Knowledge Representation and Retrieval in Design Project Memory

Knowledge sharing in general and the contextual access to knowledge in particular, still represent a key challenge in the knowledge management framework. Researchers on semantic web and human machine interface study techniques to enhance this access. For instance, in semantic web, the information retrieval is based on domain ontology. In human machine interface, keeping track of user's activity provides some elements of the context that can guide the access to information. We suggest an approach based on these two key guidelines, whilst avoiding some of their weaknesses. The approach permits a representation of both the context and the design rationale of a project for an efficient access to knowledge. In fact, the method consists of an information retrieval environment that, in the one hand, can infer knowledge, modeled as a semantic network, and on the other hand, is based on the context and the objectives of a specific activity (the design). The environment we defined can also be used to gather similar project elements in order to build classifications of tasks, problems, arguments, etc. produced in a company. These classifications can show the evolution of design strategies in the company.

Authors:

• Smain M. Bekhti
• Nada T. Matta

Keywords:

• Project Memory
• Knowledge re-use
• Design rationale
• Knowledge representation.

References:

[1] Berners-Lee, T. & Hendler, J. & Lassila, O. the Semantic Web, In:
Scien-tific American. 2001
[2] Jing, Y. & Taylor, N. & Brown, K., An intelligent Inference Approach to
user Interaction Modelling in a generic Agent Based Interface System, In
pro-ceedings of ECAI2002 (European Conference on Artificial
Intelligence), July, Lyon. 2002
[3] Bekhti, S., & Matta, N. Project memory: An approach of modelling and
reusing the context and the de design rationale, Proceedings of IJCAI'03
(Interna-tional joint of conferences of Artificial Intelligence) Workshop
on knowledge management and organisational memory, Accapulco.
2003
[4] Corby, O. & Faron-Zucker, C., Corese: A Corporate Semantic Web Engine,
Workshop on Real World RDF and Semantic Web Applications
11th Inter-national World Wide Web Conference, Hawaii. 2002
[5] Dieng-Kuntz-Kuntz, R. & Corby; O. & Gandon, F. & Giboin; A. &
Golebiowska, J. & Matta; N. & Ribière, M. Méthodes et outils pour la
gestion des con-naissances. 2eme edition. Dunod éditeur. 2001
[6] Van Heijst; G. & Schreiber, A. & Wielinga, B. Using Explicit
Ontologies in KBS Development. International Journal of Human
Computer Studies, Vol. 46. 1997
[7] Matta, N. Conflict Management in Concurrent Engineering: Modelling
Guides. Computational Conflicts: Conflict Modeling for Distributed
Intelligent Systems, with Contributions by Numerous Experts. Springer.
2000
[8] Karsenty, L. An empirical evaluation of design rationale documents. In:
Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing
Systems. Van-couver. 1996
[9] Buckingham, S. Representing Hard-to-Formalise, Contextualised,
Multid-isciplinary, Organisational Knowledge. Proceedings of AAI
Spring Symposium on Artificial Intelligence in Knowledge
Management, P.9-16. 1997
[10] Klein, M. Capturing Design Rationale in Concurrent Engineering
Teams, IEEE, Computer Support for Concurrent Engineering. 1993
[11] Matta, N. & Ribière, M. & Corby, O. & Lewkowicz, M. & Zacklad, M.
Project Memory in Design, Industrial Knowledge Management - A
Micro Level Approach. SPRINGER-VERLAG: RAJKUMAR ROY,
2000.
[12] Brown, D. C. & Berker, I.. Modeling Conflicts Between Agents in a
Design Context, Computational conflicts, Conflicts Modeling for
Distributed Intelligent System, 144-164, Springer. 2000
[13] Martin, M. Links between Electronic Documents and a Knowledge Base
of Conceptual Graphs. In proceedings of the International Conference on
Concep-tual Structures of ICCS. 1995
[14] Chein M. & Mugnier M.L. Specialization: Where do the difficulties
occur? In Proceeding of the seventh Annual Workshop on Conceptual
Structures, Las cruces, New Mexico. 1992
[15] Sowa, L. Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and
Ma-chine. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 1984
[16] RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema W3C
Recommenda-tion, February 10, 2004 Dan Brickley, R.V. Guha, eds.
2004
[17] Corby, O. & Dieng, R. & Faron-Zucker C. Querying the Semantic Web
with Corese Search Engine, Prestigious Applications of Intelligent
Systems PAIS, ECAI, Valencia. 2000