Reclaiming Pedestrian Space from Car Dominated Neighborhoods

For a long time as a result of accommodating car traffic, planning ideologies in the past put a low priority on public space, pedestrianism and the role of city space as a meeting place for urban dwellers. In addition, according to authors such as Jan Gehl, market forces and changing architectural perceptions began to shift the focus of planning practice from the integration of public space in various pockets around the contemporary city to individual buildings. Eventually, these buildings have become increasingly more isolated and introverted and have turned their backs to the realm of the public space adjoining them. As a result of this practice, the traditional function of public space as a social forum for city dwellers has in many cases been reduced or even phased out. Author Jane Jacobs published her seminal book “The Death and Life of Great American Cities" more than fifty years ago, but her observations and predictions at the time still ring true today, where she pointed out how the dramatic increase in car traffic and its accommodation by the urban planning ideology that was brought about by the Modern movement has prompted a separation of the uses of the city. At the same time it emphasizes free standing buildings that threaten urban space and city life and result in underutilized and lifeless urban cores. In this discussion context, the aim of this paper is to showcase a reversal of just such a situation in the case of the Dasoupolis neighborhood in Strovolos, Cyprus, where enlightened urban design practice has see the reclamation of pedestrian space in a car dominated area.




References:
[1] J. Jacobs (1961). The death and life of great American cities, New York:
Random House.W.-K. Chen, Linear Networks and Systems (Book
style). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1993, pp. 123-135.
[2] J. Gehl (2010). Cities for People, Island Press, Washington, DC.
[3] S. Carr, M. Francis, L. G. Rivlin, A. M. Stone (1992). Public Space,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
[4] W. H. Whyte (1988). City: Rediscovering the Center, New York, NY:
Doubleday.
[5] S. M. Low (2000). On the Plaza: the Politics of Public Space and
Culture, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
[6] L. G. Rivlin (1987). The Neighborhood, Personal Identity and Group
Affiliation. In Altman, I., Wandersman, A. (Eds.). Neighborhood and
Community Environments, pp. 1-34. New York: Plenum.
[7] D. Appleyard (1981). Livable streets. Berkeley: University of California
Press.
[8] A. Loukaidou-Sideris & T. Banerjee (1998). Urban Design Downtown:
Poetics and Politics of Form. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[9] R. Sennett (1977). The fall of Public Man, Cambridge University Press,
Great Britain.
[10] M. Chidister (1988). Reconsidering the Piazza, Landscape Architecture,
78(1): 40-43.
[11] C. Cooper Marcus & C. Francis, Eds. (1998) People Places: Design
Guidelines for Urban Open Space, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
[12] R. Oldenburg (1989). The Great Good Place: Cafés, Coffee Shops,
Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts
and how they get through the Day. New York: Paragon House.
[13] K. Tester, Ed. (1994). The flâneur. New York: Routledge.
[14] Schuster, M. (2001). Ephemera, Temporary Urbanism and Imaging. In
L. J. Vale & S. B. Warner, Jr. (Eds.), Imaging the City: Continuing
Struggles and New Directions. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University
Center for Urban Policy Research Press.
[15] J. Holston (1995). Spaces of Insurgent Citizenship. Planning Theory,
Vol. 13, pp. 35-51.
[16] J. Gehl (2011). Life Between Buildings, Island Press, Washington, DC.
[17] D. Mitchell (2003). The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight
for Public Space, New York: Guilford Press.
[18] H. Lefebvre (1996/1968). The Right to the City, in Writings on Cities,
translated and edited by Eleonore Kaufman and Elizabeth Lebas,
Oxford, Blackwell.
[19] D. M. Smith (1994). Geography and Social Justice, Oxford, Blackwell.