Multiple Approaches for Ultrasonic Cavitation Monitoring of Oxygen-Loaded Nanodroplets

Ultrasound (US) is widely used in medical field for
a variety diagnostic techniques but, in recent years, it has also
been creating great interest for therapeutic aims. Regarding drug
delivery, the use of US as an activation source provides better
spatial delivery confinement and limits the undesired side effects.
However, at present there is no complete characterization
at a fundamental level of the different signals produced by
sono-activated nanocarriers. Therefore, the aim of this study
is to obtain a metrological characterization of the cavitation
phenomena induced by US through three parallel investigation
approaches. US was focused into a channel of a customized
phantom in which a solution with oxygen-loaded nanodroplets
(OLNDs) was led to flow and the cavitation activity was
monitored. Both quantitative and qualitative real-time analysis
were performed giving information about the dynamics of
bubble formation, oscillation and final implosion with respect
to the working acoustic pressure and the type of nanodroplets,
compared with pure water. From this analysis a possible
interpretation of the observed results is proposed.

Authors:

• Simone Galati
• Adriano Troia

Keywords:

• Cavitation
• Drug Delivery
• Nanodroplets
• Ultrasound.

References:

[1] E.P. Stride and C.C. Coussions, Cavitation and contrast: the use of
bubbles in ultrasound imaging and therapy, Proceedings of the
Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in
Medicine, 2010, 224, 171-191.
[2] A. Zlitni and S.S. Gambhir, Molecular imaging agents for ultrasound,
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 2018, 45, 113-120.
[3] K.H. Martin and P.A. Dayton, Current status and prospects for
microbubbles in ultrasound theranostics, WIREs Nanomed
Nanobiotechnol 2013, 5, 329345.
[4] E.G. Schutt and D.H. Klein and R.M. Mattrey and J.G. Riess, Injectable
microbubbles as contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound imaging: the
key role of perfluorochemicals., Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2003, 42(28),
3218-35.
[5] A. Sanfeld and K. Sefiane and D. Benielli and A. Steinchen,
Does capillarity influence chemical reaction in drops and bubbles? A
thermodynamic approach, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science,
2000, 86(3), 153-193.
[6] A. Bisazza and P. Giustetto and A. Rolfo and I. Caniggia and S. Balbis
and C. Guiot and R. Cavalli, Microbubble-mediated oxygen delivery to
hypoxic tissues as a new therapeutic device., Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng
Med Biol Soc. 2008, 2008,2067-70.
[7] C. Magnetto and M. Prato and A. Khadjavi and I. Fenoglio
and J. Jose and G. R. Giulino and F. Cavallo and E. Quaglino
and E. Benintende and G. Varetto and A. Troia and R. Cavalli
and C. Guidot, Ultrasound-activated decafluoropentane-cored and
chitosan-shelled nanodroplets for oxygen delivery to hypoxic cutaneous
tissues, RSC Adv, 2014, 4, 38433-38441.
[8] O.D. Kripfgans and J.B. Fowlkes and D.L. Miller and O.P. Eldevik and
P.L. Carson, Acoustic droplet vaporization for therapeutic and diagnostic
applications, Ultrasound Med Biol, 2000, 26(7),1177-89.
[9] P. Poritsky, The collaps or growth of a spherical bubble or cavity in a
viscous fluid, Proceedings of the 1st US National Congress in Applied
Mathematics (ASME), 1952.
[10] J. Jiao and Y. He and K. Yasui and S.E. Kentish and M. Ashokkumar
and R. Manasseh and J. Lee, Influence of acoustic pressure and bubble
sizes on the coalescence of two contacting bubbles in an acoustic field,
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2015, 22, 70-77.
[11] S. Popinet and S. Zaleski, Bubble collapse near a solid boundary: a
numerical study of the influence of viscosity, Journal of Fluid Mechanics,
2002, 137-163.
[12] T. Boissenot and A. Bordat and E. Fattal and N.Tsapis,
Ultrasound-triggered drug delivery for cancer treatment using
drug delivery systems: From theoretical considerations to practical
applications, Journal of Controlled Release, 2016, 241, 144-163.
[13] A. Troia and R. Cuccaro and A. Schiavi, Independent tuning of acoustic
and mechanical properties of phantoms for biomedical applications of
ultrasound, Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express, 2017, 3.
[14] J. Frohly and S Labouret and C Bruneel and I Looten-Baquet and
R. Torguet, Ultrasonic Cavitation Monitoring by Acoustic Noise Power
Measurement., The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2000,
108, 2012-20.
[15] J. Wu and S. Zhou and X. Li, Acoustic emission monitoring
for ultrasonic cavitation based dispersion process, Journal of
Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2013, 135.