Renewable Energy Industry Trends and Its Contributions to the Development of Energy Resilience in an Era of Accelerating Climate Change

Climate change and global warming vortex have grown to alarming proportions. Therefore, the need for a shift in the conceptualization of energy production is paramount. Energy practices have been created in the current situation. Fossil fuels continue their prominence, at the expense of renewable sources. Despite this abundance, a large percentage of the world population still has no access to electricity but there have been encouraging signs in global movement from nonrenewable to renewable energy but means to reverse climate change have been elusive. Worldwide, organizations have put tremendous effort into innovation. Conferences and exhibitions act as a platform that allows a broad exchange of information regarding trends in the renewable energy field. The Solar Power International (SPI) conference and exhibition is a gathering of concerned activists, and probably the largest convention of its kind. This study investigates current development in the renewable energy field, analyzing means by which industry is being applied to the issue. In reviewing the 2019 SPI conference, it was found innovations in recycling and assessing the environmental impacts of the solar products that need critical attention. There is a huge movement in the electrical storage but there exists a large gap in the development of security systems. This research will focus on solar energy, but impacts will be relevant to the entire renewable energy market.





References:
[1] NASA, Climate Change: How Do We Know? 2019 (2019).
[2] U. SBCI, Buildings and climate change: Summary for decision-makers, United Nations Environmental Program, Sustainable Buildings and Climate Initiative, Paris (2009) 1-62.
[3] United Nations, Affordable and clean energy: why it matters (2018).
[4] S.E. Sweden, Energy use in Sweden. 2019 (2019).
[5] UNFCCC, The Paris Agreement (2019).
[6] UNFCCC, Introduction to Climate Finance (2019).
[7] J. Rogelj, M. Den Elzen, N. Höhne, T. Fransen, H. Fekete, H. Winkler, R. Schaeffer, F. Sha, K. Riahi, M. Meinshausen, Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C, Nature. 534 (2016) 631-639.
[8] T. Güney, Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and sustainable development, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 26 (2019) 389-397.
[9] O. Hoegh-Guldberg, D. Jacob, M. Bindi, S. Brown, I. Camilloni, A. Diedhiou, R. Djalante, K. Ebi, F. Engelbrecht, J. Guiot, Impacts of 1.5 C global warming on natural and human systems, Global warming of 1.5° C.An IPCC Special Report (2018).
[10] IPCC, Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2015.
[11] IPCC, Global Warming of 1.5 ºC. 1 (2018).
[12] H. Exner-Pirot, J. Gulledge, Climate change & international security: The Arctic as a bellwether, Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (2012).
[13] T. Rogers, Conferences, and conventions 3rd edition: A global industry, Routledge, 2013.
[14] K. Loria, CO2 levels are at their highest in 800,000 years. 2019 (2018).
[15] A. Fenner, C. Kibert, M. Razkenari, H. Hakim, X. Lu, M. Kouhirostami, M. Sam, Embodied, operation, and commuting emissions: A case study comparing the carbon hotspots of an educational building, Cleaner Production (2021).
[16] A.E. Fenner, C.J. Kibert, J. Woo, S. Morque, M. Razkenari, H. Hakim, X. Lu, The carbon footprint of buildings: A review of methodologies and applications, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 94 (2018) 1142-1152.
[17] A.E. Fenner, Towards Hyper-Efficiency and Carbon Neutrality in Industrialized Residential Construction. [electronic resource] (2019).
[18] IPCC, Global Warming of 1.5 C (2018).
[19] Union of Concerned Scientists, Ten Signs of Global Warming (2017).
[20] M. Ghaderi, P. Asadi, M. Kouhirostamkolaei, Applying response surface methodology on the results of serial sequencing batch moving bed reactor, SN Applied Sciences. 2 (2020) 1-12.
[21] C.J. Kibert, Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery, John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
[22] C.J. Kibert, M.C. Monroe, A.L. Peterson, R.R. Plate, L.P. Thiele, Working toward sustainability: Ethical decision-making in a technological world, John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
[23] E. Cuce, S.B. Riffat, A comprehensive assessment of sectoral energy consumption in the UK: past, present and future, International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies. 11 (2016) 424-430.
[24] UNFCCC, Kyoto Protocol Reference Manual on Accounting of Emissions and Assigned Amount (2009).
[25] T.P. Lyon, H. Yin, Why do states adopt renewable portfolio standards?: An empirical investigation, The Energy Journal. 31 (2010).
[26] Department of Communications, Climate Action & Environment, Irelands National Renewable Energy Action Plan (NREAP) (2009).
[27] Swedish Cleantech, Renewable Energy (2019).
[28] H. Hakim, A.T. Asutosh, M.A. Razkenari, A.E. Fenner, C.J. Kibert, A Study of Net Zero Energy Buildings in the US: Evaluating Key Elements (2013) 472-481.
[29] IEA, Sweden is a leader in the energy transition, according to latest IEA country review. 2019 (2019).
[30] M. Kouhirostami, M. Kouhirostamkolaei, M. Sam, A. Asutosh, C. Kibert, Impact of Louvers Geometry of Windows on Cross-Ventilation in a Generic Isolated Building (Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) Simulation), ACSA 108-Annual Meeting (2020).
[31] M. Kouhirostami, Natural Ventilation Through Windows in a Classroom (CFD Analysis Cross-Ventilation of Asymmetric Openings: Impact of Wind Direction and Louvers Design), Texas Tech University Thesis and Dissertation (2018).
[32] M. Sam, M. Kouhirostami, A Critical Review on the Impact of Combining Outdoor Spaces and Nature with Learning Spaces on Students’ Learning Ability, GRID - Architecture Planning and Design Journal, 3 (2), 272-290. DOI: 10.37246/grid.664546 (2020).
[33] F. Appavou, A. Brown, B. Epp, A. Leidreiter, C. Lins, H.E. Murdock, E. Musolino, K. Petrichenko, T.C. Farrell, T.T. Krader, Renewables 2017 global status report, Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century.Paris: REN21 (2017).
[34] IRENA, Geothermal energy. 2019 (2019).
[35] IHA, 2020 Hydropower Status Report. 2019 (2019).
[36] SolarPower Europe, Global market outlook for solar power 2018-2022. 2019 (2018).
[37] ITP, concentrating solar thermal technology: Informing a CSP Roadmap for Australia, ITP Thermal (2018).
[38] R.H. Wiser, M. Bolinger, 2018 Wind Technologies Market Report (2019).
[39] U.S. EIA, Feed-in tariff: A policy tool encouraging deployment of renewable electricity technologies. 2019 (2013).
[40] State of California, California Renewable Feed-In Tariff (FIT) Program. 2019 (2018).
[41] GRU, Solar FIT. 2019 (2018).
[42] Tax policy center, what is a carbon tax? (2019).
[43] D.B. Marron, E. Toder, Carbon taxes and corporate tax reform, in: Implementing a US Carbon Tax, Routledge, 2015, pp. 183-200.
[44] A. Perea, C. Smith, M. Davis, A. Mond, B. Gallagher, S. Rumery, A. Holm, R. Goldstein, J. Baca, US Solar Market Insight Report 2018 Year In Review, Solar Energy Industries Association, Tech.Rep. (2019).
[45] K. Kosciuch, D. Riser-Espinoza, M. Gerringer, W. Erickson, A summary of bird mortality at photovoltaic utility scale solar facilities in the Southwestern US, Plos one. 15 (2020) e0232034.
[46] W. Erickson, “Lake Effect” What is the evidence? Summary of Bird Interactions with PV Solar. 2019 (2019).