Rethinking the Languages for Specific Purposes Syllabus in the 21st Century: Topic-Centered or Skills-Centered

21st century has transformed the labor market
landscape in a way of posing new and different demands on
university graduates as well as university lecturers, which means that
the knowledge and academic skills students acquire in the course of
their studies should be applicable and transferable from the higher
education context to their future professional careers. Given the
context of the Languages for Specific Purposes (LSP) classroom, the
teachers’ objective is not only to teach the language itself, but also to
prepare students to use that language as a medium to develop generic
skills and competences. These include media and information
literacy, critical and creative thinking, problem-solving and analytical
skills, effective written and oral communication, as well as
collaborative work and social skills, all of which are necessary to
make university graduates more competitive in everyday professional
environments. On the other hand, due to limitations of time and large
numbers of students in classes, the frequently topic-centered syllabus
of LSP courses places considerable focus on acquiring the subject
matter and specialist vocabulary instead of sufficient development of
skills and competences required by students’ prospective employers.
This paper intends to explore some of those issues as viewed both by
LSP lecturers and by business professionals in their respective
surveys. The surveys were conducted among more than 50 LSP
lecturers at higher education institutions in Croatia, more than 40 HR
professionals and more than 60 university graduates with degrees in
economics and/or business working in management positions in
mainly large and medium-sized companies in Croatia. Various elements of LSP course content have been taken into
consideration in this research, including reading and listening
comprehension of specialist texts, acquisition of specialist vocabulary
and grammatical structures, as well as presentation and negotiation
skills. The ability to hold meetings, conduct business correspondence,
write reports, academic texts, case studies and take part in debates
were also taken into consideration, as well as informal business
communication, business etiquette and core courses delivered in a
foreign language. The results of the surveys conducted among LSP
lecturers will be analyzed with reference to what extent those
elements are included in their courses and how consistently and
thoroughly they are evaluated according to their course requirements.
Their opinions will be compared to the results of the surveys
conducted among professionals from a range of industries in Croatia
so as to examine how useful and important they perceive the same
elements of the LSP course content in their working environments.
Such comparative analysis will thus show to what extent the syllabi
of LSP courses meet the demands of the employment market when it
comes to the students’ language skills and competences, as well as
transferable skills. Finally, the findings will also be compared to the
observations based on practical teaching experience and the relevant
sources that have been used in this research. In conclusion, the ideas and observations in this paper are merely
open-ended questions that do not have conclusive answers, but might
prompt LSP lecturers to re-evaluate the content and objectives of
their course syllabi.

Authors:

• A. Knezović

Keywords:

• Languages for specific purposes (LSP)
• language skills
• topic-centered syllabus
• transferable skills.

References:

[1] E. Jendrych, “New approach to teaching English for business
communication,” Sino-US English Teaching, vol. 8, no. 10, 2011.
[2] E. Jendrych, “Developments in ESP teaching,” Studies in Logic,
Grammar and Rhetoric, 34 (1): 43-58, 2013.
[3] K. Gatehouse, “Key issues in English for Specific Purposes (ESP)
curriculum development,” The Internet TESL Journal, vol. VII, no. 10,
2001.
[4] R. Mackay and A. Mountford (Eds.), English for Specific Purposes: A
Case Study Approach. London: Longman, 1978. Cited in K. Gatehouse,
“Key issues in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) curriculum
development,” The Internet TESL Journal, vol. VII, no. 10, 2001.
[5] T. Hutchinson and A. Waters, English for Specific Purposes. A
Learning-Centred Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1987, pp. 5-22, 53-80.
[6] T. Dudley-Evans and M. J. St John, Developments in English for
Specific Purposes: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 1-17; 121-145.
[7] P. Strevens, ESP after Twenty Years: A Re-appraisal. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), ESP: State of the Art (pp. 1-13). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional
Centre, 1988. Cited in T. Dudley-Evans and M. J. St John,
Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-Disciplinary
Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 1-17;
121-145.
[8] D. Carver, “Some propositions about ESP,” The ESP Journal, vol.
2, issue 2, 1983, pp. 131-137. Cited in K. Gatehouse, “Key issues in
English for Specific Purposes (ESP) curriculum development,” The
Internet TESL Journal, vol. VII, no. 10, 2001.
[9] P. Robinson, ESP Today: a Practitioner’s Guide. Hemel Hempstead:
Prentice Hall International, 1991. Cited in T. Dudley-Evans and M. J. St
John, Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-
Disciplinary Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998,
pp. 1-17; 121-145.
[10] D. Nunan, Syllabus Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988, pp.
1-45.
[11] J. C. Richards, Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[12] M. Dueñas, “A description of prototype models for content-based
language instruction in higher education,” Bells: Barcelona English
Language and Literature Studies, vol. 12, 2003.
[13] W. Grabe and F. L. Stoller (1997) “Content-based instruction: research
foundations”. In M. A. Snow and D.M. Brinton (eds.) The Content-
Based Classroom. Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content.
White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman. 5-21. Cited in M. Dueñas,
“A description of prototype models for content-based language
instruction in higher education,” Bells: Barcelona English Language and
Literature Studies, vol. 12, 2003.
[14] L. Flowerdew, “Needs analysis and curriculum development in ESP” in
B. Paltridge and S. Starfield (eds.), The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013, pp. 325-347.
[15] M. Bracaj, “Teaching English for Specific Purposes and teacher
training,” European Scientific Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, 2014.
[16] 21ST Century Skills, a video as part of 21ST Century Learning, Pearson,
2013. Available at: http://www.pearsonelt.com/21stcenturylearning
[17] European Union Report, Transferability of Skills across Economic
Sectors: Role and Importance for Employment at European Level,
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2011.