Use of Chlorophyll Meters to Assess In-Season Wheat Nitrogen Fertilizer Requirements in the Southern San Joaquin Valley

Nitrogen fertilizer is the most used and often the most
mismanaged nutrient input. Nitrogen management has tremendous
implications on crop productivity, quality and environmental
stewardship. Sufficient nitrogen is needed to optimum yield and
quality. Soil and in-season plant tissue testing for nitrogen status are
a time consuming and expensive process. Real time sensing of plant
nitrogen status can be a useful tool in managing nitrogen inputs. The
objectives of this project were to assess the reliability of remotely
sensed non-destructive plant nitrogen measurements compared to wet
chemistry data from sampled plant tissue, develop in-season nitrogen
recommendations based on remotely sensed data for improved
nitrogen use efficiency and assess the potential for determining yield
and quality from remotely sensed data. Very good correlations were
observed between early-season remotely sensed crop nitrogen status
and plant nitrogen concentrations and subsequent in-season fertilizer
recommendations. The transmittance/absorbance type meters gave
the most accurate readings. Early in-season fertilizer recommendation
would be to apply 40 kg nitrogen per hectare plus 15 kg nitrogen per
hectare for each unit difference measured with the SPAD meter
between the crop and reference area or 25 kg plus 13 kg per hectare
for each unit difference measured with the CCM 200. Once the crop
was sufficiently fertilized meter readings became inconclusive and
were of no benefit for determining nitrogen status, silage yield and
quality and grain yield and protein.

• Brian H. Marsh

• Wheat
• nitrogen fertilization
• chlorophyll meter.

[1] Munier, D., T. Kearney, G. Pettygrove, K. Brittan, M. Mathews and L.
Jackson. 2006. Fertilization of small grains. University of California
ANR Publication 8167. [2] Pettygrove, S., R. Miller, R. Plant, R. Denison, L. Jackson, S.
Upadhyaya, T. Kearney and M. Cahn. 1998. Site-specific farming
information systems in a tomato-based rotation in the Sacramento
Valley. CDFA Report.
[3] Murdock, L. D. Call and J. James. 2004. Comparison and use of
chlorophyll meters on wheat. University of Kentucky. AGR-181.
[4] Wright, D., V. Rasmussen, R. Ramsey and D. Baker. 2004. Canopy
reflectance estimation of wheat nitrogen content for grain protein
management. GIS Science and Remote Sensing 41:287-300.
[5] Li, F., Y. Miao, F. Zhang, R. Li, X. Chen, H. Zhang, J Schroder, W.
Ruan, and L. Jia. 2009. In-season optical sensing improves nitrogen-use
efficiency for winter wheat. SSSAJ 73:1566-1574.
[6] Biemacher, J., B. Brorsen, F. Epplin, J. Solie, and W. Raun. 2009. The
economic potential of precision nitrogen application with wheat based
on plant sensing. Ag. Econ. 40:397-407.
[7] Plank, C. and S. Donohue. Small Grain – Barley, Oats, Rye, Wheat. In
Reference Sufficiency Ranges for Plant Analysis in the Southern Region
of the United States. ISBN:1-58161-394-6.
[8] Wang, G., K. Bronson, K. Thorp, J Mon, and M. Badaruddin. 2014.
Multiple leaf measurements improve effectiveness of chlorophyll meter
for durum wheat nitrogen management. Crop Sci. 54:817-826.