Optimization of a Four-Lobed Swirl Pipe for Clean-In-Place Procedures

This paper presents a numerical investigation of two horizontally mounted four-lobed swirl pipes in terms of swirl induction effectiveness into flows passing through them. The swirl flows induced by the two swirl pipes have the potential to improve the efficiency of Clean-In-Place procedures in a closed processing system by local intensification of hydrodynamic impact on the internal pipe surface. Pressure losses, swirl development within the two swirl pipe, swirl induction effectiveness, swirl decay and wall shear stress variation downstream of two swirl pipes are analyzed and compared. It was found that a shorter length of swirl inducing pipe used in joint with transition pipes is more effective in swirl induction than when a longer one is used, in that it has a less constraint to the induced swirl and results in slightly higher swirl intensity just downstream of it with the expense of a smaller pressure loss. The wall shear stress downstream of the shorter swirl pipe is also slightly larger than that downstream of the longer swirl pipe due to the slightly higher swirl intensity induced by the shorter swirl pipe. The advantage of the shorter swirl pipe in terms of swirl induction is more significant in flows with a larger Reynolds Number.

Authors:

• Guozhen Li
• Philip Hall
• Nick Miles
• Tao Wu

Keywords:

• Swirl pipe
• swirl effectiveness
• CFD
• wall shear stress
• swirl intensity.

References:

[1] Leliévre, C., et al., Cleaning in place: effect of local wall shear stress
variation on bacterial removal from stainless steel equipment. Chemical
Engineering Science, 2002. 57: p. 1287-1297.
[2] Jensen, B. B. B., et al., Local Wall Shear Stress Variations Predicted by
Computational Fluid Dynamics for Hygienic Design. Food and
Bioproducts Processing, 2005. 83(1): p. 53-60.
[3] Gillham, C. R., et al., Cleaning-in-Place of Whey Protein Fouling
Deposits. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 1999. 77(2): p. 127-136.
[4] Dev, S. R. S., et al., Optimization and modeling of an electrolyzed
oxidizing water based Clean-In-Place technique for farm milking
systems using a pilot-scale milking system. Journal of Food
Engineering, 2014. 135(0): p. 1-10.
[5] Pathogen Combat, E.I.P., Factors affecting fouling and cleanability of
closed food contact surface. 2011.
[6] Lelieveld, H. L. M., Mostert, M.A., Holah, J. and White, B., Hygiene in
Food Processing. Vol. 1st edn. 2003, Woodhead, Cambridge, UK.
[7] Changani, S. D., M. T. Belmar-Beiny, and P. J. Fryer, Engineering and
chemical factors associated with fouling and cleaning in milk
processing. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 1997. 14: p. 392-
406.
[8] Sharma, M. M., et al., Factors Controlling the Hydrodynamic
Detachment of Particles from Surfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface
Science, 1991. 149: p. 121-134.
[9] Hwang, Y. K. and N. S. Woo, Wall Shear Stress in the Helical Annular
Flow with Rotating Inner Cylinder. Diffusion and Defect Data Part B
Solid State Phenomena, 2007. 120: p. 261-266.
[10] Li, G., et al., Improving the efficiency of ‘Clean-In-Place’ procedures
using a four-lobed swirl pipe: A numerical investigation. Computers &
Fluids, 2015. 108(0): p. 116-128.
[11] Najafi, A. F., S. M. Mousavian, and K. Amini, Numerical investigations
on swirl intensity decay rate for turbulent swirling flow in a fixed pipe.
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2011. 53(10): p. 801-811.
[12] Ganeshalingam, J., Swirl Induction for Improved Solid-Liquid Flow in
Pipes. 2002, University of Nottingham.
[13] Ariyaratne, C., Design and Optimisation of Swirl Pipes and Transition
Geometries for Slurry Transport, in School of Chemical, Environmental
and Mining Engineering. 2005, University of Nottingham.
[14] Kitoh, O., Experimental study of turbulent swirling flow in a straight
pipe. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1991. 225: p. 445-479.
[15] Steenbergen, W. and J. Voskamp, The rate of decay of swirl in turbulent
pipe flow. Flow measurement and instrumentation, 1998. 9: p. 67-78.
[16] ANSYS, I., ANSYS Fluent 14.0 User's Guide. 2011: Southpointe,
Canonsburg, PA, USA.
[17] Bakker, A., Boundary Layers and separation, in Applied Computational
Fluid Dynamics. 2002.
[18] Fokeer, S., I.S. Lowndes, and D.M. Hargreaves, Numerical modelling of
swirl flow induced by a three-lobed helical pipe. Chemical Engineering
and Processing: Process Intensification, 2010. 49(5): p. 536-546.
[19] ANSYS, I., ANSYS Fluent 14.0 Theory Guide. 2011: Southpointe,
Canonsburg, PA, USA.
[20] Speziale, C.G., S. Sarkar, and T. B. Gatski, Modelling the Pressure-
Strain Correlation of Turbulence: An Invariant Dynamical Systems
Approach. J. Fluid Mech, 1991. 227: p. 245-272.
[21] Jensen, B.B.B., M. Stenby, and D.F. Nielsen, Improving the cleaning
effect by changing average velocity. Trends in Food Science &
Technology, 2007. 18: p. S58-S63.