When Explanations “Cause“ Error: A Look at Representations and Compressions

We depend upon explanation in order to “make sense" out of our world. And, making sense is all the more important when dealing with change. But, what happens if our explanations are wrong? This question is examined with respect to two types of explanatory model. Models based on labels and categories we shall refer to as “representations." More complex models involving stories, multiple algorithms, rules of thumb, questions, ambiguity we shall refer to as “compressions." Both compressions and representations are reductions. But representations are far more reductive than compressions. Representations can be treated as a set of defined meanings – coherence with regard to a representation is the degree of fidelity between the item in question and the definition of the representation, of the label. By contrast, compressions contain enough degrees of freedom and ambiguity to allow us to make internal predictions so that we may determine our potential actions in the possibility space. Compressions are explanatory via mechanism. Representations are explanatory via category. Managers are often confusing their evocation of a representation (category inclusion) as the creation of a context of compression (description of mechanism). When this type of explanatory error occurs, more errors follow. In the drive for efficiency such substitutions are all too often proclaimed – at the manager-s peril..

Authors:

• Michael Lissack

Keywords:

• Coherence
• Emergence
• Reduction
• Model

References:

[1] C. Bartel, and Garud, R., "The Role of Narratives in Sustaining
Organizational Innovation", Organization Science, 2009, 20: 107ÔÇÉ117.
[2] D. Berman, "So, What's Your Algorithm?", Wall Street Journal, January
4, 2012.
[3] J. S. Brown and Duguid, P. The Social Life of Information, 2000,
Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
[4] D. Bryant, http://www.arclight.net/~pdb/nonfiction/uncannyvalley.
html, 2006
[5] D. Hofstadler, Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies, 1995, New York,
Basic Books.
[6] D. Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow, New York, 2011, Farrar,
Straus and Giroux.
[7] R. Kalimo, Pahkin, K. &Mutanen, P., "Work and personal resources as
longterm predictors of wellÔÇÉbeing", Stress and Health, 2002, 18, 5, pp.
227-234.
[8] H. Letiche, &Lissack, M. (with Schultz, R.) Coherence in the Midst of
Complexity: Advances in Social Complexity Theory, 2011, New York,
Palgrave Macmillan
[9] M. Lissack, "Complexity is more than a Label: A look at Affordances
and Homologies," Keynote Speech at The 2nd International
MultiÔÇÉConference on Engineering and Technological Innovation: IMETI
2009 ,July 10th ÔÇÉ 13th, 2009 - Orlando, Florida, USA
[10] M. Lissack, & Richardson, K., "When Modeling Social Systems,
Models ÔÇÉ the Modeled: Reacting to Wolfram's A New Kind of Science",
2001, Emergence, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 95ÔÇÉ111.
[11] M. Lissack, & Richardson, K., "Models without morals: towards
the ethical use of business models", 2003, Emergence, Vol.5, No. 2,
pp 72ÔÇÉ102
[12] M. Lissack and J. Roos, The Next Common Sense: Mastering Corporate
Complexity through Coherence, 1999, London, Nicholas
BrealeyPublishing
[13] M. Mori, (1970). "Bukimi no tani, The uncanny valley" (K. F.
MacDorman& T. Minato, Trans.). Energy, 1970,7(4), 33-35. (Originally
in Japanese)
[14] M. Mori, The Buddha in the Robot, 1982, New York, Charles E. Tuttle
Co.
[15] J. Orr, "Sharing Knowledge, Celebrating Identity, Community Memory
in A Service Culture," in Middleton, D. and Edwards, D. (eds.),
Collective Remembering, 1990, London, Sage Publications, pp. 169-189
[16] B. Pentland, "Building process theory with narrative: From description
to explanation". Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24: 711ÔÇÉ724.
[17] R. Rosen, Anticipatory Systems, 1985, London, Pergamon
[18] SL Star &Griesemer JR, "Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and
Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of
Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39". Social Studies of Science, 1989, 19 (3):
387-420
[19] P. Thagard, Conceptual Revolutions, 1992, Princeton, NJ, Princeton U
Press
[20] P. Thagard, Coherence in Thought and Action, 2000, Cambridge, MA,
MIT Press.
[21] L. Vygotsky, Thought and language. edited and translated by Eugenia
Hanfmann and Gertrude Vakar, 1962, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press; NY:
John Wiley
[22] K. Weick, Sensemaking in organizations, 1995, Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications, Inc.
[23] H. White, "The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality",
Critical Inquiry, 1980, Vol. 7, No. 1, On Narrative (Autumn), pp. 5-27.
[24] A.J. Zellmer, Allen TFH, Kesseboehmer K., "The nature of ecological
complexity: A protocol for building the narrative", Ecological
Complexity, 2007, 3: 171-182