Moving from Rule-based to Principle-based in Public Sector: Preparers' Perspective

The move from cash accounting to accrual accounting, or rule-based to principle-based accounting, by many governments is part of an ongoing efforts in promoting a more business-like and performance-focused public sector. Using questionnaire responses from preparers of financial statements of public universities in Malaysia, this study examines the implementation challenges and benefits of principle-based accounting. Results from these responses suggest that most respondents perceived significant costs would be incurred in relation to staff training and recruitment of staffs with relevant technical knowledge. In addition, most respondents also perceived that there will be significant changes in the current accounting system and structure in order to comply with the principle-based accounting requirements. However, most respondents perceived that these changes might not result in significant benefits for management purposes, for example, financial management, budgeting and allocation of resources. Nevertheless, most respondents perceived that principle-based accounting information would facilitate the monitoring function of the board. The general perception is that adoption of principle-based accounting information is not significantly useful than rule-based accounting information is expected to change over time as preparers of the financial statements gradually understand and appreciate the benefits of principle-based accounting information. This infers that the perceived usefulness of different accounting system is a function of familiarity by the preparers.





References:
[1] Adrianni, Y., Kober, R and Ng, J. (2010). "Decision usefulness of cash
and accrual information: public sector managers- perspective".
Australian Accounting Review, 2, 144-153.
[2] Adam, B., Mussari, R and Jones, R., (2011), "The diversity of accrual
policies in local government financial reporting: and examination of
infrastructure, art and heritage assets in Germany, Italy and the UK",
Financial Accountability & Management, 27(2), 0267-4424.
[3] Arnaboldi, M. and Lapsley, I. (2009), On the implementation of accrual
accounting. European Accounting Review, Vol.18(4), pp. 809-836.
[4] Caccia, L., and Steccolini, L., (2006), "Accounting change in Italian
local governments: whats-s beyond managerial fashion?" Critical
Perspectives in Accounting, 17, 154-174.
[5] Carnegie, G.D., and West, B.P., (2005), "Making accounting
accountable in the public sector". Critical Perspectives on Accounting,
16, 905-928.
[6] Carlin, T.M. (2005). "Debating the impact of accrual accounting and
reporting in the public sector". Financial Accountability and
Management, 21(3), 0267-4424.
[7] Christensen, M., and Skaerbaek, P., (2007), Framing and overflowing of
public sector accountability innovation: a comparative study of reporting
practices, Accounting, Accountability and Auditing Journal, 20(1), 101-
132.
[8] Figlio, D.N., and Kenny, L.W., (2009), "Public sector performance
measurement and stakeholder support". Journal of Public Economics,
93, 1069-1077.
[9] Garseth-Nesbakk, L., (2011), "Accrual accounting representations in the
public sector - a case of autopoisis". Critical Perspectives on
Accounting, 22, 247-258.
[10] Goddard, A. (2008). Contemporary public sector accounting research - a
international comparison of journal papers. The British Accounting
Review 22, 36-45.
[11] Hauner, D., (2008), "Explaining differences in public sector efficiency:
evidence from Russia;s regions". World Development, 36(10), 1745-
1765.
[12] Hyndman, M,. and Connolly, C., (2011), "Accrual accounting in the
public sector: a road not always taken". Management Accounting
Research, 22, 36-45.
[13] Lapsley, G., Musari, R., and Paulsson, G. (2009). "On the adoption of
accrual accounting in the public sector: a self-evident and problematic
reform". European Accounting Review, 18(4), 719-723.
[14] Marti, C., (2006), "Accrual budgeting: accounting treatment of key
public sector items and implications for fiscal policy", Public Budgeting
and Finance, 45-65.
[15] Munisa, F., & Linhardt, D. (2011). "Trials of explicitness in the
implementation of public management reform". Critical Perspectives on
Accounting, 22, 550-566.
[16] Pinnuck, M., and Potter, B.N,. (2009). "The quality and conservatism of
the accounting earnings of local governments". Journal Accountability,
Public Policy. 28, 525-540.
[17] Paulsson, G. (2006), "Accrual accounting in the public sector:
experiences from the central government in Sweden", Financial
Accountability and Management, 22(1), 0627-4424.
[18] Rohe, G., Vasicek, D and Vasicek, V (2010). "Accounting regulations
and IPSAS implementation: Efforts of transition countries towards
IPSAS compliance". Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 6
(12), 1.
[19] Ramadhan, S., (2009), "Budgetary accounting and reporting practices in
Bahraini governmental units: an empirical study", International
Business Review, 18, 168-183.
[20] Rayegan, E., Parveizi, M., Nazari, K. and Emami, M. (2012).
"Government accounting: as assessment of theory, purposes and
standards". Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in
Business. 3(9), 521-531.
[21] Rossi, N. & Trequattrini, R. (2011). "IPSAS and accounting systems in
the Italian public adminstrations: expected changes and implementation
scenarios", Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing. 7(2), 134-147.
[22] Tickell, G. (2010). "Cash to accrual accounting: one nation-s dilemma".
International Business & Economics Research Journal, 9(11), 71-78.
[23] Timoshenko, K., and Adhikari, P., (2010), "A two-country comparison
of public sector accounting reforms: same ideas, different paths?"
Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management,
22(4), 449-486.
[24] Wyk, H.A. (2007). "Is the transformation of public sector financial
reports in South Africa-s provincial government on track". Meditari
Accounting Research, 15(2), 65-75.