Urban Citizenship in a Sensor Rich Society

Urban public spaces are sutured with a range of
surveillance and sensor technologies that claim to enable new forms
of ‘data based citizen participation’, but also increase the tendency
for ‘function-creep’, whereby vast amounts of data are gathered,
stored and analysed in a broad application of urban surveillance. This
kind of monitoring and capacity for surveillance connects with
attempts by civic authorities to regulate, restrict, rebrand and reframe
urban public spaces. A direct consequence of the increasingly
security driven, policed, privatised and surveilled nature of public
space is the exclusion or ‘unfavourable inclusion’ of those considered
flawed and unwelcome in the ‘spectacular’ consumption spaces of
many major urban centres. In the name of urban regeneration,
programs of securitisation, ‘gentrification’ and ‘creative’ and ‘smart’
city initiatives refashion public space as sites of selective inclusion
and exclusion. In this context of monitoring and control procedures,
in particular, children and young people’s use of space in parks,
neighbourhoods, shopping malls and streets is often viewed as a
threat to the social order, requiring various forms of remedial action.
This paper suggests that cities, places and spaces and those who
seek to use them, can be resilient in working to maintain and extend
democratic freedoms and processes enshrined in Marshall’s concept
of citizenship, calling sensor and surveillance systems to account.
Such accountability could better inform the implementation of public
policy around the design, build and governance of public space and
also understandings of urban citizenship in the sensor saturated urban
environment.

• Mike Dee

• Citizenship
• Public Space
• Surveillance
• Young People.

[1] S. Watson, City Publics-The (dis)enchancements of urban encounters.
Oxon and New York: Routledge, 2006, pp.147.
[2] K. Malone, Street life: youth, culture and competing uses of public
space. Environment and Urbanization, 14 (2), 2002, 87-92.
[3] L. Hollis, Cities are Good For You. London: Bloomsbury, 2013, pp.412.
[4] C. Cunneen, Conflict, Politics and Crime-Aboriginal Communities and
the Police. NSW: Allen & Unwin, 2001, pp.182-189.
[5] C. Norris, and G. Armstrong, The Maximum Surveillance Society: The
rise of CCTV. Oxford: Berg, 1999, pp.142-171.
[6] I. Loader, Youth, Policing and Democracy. London: Macmillan, 1996.
[7] T.H. Marshall, and T. Bottomore, T.Citizenship and Social Class.
London: Pluto, 1950, pp.5-78.
[8] T.H. Marshall, A British sociological career. International Social
Science Journal, 25 (1/2), 1973, 88-100.
[9] J.H. Smith, “Foreword” In Bulmer, M., & Rees, A. (Eds.), Citizenship
Today The contemporary relevance of T.H. Marshall. London: UCL
Press, 1996, pp.9-11.
[10] M. Stibbe, “Ruhleben-The Story of British Civilian Internees in
Germany during the First World War, 1914-1918”. Paper presented at
the 2nd European Conference in First World War Studies, Oxford,
England, pp.10-12.
[11] A. Halsey, “T.H. Marshall and ethical socialism”. In M. Bulmer, &
Rees, A. (Eds.), Citizenship Today: The contemporary relevance of T.H.
Marshall. London: UCL Press.
[12] J.D. Ketchum, Ruhleben: a prison camp society. Toronto: University of
Toronto Press, 1965, pp.126-134.
[13] E. Low,Frameworks of Participation: Conceptions of Citizenship in
Twentieth Century Britain. Oxford: St. John's College, 2002.
[14] B. Turner,Citizenship and Capitalism: The Debate Over Reformism.
London: Allen & Unwin, 1986, pp.220-250.
[15] R. Dahrendorf, “Citizenship and Social Class”. In Bulmer, M., & Rees,
A. (Eds.), Citizenship Today The contemporary relevance of T.H.
Marshall. London: UCL Press, 1996, pp.37-49.
[16] G. Delanty,Citizenship in a global age. Buckingham: Open University
Press, 2000.
[17] K. Faulks,Citizenship. London: Routledge, 2000.
[18] J. Sorensen,The Exclusive European Citizenship. Aldershot: Avebury,
1996.
[19] P. Karvelas, “4000 young people join work for dole”. The Australian
15/10/14.
