Value–based Group Decision on Support Bridge Selection
Value-based group decision is very complicated since many parties involved. There are different concern caused by differing preferences, experiences, and background. Therefore, a support system is required to enable each stakeholder to evaluate and rank the solution alternatives before engaging into negotiation with the other stakeholders. The support system is based on combination between value-based analysis, multi criteria group decision making based on satisfying options, and negotiation process based on coalition formation. This paper presents the group decision and negotiation on the selection of suitable material for a support bridge structure involving three decision makers, who are an estate manager, a project manager, and an engineer. There are three alternative solutions for the material of the support bridge structure, which are (a1) steel structure, (a2) reinforced concrete structure and (a3) wooden structure.
[1] J. Kelly and S. Male, Value Management in Design and Construction:
The Economic Management of Projects, London: Spon Press, 1993.
[2] G. Lin and Q. Shen, "Measuring the performance of value management
studies in construction: critical review," Journal of Management in
Engineering vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 2-9, 2007.
[3] S. Kraus, Strategic Negotiation in Multi-agent Environment, MA: MIT
Press, 2001.
[4] T. Wanyama, and B.H. Far, "A protocol for multi-agent negotiation in a
group-choice decision-making," Journal of Network and Computer
Applications, vol. 30, pp.1173-1195, 2007.
[5] W.C. Stirling, Satisfying Games and Decision Making with Applications
to Engineering and Computer Science. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2003.
[6] L. D. Miles, Techniques of Value Analysis and Engineering, 3rded. NY:
Eleanor Miles Walker, 1989.
[7] K. Yang, Voice of Customer, Capture and Analysis. NY: McGraw Hill
Proffesional, 2007.
[8] Kitamura, Y. and Mizoguchi, R, "An ontology of functional concept of
artefacts". AI-TR, no.1, 1999.
[9] J.J. Kaufman, Value Management: Creating Competitive Advantage.
Kent: Financial World Publishing, 2001.
[10] R. Woodhead, "Concepts of value in value management: the relationship
between function and value". Value World summer, SAVE International,
2007.
[11] C.W. Bytheway, FAST Creativity and Innovation: Rapidly Improving
Processes, Product Development and Solving Complex Problems.
Florida: J.Ross Publishing, 2007.
[12] J.J. Kaufman and R. Woodhead, Stimulating Innovation in Products and
Services with Function Analysis Mapping, New Jersey: John
Wiley&Sons. 2006.
[13] S.J. Kirk and A. Dell-Isola, Life Cycle Costing for Design Professionals,
2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
[14] P. Barringer, "A life cycle cost summary". The International conference
of Maintenance Societies. Maintenance Engineering Society of
Australia, Perth, 20-23 May, 2003.
[15] J.W. Bull, Life Cycle Cost for Construction, London: Blackie Academic
& Professional, 1993.
[16] H. Liu, V. Gopalkrishnan, K.T.N Quynh, W-K. Ng "Regression models
for estimating product life cycle cost". Journal of Intelligent
Manufacturing. Springer Science+Business Media. DOI
10.1007/s10845-008-0114-4, 2008.
[17] C. Utomo, A. Idrus, M. Napiah and M.F. Khamidi, "Agreement options
and coalition formation on value-based decision". Symposium on
Computational Intelligence in Multi criteria Decision-Making. IEEE
Society Nashville, TN, March 30 - April 2, 2009, pp.118-125.
[18] ASTM, ASTM Standards on Building Economics, 5th edition. ASTM
International, 2004.
[19] T.L. Saaty, "Decision making - the analytical hierarchy process and
network process (AHP/ANP)", Journal of System Science and System
Engineering, vol.13, no.1, pp.1-34, 2004.
[1] J. Kelly and S. Male, Value Management in Design and Construction:
The Economic Management of Projects, London: Spon Press, 1993.
[2] G. Lin and Q. Shen, "Measuring the performance of value management
studies in construction: critical review," Journal of Management in
Engineering vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 2-9, 2007.
[3] S. Kraus, Strategic Negotiation in Multi-agent Environment, MA: MIT
Press, 2001.
[4] T. Wanyama, and B.H. Far, "A protocol for multi-agent negotiation in a
group-choice decision-making," Journal of Network and Computer
Applications, vol. 30, pp.1173-1195, 2007.
[5] W.C. Stirling, Satisfying Games and Decision Making with Applications
to Engineering and Computer Science. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2003.
[6] L. D. Miles, Techniques of Value Analysis and Engineering, 3rded. NY:
Eleanor Miles Walker, 1989.
[7] K. Yang, Voice of Customer, Capture and Analysis. NY: McGraw Hill
Proffesional, 2007.
[8] Kitamura, Y. and Mizoguchi, R, "An ontology of functional concept of
artefacts". AI-TR, no.1, 1999.
[9] J.J. Kaufman, Value Management: Creating Competitive Advantage.
Kent: Financial World Publishing, 2001.
[10] R. Woodhead, "Concepts of value in value management: the relationship
between function and value". Value World summer, SAVE International,
2007.
[11] C.W. Bytheway, FAST Creativity and Innovation: Rapidly Improving
Processes, Product Development and Solving Complex Problems.
Florida: J.Ross Publishing, 2007.
[12] J.J. Kaufman and R. Woodhead, Stimulating Innovation in Products and
Services with Function Analysis Mapping, New Jersey: John
Wiley&Sons. 2006.
[13] S.J. Kirk and A. Dell-Isola, Life Cycle Costing for Design Professionals,
2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
[14] P. Barringer, "A life cycle cost summary". The International conference
of Maintenance Societies. Maintenance Engineering Society of
Australia, Perth, 20-23 May, 2003.
[15] J.W. Bull, Life Cycle Cost for Construction, London: Blackie Academic
& Professional, 1993.
[16] H. Liu, V. Gopalkrishnan, K.T.N Quynh, W-K. Ng "Regression models
for estimating product life cycle cost". Journal of Intelligent
Manufacturing. Springer Science+Business Media. DOI
10.1007/s10845-008-0114-4, 2008.
[17] C. Utomo, A. Idrus, M. Napiah and M.F. Khamidi, "Agreement options
and coalition formation on value-based decision". Symposium on
Computational Intelligence in Multi criteria Decision-Making. IEEE
Society Nashville, TN, March 30 - April 2, 2009, pp.118-125.
[18] ASTM, ASTM Standards on Building Economics, 5th edition. ASTM
International, 2004.
[19] T.L. Saaty, "Decision making - the analytical hierarchy process and
network process (AHP/ANP)", Journal of System Science and System
Engineering, vol.13, no.1, pp.1-34, 2004.
@article{"International Journal of Business, Human and Social Sciences:64913", author = "Christiono Utomo and Arazi Idrus", title = "Value–based Group Decision on Support Bridge Selection", abstract = "Value-based group decision is very complicated since many parties involved. There are different concern caused by differing preferences, experiences, and background. Therefore, a support system is required to enable each stakeholder to evaluate and rank the solution alternatives before engaging into negotiation with the other stakeholders. The support system is based on combination between value-based analysis, multi criteria group decision making based on satisfying options, and negotiation process based on coalition formation. This paper presents the group decision and negotiation on the selection of suitable material for a support bridge structure involving three decision makers, who are an estate manager, a project manager, and an engineer. There are three alternative solutions for the material of the support bridge structure, which are (a1) steel structure, (a2) reinforced concrete structure and (a3) wooden structure.
", keywords = "Value-based, group decision, negotiation support,construction.", volume = "4", number = "7", pages = "1873-6", }
