Nuclear Power Generation and CO2 Abatement Scenarios in Taiwan

Taiwan was the first country in Asia to announce “Nuclear-Free Homeland" in 2002. In 2008, the new government released the Sustainable Energy Policy Guidelines to lower the nationwide CO2 emissions some time between 2016 and 2020 back to the level of year 2008, further abatement of CO2 emissions is planed in year 2025 when CO2 emissions will decrease to the level of year 2000. Besides, under consideration of the issues of energy, environment and economics (3E), the new government declared that the nuclear power is a carbon-less energy option. This study analyses the effects of nuclear power generation for CO2 abatement scenarios in Taiwan. The MARKAL-MACRO energy model was adopted to evaluate economic impacts and energy deployment due to life extension of existing nuclear power plants and build new nuclear power units in CO2 abatement scenarios. The results show that CO2 abatement effort is expensive. On the other hand, nuclear power is a cost-effective choice. The GDP loss rate in the case of building new nuclear power plants is around two thirds of the Nuclear-Free Homeland case. Nuclear power generation has the capacity to provide large-scale CO2 free electricity. Therefore, the results show that nuclear power is not only an option for Taiwan, but also a requisite for Taiwan-s CO2 reduction strategy.




References:
[1] A. Garg, K. Kazunari and T. Pulles, 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for
National Greenhouse gas Inventories, Chapter 1: Introduction. The
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
[2] Bureau of Energy, Energy Statistical Hand Book 2007. Bureau of
Energy, R.O.C., 2008.
[3] Bureau of Energy, White Paper on Energy in 2005. Bureau of Energy,
R.O.C., 2005.
[4] ITRI, Taiwan'S Future Energy Planning - Application and Maintenance
of the Energy Engineering Model (in Chinese). Bureau of Energy / ITRI,
R.O.C., 2005.
[5] P. C. Li, S. H. Hsu, C. H. Huang and H. H. Lin, Baseline Forecasting for
Greenhouse Gas Reduction in Taiwan: A Dynamic CGE Analysis, 2003.
http://csd.hss.nthu.edu.tw
[6] S. P. Hung, et al., Project of Long-Term Load Forecasting and Power
Development Planning of Taiwan (in Chinese). Bureau of Energy /
Taipower, 2008.
[7] R. Loulou, G. Goldstein and K. Noble, Documentation for the
MARKAL Family of Models. ANSWER MARKAL Manual, 2004.
[8] C. B. Huang, P. Y. Tseng, H. M. Chiu, B. Y. Zheng, F. K. Ko, and C. H.
Lin, INER MARKAL-MACRO Model EstablishmentÔöÇ BAU Scenario
Analysis and Validation of Electricity Scetor Submodel (INER-5241R).
INER, R.O.C., 2008.
[9] C. B. Huang, P. Y. Tseng, C. H. Lin, B. Y. Zheng, H. M. Chiu, F. K. Ko,
INER-s MARKAL-MACRO Data Base (INER-5228R). INER, R.O.C.,
2008.
[10] International Energy Agency (IEA), Energy Technology Prospectives
2008. IEA, 2008.
[11] Bureau of Energy, Energy Balance Sheet of Taiwan. Bureau of Energy,
R.O.C., 2001.
[12] Bureau of Energy, Energy Balance Sheet of Taiwan. Bureau of Energy,
R.O.C., 2006
[13] Bureau of Energy, Database of Taiwan-s MARKAL model for 2006
simulation (in Chinese). Bureau of Energy, R.O.C., 2006.
[14] Council for Economic planning and development, Population Evaluation
of Republic of China, Taiwan from 2006 to 2051 (in Chinese). R.O.C.,
2006.
[15] C. M. Lee, et al., The Baseline of CO2 Emissions and Estimation Method
of Taiwan (in Chinese). Center for Sustainable Development of National
Tsing Hua University, 2005.
[16] Defra, MARKAL Macro analysis of long run costs of climate change
mitigation targets. Defra, UK, 2007.