The Study and Practice of the Thermal Energy and Power Engineering Characteristic Specialty in China

According to the demand of the power and
refrigeration industry, the theoretical and practical teachings of the
Thermal Energy and Power Engineering characteristic specialty in
china are studied. The teaching reform and practice of the Thermal
Energy and Power Engineering specialty have been carried out,
including construction and reform measures, teaching reform and
practice, features, and achievements. Proved by practices, the
theoretical and practical teaching effects are obvious. The study results
can provides certain reference experience for theoretical and practical
teachings of the related specialties in china.


Authors:



References:
[1] Wang, A.M., Yang, Y.X., and Guo, L., “The study and practice of
specialty characteristics construction of computer science and
technology,” in First International Workshop on Education Technology
and Computer Science, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 1065-1069. [2] Hu, G.G. and Xu, H., “With the direction of the national energy
development need, constructing the top-ranking thermal energy & power
engineering characteristic specialty,” in 2010 International Conference
on Optics, Photonics and Energy Engineering, IEEE Computer Society,
pp. 446-448.
[3] Tan, M., Hu, X.Y., and Gu, J.J., “Characteristic specialty construction of
electronics and information engineering and computer education,” in 5th
International Conference on Computer Science and Education, IEEE
Computer Society, pp. 1626-1628.
[4] Hu, G.G., Yang, Z.P., Fu, Z.G., and Tong, L., “Constructing and
perfecting experimental teaching demonstration center of thermal energy
& power engineering specialty,” in 2010 2nd International Conference on
Education Technology and Computer, IEEE Computer Society, pp.
511-514.
[5] Zhang, C. and Liu, L., “The teaching reform and practice of thermal
energy and power engineering specialty,” in 2012 International
Conference on Cybernetics and Informatics, Springer, pp. 1563-1568.
[6] Du, Y.X., Tian, Q.H., Du, X., and He, K.D., “CAD/CAM courses
integration of theoretical teaching and practical training,”
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(21), 2014, pp. 4297-4300.
[7] Burdina, S., “Motivating students to study a theoretical course through
reflective writing,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93(21),
2013, pp. 2180-2185.
[8] Chen, D.S., Li, Z., and Wang, T.M., “Exploration and practice: A
competition based project practice teaching,” Mechatronics, 24(2), 2014,
pp. 128-138.
[9] Sarigöl, J. and Akdeniz, A.R., “The Effect of the Course of Teaching
Practice on Prospective Science Student Teachers’ Teaching Methods and
Technical Knowledge of the Subject of Electromagnetism,”
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136(9), 2014, pp. 463-468.
[10] L. Staman, A.J. Visscher, H. Luyten, The effects of professional
development on the attitudes, knowledge and skills for data-driven
decision making, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 2014, pp. 79-90.
[11] J.C. Wayman, J.B. Jimerson, Teacher needs for data-related professional
learning, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 2014, pp. 25-34.
[12] J.B. Jimerson, Thinking about data: Exploring the development of mental
models for data use among teachers and school leaders, Studies in
Educational Evaluation, 42, 2014, pp. 5-14.
[13] K. Schildkamp, L. Karbautzki, J. Vanhoof, Exploring data use practices
around Europe: Identifying enablers and barriers, Studies in Educational
Evaluation, 42, 2014, pp. 15-24.
[14] M. Lee, K. Seashore Louis, S. Anderson, Local education authorities and
student learning: the effects of policies and practices, School
Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23 (2), 2012, pp. 133-158.
[15] H.T.G. Van den Hurk, A.A.M. Houtveen, W.J.C.M. Van de Grift, D.W.P.
Cras, Data-feedback in teacher training. Using observational data to
improve student teachers’ reading instruction, Studies in Educational
Evaluation, 42, 2014, pp. 71-78.
[16] S. Katz, L.A. Dack, Towards a culture of inquiry for data use in schools:
Breaking down professional learning barriers through intentional
interruption, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 2014, pp. 35-40.
[17] L. Hubbard, A. Datnow, L. Pruyn, Multiple initiatives, multiple
challenges: The promise and pitfalls of implementing data, Studies in
Educational Evaluation, 42, 2014, pp. 54-62.
[18] A.C. Schulte, J.E. Eaton, J. Parker, Advances in treatment integrity
research: Multidisciplinary perspectives on the conceptualization,
measurement, and enhancement of treatment integrity, School
Psychology Review, 38, 2009, pp. 460-475.
[19] C. O’Donnell, Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of
implementation and its relationship to outcomes in k-12 curriculum
intervention research, Review of Educational Research, 78 (1), 2008, pp.
33-84.
[20] J.C. Wayman, Involving teachers in data-driven decision making: Using
computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection, Journal
of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10 (3), 2005, pp. 295-308.