[20] P. Wilson,“Everyone is watching you”. The Australian,10/11/06, pp. 12.
[21] D. Mitchell, The Right To The City. London: The Guildford Press, 2003.
[22] J. Bessant, “The silent consensus linking citizenship and young people”.
Children Australia, 21(4), 1996, pp.29-38.
[23] S. Walby, “Is Citizenship Gendered?”The Journal of the British
Sociological Association, 28(2), 1994, pp.379-396.
[24] M. Bulmer, and A. Rees, A. (Eds.). Citizenship Today- The
contemporary relevance of T. H. Marshall. London: UCL Press, 1996.
[25] A. Davidson,From Subject to Citizen: Australian Citizenship in the
Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997,
pp.47-52.
[26] Electoral Commission, The, Voter engagement and young people.
Canberra: Australian Electoral Commission, 2002.
[27] W. Runciman, “Why social inequalities are generated by social rights”.
In Bulmer, M., & Rees, A. (Eds.), Citizenship Today The contemporary
relevance of T.H. Marshall. London: UCL Press, 1996, pp.49-51.
[28] A. Howard,“We are the Masters Now”. In M. Sissons, & French, P.
(Eds.) Age Of Austerity 1945-1951.Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1964, pp.
17-23.
[29] J. Bessant,Keynote Address: “Youth Participation, Democratic Practice
& Problem Solving”, at the Youth Affairs Network Queensland Choices
and Challenges in Shaping Our Future Conference, Mackay,
Queensland, Australia,2003.
[30] B. Manning, and R. Ryan, Youth and Citizenship. Canberra: National
Youth Affairs Research Scheme, 2004.
[31] C. McNeely, (Ed.), Public Rights, Public Rules-Constituting Citizens in
the World Polity and National Policy. New York: Garland Publishing,
1998, pp.5-17.
[32] D. Heater,A Brief History of Citizenship. New York: New York
University Press, 2004, pp.115.
[33] H. Williamson, “Youth Work and Citizenship”. In J. C. Bynner, L, &
Furlong, A. (Eds.), Youth, Citizenship and Social Change in a European
Context. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997.
[34] A. Harris,Young People and Everyday Multiculturalism. London:
Routledge, 2013, pp.92-110.
[35] S. Sleight, Young People and the Shaping of Public Space in Melbourne,
1870-1914. Surrey: Ashgate, 2013.
[36] M. Roche, Rethinking Citizenship. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
[37] N. Petersen and W. Sanders, (Eds.), Citizenship And Indigenous
Australians Changing Conceptions and Possibilities. Melbourne:
Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[38] J. Noguera,“Citizens or Workers? Basic Income Versus Welfare-To-
Work Policies”. Paper presented at the 10th Congressof the Basic
Income European Network, Barcelona, Universal Forum of Cultures,
2004.
[39] A. Sen, Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny. New York: W.W.
Norton & Co, 2006.
[40] G. Standing,Globalisation: The Eight Crises of Social Protection.
Geneva: International Labour Office, 2001.
[41] G. Standing, Beyond the New Paternalism: Basic Security as Equality.
London: Verso, 2002.
[42] S.Weil,Oppression& Liberty. London: Routledge, 1998.
[43] Rowntree Foundation, the Joseph,The social value of public spaces.
Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York, 2011.
[44] J. Jacobs, J. (1965). The Life and Death of Great American Cities. New
York: Random House, 1965, pp.48-61
[45] Dee, M. (2008). “Young People, Public Space and Citizenship”.
Unpublished PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology.
[46] M. Leonard, “Teens and territory in contested spaces: Negotiating
sectarian interfaces in Northern Ireland”. Children’s Geographies.
Vol.4, 3-4, 2006, pp.439-456.
[47] D. Laughlin and L. Johnson, “Defining and exploring public space:
perspectives of young people from Regent Park, Toronto”. Children’s
Geographies. Vol.9, 2, pp.225-238.
[48] D. Sibley, Geographies of Exclusion: Society and Difference in the
West. London: Routledge, 1995.
[49] K. Lynch, Growing Up in Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.
[50] C. Freeman, “Colliding worlds: planning with children and young
people for better cities”. In Gleeson, B & Snipe, N. (Eds.), Creating
Child Friendly Cities. London: Routledge, 2006.
