = "G. Ghodrati Amiri and M. Khorasani and Razavian Ameri and M.Mohamadi Dehcheshmeh and S.Fathi", title = "Determination and Assessment of Ground Motion and Spectral Parameters for Iran", abstract = "Many studies have been conducted for derivation of
attenuation relationships worldwide, however few relationships have
been developed to use for the seismic region of Iranian plateau and
only few of these studies have been conducted for derivation of
attenuation relationships for parameters such as uniform duration.
Uniform duration is the total time during which the acceleration is
larger than a given threshold value (default is 5% of PGA). In this
study, the database was same as that used previously by Ghodrati
Amiri et al. (2007) with same correction methods for earthquake
records in Iran. However in this study, records from earthquakes with
MS< 4.0 were excluded from this database, each record has
individually filtered afterward, and therefore the dataset has been
expanded. These new set of attenuation relationships for Iran are
derived based on tectonic conditions with soil classification into rock
and soil. Earthquake parameters were chosen to be
hypocentral distance and magnitude in order to make it easier to use
the relationships for seismic hazard analysis. Tehran is the capital
city of Iran wit ha large number of important structures. In this study,
a probabilistic approach has been utilized for seismic hazard
assessment of this city. The resulting uniform duration against return
period diagrams are suggested to be used in any projects in the area.", keywords = "Attenuation Relationships,Iran,Probabilistic Seismic
Hazard Analysis,Tehran, Uniform Duration", volume = "5", number = "10", pages = "550-5", }