The Effect of the Disc Coulters Forms on Cutting of Spring Barley Residues in No-Tillage

The introduction of sowing technologies into minimum- or no-tillage soil has a number of economical and environmental virtues, such as improving soil properties, decreasing soil erosion and degradation, and saving working time and fuel. However, the main disadvantage of these technologies is that plant residues on the soil surface reduce the quality of the planted crop seeds, thus requiring plant residues to be removed or cut. This paper presents a analysis of disc coulter parameters and an experimental investigation of cutting spring barley straw containing various amounts of moisture with different disc coulters (smooth and notched).





References:
[1] Cakir E., Johnson C.E., Raper R.L., and Schafer R.L. 1994. The
mechanics of cutting plant residue on a rigid surface. ASAE-Paper 94-
1003, St. Joseph, p.38-43.
[2] Chen Y., Tessier S., and Irvine B. 2004. Drill and crop performances as
affected by different drill configurations for no-till seeding. Soil &
Tillage Research, 77(2), 147-155.
[3] Endrerud H.C. 1999. Dynamic performance of drill coulters in a soil
bin. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 74, 391-401
[4] Fallahi S., and Raoufat M.H. 2008. Row-crop planter attachments in a
conservation tillage system: A comparative study. Soil & Tillage
Research, 98, 27-34.
[5] Galedar M.N., Jafari A, Mohtasebi S.S., Tabatabaeefar A., Sharifi A.,
O`Dogherty M.J., Rafine S., and Richard G. 2008. Effects of moisture
content and level of the crop on the engineering properties of alfalfa
stems. Biosystems Engineering, 101, 199-208.
[6] Karayel D. 2009. Performance of a modified precision vacuum seeder
for no-till sowing of maize and soybean. Soil & Tillage Research, 104,
121-125.
[7] Linke C. 1998. Direktsaat - eine Bestandsaufnahme unter besonderer
Ber├╝cksichtigung technischer, agronomischer und ökonomischer
Aspekte. Dissertation, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, 482 pp.
[8] Linke C. 2006. Entwicklung der Direktsaat. Landtechnik, 61, 312-313
(in Germany).
[9] Liu J., Chen Y., and Kushwaha R.L. 2010. Effect of tillage speed and
straw length on soil and straw movement by a sweep. Soil & Tillage
Research, 109, 9-17.
[10] Magalhaes P.S.G., Bianchini A., and Braunbeck O.A. 2007. Simulated
and experimental analyses of toothed rolling coulter for cutting crop
residues. Biosystems Engineering, 96 (2), 193-200.
[11] Mion R.L., Benez S.H., Viliotti C.A., Moreira J.B., and Salvador N.
2009. Tridimentional efforts analyses of furrow opening in no-tillage
seeder. Ciencia Rural, 39 (5), 1414-1419.
[12] Morrison J.E., Hendrick J.G., and Schafer R.L. 1996. Soil forces on
coulter and disc-opener combinations. Transactions of the ASAE, 39
(2), 369-376.
[13] Ozbek O., Seflek A.Y., and Carman K. 2009. Some mechanical
properties of safflower stalk. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 25
(4), 619-625.
[14] Romaneckas K., Pilipavičius V., and Šarauskis E. 2010. Impact of
seedbed density on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) seed germination,
yield and quality of roots. Journal of Food, Agriculture &
Environment, 8 (2), 599-601.
[15] Rump B. 1997. Improvement of direct seeders by using residue
removers. Agricultural Engineering 1997. VDI Bericht, 1356, 69-72
[16] Rump B. 2002. Untersuchungen zur Bestimmung der Arbeitsqualität
von Scheibensäscharen für die Direktsaat. Dissertation, University of
Hohenheim, Stuttgart, 108 pp. (in Germany).
[17] Šarauskis E. 2008. The investigations of cutting straw with active disc
sowing ploughshares. Zemes ukio inzinerija, mokslo darbai
(Agricultural Engineering, research papers), 40(1), 17-29 (in
Lithuanian).
[18] Šarauskis E., and Romaneckas K. 2003. Research of technical means of
sugar beet seed insertion into stable. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 81(1),
184-196 (in Lithuanian).
[19] Šarauskis E., Godlinski F., Sakalauskas A., Schlegel M., Kanswohl N.,
Romaneckas K., Jasinskas A., and Pilipavi─ìius V. 2010. Effects of soil
tillage and sowing systems on sugar beet production under the climatic
conditions of Lithuania. Landbauforschung Volkenrode, 2 (60), 101-
110.
[20] ┼áarauskis E., Köller K., and Butkus V. 2005. Research on technological
parameters to determine the design factors of direct drilling coulters for
sugar beets. Landbauforschung Volkenrode, 3, 71-180.
[21] Šarauskis E., Vaiciukevicius E., Romaneckas K., Sakalauskas A., and
Baranauskaite R. 2009. Economic and energetic evaluation of
sustainable tillage and cereal sowing technologies in Lithuania. Rural
Development 2009, Proceedings, 4 (1), 280-285.
[22] Tebr├╝gge F., and Böhrnsen A. 2000. Direktsaat. Beurteilung durch
Landwirte und Experten in der EU und Nebraska. Landtechnik, 1, 17-
19.
[23] Tola E.H.M., M├╝ller J., and Köller K. 2001. Crop residue management
by a no-till single disc opener under different soil and residue
conditions. Farm Work Science Facing Challenges of the XXI Century,
29th Congress of CIOSTA-CIGR V, 165-171.
[24] Vamerali T., Bertocco M., and Sartori L. 2006. Effects of new widesweep
opener for no-till planter on seed zone properties and root
establishment in maize (Zea mays, L.): A comparison with double-disk
opener. Soil & Tillage Research, 89, 196-209.
[25] Van Oost K., Cerdan O., and Quine T.A. 2009. Accelerated sediment
fluxes by water and tillage erosion on European agricultural land. Earth
Surface Processes and Landforms, 34, 1625-1634.
[26] Kushwaha R.L., Vaishnav A.S., and Zoerb G.C. 1986. Soil bin
evaluation of disc coulter under no-till crop residue conditions.
Transactions of ASAE, 29, 40-44.