[51] J. Kulynych, “No playing in the public sphere: Democratic theory and
the exclusion of children”. Social Theory and Practice, 27(2), 2001,
pp.231-264.
[52] G. Valentine, Public Space and the Culture of Childhood. Aldershot and
New York: Ashgate, 2004.
[53] H. Woolley, “Freedom of the city: contemporary issues and policy
influences on children and young people’s use of public open space in
England”. Children’s Geographies, 4(1), 2006, pp.45-59.
[54] D. Summers, “A modern child’s home appears to be its refuge”.
TheFinancial Times, 25/04/1995, pp.9.
[55] D. McNeish, and H. Roberts, Playing it Safe: Today’s Children at Play.
Ilford: Barnardos, 1995, pp.3-19.
[56] S. Weller, “Situating (young) teenagers in geographies of children and
youth”. Children’s Geographies, 4(1), 2006, pp.97-198.
[57] U.Beck,Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage, 1992,
pp.27-35.
[58] K. Malone and L. Hasluck, “Geographies of Exclusion”. Family Matters
No. 49 Autumn 2008. Australian Institute of Family Studies.
[59] P. Crane and M. Dee, M. “Young people, public space & New
Urbanism”. Youth Studies Australia, 20(1), 2001,pp11-18.
[60] R. White, “No-go in the fortress city: Young people, inequality and
space”.Urban Policy and Research, 14(1), 1996, pp.37-50.
[61] R. White,No Space of Their Own-Young People and Social Control in
Australia. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[62] D. Lyon, “Surveillance Studies: Understanding visibility, mobility and
the phenetic fix”. Surveillance and Society, 1(1), 2002, pp.1-7.
[63] D. Lyon, Surveillance Society. Buckingham: Open University Press,
2001.
[64] D. Lyon, The Electronic Eye-The Rise of Surveillance Society. Oxford:
Polity Press, 1994.
[65] R. Shields,Lifestyle Shopping: The Subject of Consumption. London:
Routledge, 1992.
[66] S. Miles, and M. Miles,Consuming Cities. Basingstoke and New York:
Palgrave, 2004.
[67] B. Glaser,The Grounded Theory Perspective 2: Description’s
Remodeling of Grounded Theory Methodology. Mill Valley CA:
Sociology Press, 2003.
[68] R. White and J. Wyn,Youth and Society, exploring the social dynamics
of youth experience. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2004.
[69] V. Morrow, “Children's rights to public space: environment and
curfews”. In B. Franklin (Ed.), The New Handbook of Children's Rights.
London: Routledge, 2002, pp.9-17.
[70] D. Nelkin and L.Andrews, “Surveillance creep in the genetic age”. In
Lyon, D. (ed.) Surveillance as Social Sorting. London: Routledge, 2003.
[71] K. Walby, “Little England? The rise of open-street Closed Circuit
Television surveillance in Canada”. Surveillance and Society, 4(1/2),
2006, pp.29-51.
[72] D. Garland, The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in
Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp.72-
89.
[73] G. Clavell, “The Political Economy of Surveillance in the (Wannabe)
Global City”. Surveillance and Society,8(4), 2011, pp.523-526.
[74] Z. Bauman and D. Lyon, Liquid Surveillance. Cambridge: Polity Press,
2013.
[75] J. Gabrys, “Programming environments: environmentality and citizen
sensing in the smart city”. Environment and Planning D: Society and
Space,Vol 32, 2014, pp.5-9.
[76] M. Davis,“Fortress Los Angeles: The Militarization of Urban Space”. In
P. Kasinitz (Ed.), Metropolis Centre and Symbol of our Times. London:
Macmillan, 1995.
[77] R. Fopp,“Increasing the Potential for Gaze, Surveillance and
Normalisation: the transformation of an Australian policy for people
who are homeless”. Surveillance and Society, 1(1), 2002, pp.48-65.
[78] H. Dean, “The translation of needs into rights: Reconceptualising social
citizenship as a global phenomenon”. International Journal of Social
Welfare. 22, 2013, S32-49.
[79] D. Leslie and J.P. Catungal, “Social Justice and the Creative City: Class,
Gender and Racial Inequalities”. Geography Compass 6/3 2012, pp.111-
122.