Self-Reliant and Auto-Directed Learning: Modes, Elements, Fields and Scopes

An exploration of the related literature reveals that all
instruction methods aim at training autonomous learners. After the
turn of second language pedagogy toward learner-oriented strategies,
learners’ needs were more focused. Yet; the historical, social and
political aspects of learning were still neglected. The present study
investigates the notion of autonomous learning and explains its
various facets from a pedagogical point of view. Furthermore;
different elements, fields and scopes of autonomous learning will be
explored. After exploring different aspects of autonomy, it is
postulated that liberatory autonomy is highlighted since it not only
covers social autonomy but also reveals learners’ capabilities and
human potentials. It is also recommended that learners consider
different elements of autonomy such as motivation, knowledge,
confidence, and skills.





References:
[1] R. Akbari, Recent Developments in Foreign Language Teaching: A
Brief Review. Roshd EFL, vol. 20, No. 76, pp. 25-32, 2005.
[2] S. Benesch, Critical Thinking: A Learning Process for Democracy.
TESOL Quarterly, vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 545-547, 1993a.
[3] S. Benesch, ESL, Ideology, and Politics of Pragmatism. TESOL
Quarterly, vol.20, No.34, pp. 705-716, 1933b.
[4] S. Benesch, Thinking Critically, Thinking Dialogically, TESOL
Quarterly, vol. 33, No.3, pp. 573-581, 1999.
[5] P. Benson, and P. Voller, Autonomy and Independence in Language
Learning, London and New York: Longman, 1997.
[6] P. Benson, the Philosophy and Politics of Learner Autonomy, In: P.
Benson, and P. Voller(Eds.), Autonomy and Independence in Language
Learning, London and New York: Longman, 1977.
[7] P. Benson, and P. Voller, Autonomy and Independence in Language
Learning, London and New York: Longman, 1997.
[8] M. P. Breen, and S. J. Mann, Shooting Arrows at the Sun: Perspectives
on Pedagogy of Autonomy, In: P. Benson, and P. Voller, (Eds.),
Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning, London and New
York: Longman, pp. 132-150, 1997.
[9] H. D. Brown, Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (4th
edition), New York: Longman, 2000.
[10] H. D. Brown, Teaching by Practices: An Interactive Approach to
Language Pedagogy (2nd ed.), New York: Longman, 2001.
[11] P. C. Candy, the Attainment of Subject-Matter Autonomy. In: D. Boud,
(Ed.), Developing Student Autonomy in Learning, London: Kogan, pp.
59-76, 1998.
[12] V. Cook, L2 Learning and Language Teaching (3rd edition), London:
Hodder Arnold, 2001.
[13] P. Foster, and A. Ohta, Negotiation for Meaning and Peer Assistance in
Second Language Classrooms, Applied Linguistics, vol. 26, No. 3, pp.
402-430, 2005.
[14] P. Freire, Pedagogy for the Oppressed, New York: Continuum, 1970.
[15] P. Freire, the Politics of Education, United States of America: Bergin
and Garvey, 1985.
[16] S. Hurd, T. Beaven, and A. Ortega, Developing Autonomy in a Distance
Language Learning Context: Issues and Dilemmas for Course Writers,
System, No, 29, pp. 341-355, 2001.
[17] B. Johnston, Putting Critical Pedagogy in Its Place: A Personal Account,
TESOL Quarterly, vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 557-565, 1999.
[18] M. K. Kabilan, Creative and Critical Thinking in Language Classrooms,
the Internet TESOL Journal, vol. 6, No. 6, p. 106, 2000.
[19] H. Katznelson, H. Perpignan, and B. Rubin, What Develops Along With
The Development Of Second Language Writing? Exploring the: By-
Products, Journal of Second Language Writing, No.10, pp.141-159,
2001.
[20] B. Kumaravadivelu, the Post Method Condition: Emerging Strategies for
Second/Foreign Language Teaching, TESOL Quarterly, vol. 28, No. 1,
pp. 27-49, 1994.
[21] B. Kumaravadivelu, Toward Post Method Pedagogy, TESOL Quarterly,
vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 537-561, 2000.
[22] B. Kumaravadivelu, Beyond Method: Macro Strategies for Language
Teaching, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.
[23] W. Littlewood, Self-Access: Why Do We Want It And What Can It Do?
In: P. Benson, and P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and Independence in
Language Learning, London and New York: Longman, 1997.
[24] S. McDonough, Applied Linguistics in Language Education, London:
Arnold, 2002.
[25] D. Nunan, Designing and Adapting Materials to Encourage Learner
Autonomy, In: P. Benson, and P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and
Independence in Language Learning, London and New York: Longman,
pp. 199-203, 1997.
[26] M. J. O’Malley, and A. U. Chamot, Learning Strategies in Second
Language Acquisition, Cambridge: CUP, 1990.
[27] R. L. Oxford, Language Learning Strategies, In C. Ronald, and D.
Nunan, The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other
Languages, Cambridge: CUP, 2001.
[28] A. H. Penaflorida, Nontraditional Forms of Assessment and Response to
Student Writing: A Step toward Learner Autonomy, In: J. C. Richards,
and R. A. Willy (Eds.), Methodology in Language Teaching: An
Anthology of Current Practice, Cambridge: CUP, 2002.
[29] A. Pennycook, The Concept of Method, Inserted Knowledge, and the
Politics of Language Teaching, TESOL Quarterly, vol. 23, No. 4, 1989.
[30] A. Pennycook, Cultural Alternatives and Autonomy, In: P. Benson, and
P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning,
London and New York: Longman, 2007.
[31] A. Pennycook, Introduction: Critical Approaches to TESOL, TESOL
Quarterly, vol. 33, No. 3, 1979.
[32] J. C. Richards, and T. S. Rogers, Approaches and Methods in Language
Teaching (2nd Ed.), Cambridge: CUP, 2001.
[33] J. C. Richards, and T. S. Rogers, Longman Dictionary of Language
Teaching and Applied Linguistics (3rd Ed.), London: Longman, 2002.
[34] S. Sheerin, an Exploration of the Relationship between Self-Access and
Independent Learning, In: P. Benson, and P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy
and Independence in Language Learning. London and New York:
Longman, 1997.
[35] G. Sturtridge, Teaching and Language Learning in Self-Access Centers:
Changing Roles? In: P. Benson, and P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and
Independence in Language Learning, London and New York: Longman,
1997. [36] P. Ur, a Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory, Cambridge:
CUP, 1996.