The Identification of Selected Dysfunctions and Paradoxes in Corporate Social Responsibility Management in Small Enterprise

The study presents a brief and synthetic discussion of selected conclusions resulting from multidimensional and in-depth empirical studies. Its theoretical part presents the assumptions referring to social responsibility management from the perspective of the specific nature of small enterprise functioning, while the empirical part presents the selected dysfunctions and paradoxes in social responsibility management referring to this group of enterprises. The paper is summarized by a short list of the resulting recommendations.


Authors:



References:
[1] R.W. Ackerman, “How Companies Respond to Social Demands”,
Harvard University Review 1973, 51(4), pp.88-98.
[2] H. Alford, M. Naughton,” Beyond the Shareholders Model of the Firm:
Working toward The Common of a Business”, in: S.A. Cortright, M.
Naughton (eds.), “Rethinking the Purpose of Business. Interdisciplinary
Essays from the Social Catholic Tradition”, Notre Dame University
Press, Notre Dame 2002, pp. 27-47.
[3] A.B. Carroll, “Corporate Social Responsibility – Evolution of a
Definitional Construct”, Business & Society 1999, 38, pp. 268-295.
[4] J.M. Cramer, “Experiences with Structuring Corporate Social
Responsibility in Dutch Industry”, Journal of Cleaner Production 2005,
13(6), pp. 583-587.
[5] J.R Des Jaridins., J.J. McCall, “Contemporary Issues in Business
Ethics”, Reston Publishing Company, Belmont 1985, pp.44.
[6] T. Donaldson, L.E. Preston, “The Stakeholder Theory of the
Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications”, Academy of
Management Review 1995, 20(1), pp. 65-91.
[7] W.M. Evan, E.E. Freeman, “A Stakeholder Theory of Modern
Corporation: Kantian Capitalism”, in: T. Beauchamp, N. Bowie (eds.),
“Ethical Theory and Business”, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1988,
pp. 75-93.
[8] W.C. Frederick, “The Growing Concern Over Business Responsibility”,
California Management Review no. 2, Summer 1960, s.60.
[9] R.E .Freeman, “Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach”,
Pitman, Boston 1984.
[10] R.E. Freeman, “The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future
Directions”, Business Ethics Quarterly 1994, 4 (4),pp. 409-429.
[11] R.E. Freeman, R.A. Philips, Stakeholder Theory: Libertarian Defense,
Business Ethics Quarterly 2002, 12(3),pp. s. 331-349.
[12] E. Garriga, D. Mele, “Coroprate Social Responisbility Theories:
Mapping the Territory”, Journal of Business Ethics 2004, 53, p.52.
[13] “ISO 26000. Social Responsibility”, 2010, p.7
[14] T. M. Jones, “Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined”,
California Management Review, Spring 1980, pp. 59-67.
[15] R. Kaku, “The Path of Kyosei”, Harvard Business Review 1997, 75(2),
s. 55-62.
[16] R. Kaku, „Ścieżka kyosei”, in: M.E. Porter, M.R. Kramer, „Społeczna
odpowiedzialność przedsiębiorstw”, Harvard Business Review (polish
edition) wrzesień 2003, pp.117.
[17] H.H. Khoo, K.C. Tan, “Using the Australian Business Excellence
Framework to Achieve Sustainable Business Excellence”, Corporate
Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 2002, 9(4), p.
197.
[18] H. Kung, „Pokój na świecie – światowe religie – światowy etos”, in: J.
Sekuła (eds.), „Idea etyczności globalnej”, Wydawnictwo Seculum,
Siedlce 1999, p.386.
[19] I.O. Maignan, C. Ferrell, L. Ferrell, “A Stakeholder Model for
Implementing Social Responsibility in Marketing”, “European Journal
of Marketing” 2005, 39(9/10),pp. s. 956–977.
[20] F. Maon , V. Swaen, A. Lindgreen, “Designing and Implementing
Corporate Social Responsibility: An Integrative Framework Grounded I
Theory and Practice”, Journal of Business Ethics 2009, 87.
[21] D. Mele, “Not only Stakeholders Interests. The Firm oriented towards
the Common Good”, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame
2002.
[22] J. Lepoutre, A. Heene, “Investigating the Impact of Firm Size on Small
Business Social Responsibility: A Critical Review”, Journal of Business
Ethics, 67:3, 2006, p. 257.
[23] V.M., Panapanaan, L. Linnanen, M.M. Karvonen, V.T. Phan,
Roadmapping “Corporate Social Responsibility in Finnish Companies”,
Journal of Business Ethics 2003, 44(2), 1, pp.133–146.
[24] R.A. Philips, “Stakeholder Legitimacy”, Business Ethics Quarterly
2003, 13(1), pp. s. 479-502.
[25] S.P. Sethi, “Dimension of Corporate Social Responsibility: An
Analitical Framework”, California Management Review, Spring 1975,
pp. 58-64.
[26] A.Sokołowska, „Społeczna odpowiedzialność małego przedsiębiorstwa.
Identyfikacja – ocena - kierunki doskonalenia”, Wydawnictwo
Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, Wrocław 2013.
[27] L.J. Spence, J.F. Lozano, “Communicating about Ethics with Small
Firms: Experiences from the UK and Spain”, Journal of Business Ethics
2000, 27(1), p.43.
[28] J.A.F. Stoner, R.E. Freeman, D.R. Gilbert Jr., „Kierowanie”, PWE,
Warszawa 1997, p.114.
[29] D. Vogel, “The Study of Social Issues in Management: A Critical
Appraisal”, California Management Review 1986, 28(2), pp. 142-152.
[30] S. Wartick, P.L. Cochran, “The Evolution of Corporate Social
Performance Model”, Academy of Management Review 1985, 10(4), p. s.
767.
[31] S. Wartick, S. Mahon, “Towards a Substantive Definition of the
Corporate Issue Construct: A Review and Synthesis of Literature”,
Business and Society 1994, 33(3), pp. 293-311.
[32] M. Were, “Implementing Corporate Responsibility: The Chiquita Case”,
Journal of Business Ethics 2003, 44(2-3)., pp. 247-260.
[33] E. Wilson, “Social Responsibility of Business: What are the Small
Business Perspectives?”, Journal of Small Business Management
18(July), 1980, pp. 17-24.
[34] D.J. Wood, “Corporate Social Performance Revisited”, Academy of
Management Review 1991, 4, pp. 694-695.
[35] L. Zbiegień-Maciąg, „Etyka w zarządzaniu”, PWN, Warszawa 1991, pp.
48-49.