Planning Method Study on the Ecological Restrained Construction Area from the Perspective of Governance: A Case from Yangzijin, Yangzhou, China

The restrained construction zoning, an important part
in the urban master plan, is a necessary planning tool to control the city
sprawl, to guarantee the reservation implementation of the various
types of protective elements, and to realize the storage of the essential
urban spatial resources. Simultaneously, owing to the diverse
constitutes of restrained construction area and the various stakeholders
involved in, its planning requires an overall consideration of all
elements from the perspective of coordination+, balance and
practicability to deal with the problems and conflicts in this process.
Taking Yangzijin Ecological Restrained Construction Area in
Yangzhou as an example, this study analyzes all the potential actors,
agencies and stakeholders in this restrained construction area, as well
as the relevant conflicts between each other. Besides, this study tries to
build up a planning procedure based on the framework of governance
theory, and proposes a possible planning method that combines
"rigidity" and "flexibility" to protect the ecological limitation
boundary, to take every interest into account, and to promote economic
development in a harmonious society.





References:
[1] LiBo, “A Review of Prohibited-construction and
Restrained-construction Areas: its Concept and Development”, Urban
Planning Forum, vol. 4, pp.75-80, 2008.
[2] GuChaolin, Ma Ting, Yuan Xiaohui, Dong GUangyu, Guo Jing 7 Wang
Xu,“Study on The Planning of Restricted Construction Area—Case Study
of the Central Green Land of the Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan Urban
Agglomeration”. Urban Planning Forum, vol. 4, 005, 2010.
[3] Liu Shuyan, Public Participation
Orientated Urban Governance: From the Perspective of Stakeholders,
Shanghai: Tongji University Press, 2010, pp. 151-162.
[4] Hongtao Sheng & Yun Wang, “From Passive
Response to Proactive Planning: Planning and Development of
Non-intensive Development Areas”, Urban Planning Forum, vol. 3, pp.
30-36, 2012.
[5] Zhendong Luo & Jingxiang
Zhang, “The Total Progress on the Planning Study for the Land out of
Urban Constructing in China”, Urban Planning Forum, vol. 1, pp. 39-43,
2007.
[6] Zhang Jingxiang, “City and Governance for
Region and the Research and Application in China”, Urban Issue, vol. 6,
pp. 40-44, 2000.
[7] Evans, Bob, Marko Joas, Susan Sundback, & Kate Theobald, Governing
sustainable cities, Taylor & Francis, 2013.
[8] Xu Yilun, “Study on Governance for Suburban Areas in China”, Planners,
vol. 9, pp. 19-21, 2002.
[9] Wu Keren, Analysis on the Four Stakeholders in City
Planning and Research on the Interests Balancing Mechanism. Hangzhou:
Zhejiang University, 2006.
[10] Stephen Goldsmith and William D. Eggers, Governing by Network: the
New Shape of the Public Sector, Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution
Press, 2004.
[11] Liu Kun, Li Gucai, Yin Xiaoling and Xu Li, “Towards Multi-dimensional Flexibility: The
Evolution of Planning”, Urban Planning Forum, vol. 1, pp. 63-70, 2012.
[12] Jon Pierre. Houndmills and Basingstoke, Partnerships in urban
governance: European and American experience, Hampshire: Macmillan
Press, 1998.