Investigating the Process Kinetics and Nitrogen Gas Production in Anammox Hybrid Reactor with Special Emphasis on the Role of Filter Media

Anammox is a novel and promising technology that has changed the traditional concept of biological nitrogen removal. The process facilitates direct oxidation of ammonical nitrogen under anaerobic conditions with nitrite as an electron acceptor without addition of external carbon sources. The present study investigated the feasibility of Anammox Hybrid Reactor (AHR) combining the dual advantages of suspended and attached growth media for biodegradation of ammonical nitrogen in wastewater. Experimental unit consisted of 4 nos. of 5L capacity AHR inoculated with mixed seed culture containing anoxic and activated sludge (1:1). The process was established by feeding the reactors with synthetic wastewater containing NH4-H and NO2-N in the ratio 1:1 at HRT (hydraulic retention time) of 1 day. The reactors were gradually acclimated to higher ammonium concentration till it attained pseudo steady state removal at a total nitrogen concentration of 1200 mg/l. During this period, the performance of the AHR was monitored at twelve different HRTs varying from 0.25-3.0 d with increasing NLR from 0.4 to 4.8 kg N/m3d. AHR demonstrated significantly higher nitrogen removal (95.1%) at optimal HRT of 1 day. Filter media in AHR contributed an additional 27.2% ammonium removal in addition to 72% reduction in the sludge washout rate. This may be attributed to the functional mechanism of filter media which acts as a mechanical sieve and reduces the sludge washout rate many folds. This enhances the biomass retention capacity of the reactor by 25%, which is the key parameter for successful operation of high rate bioreactors. The effluent nitrate concentration, which is one of the bottlenecks of anammox process was also minimised significantly (42.3-52.3 mg/L). Process kinetics was evaluated using first order and Grau-second order models. The first-order substrate removal rate constant was found as 13.0 d-1. Model validation revealed that Grau second order model was more precise and predicted effluent nitrogen concentration with least error (1.84±10%). A new mathematical model based on mass balance was developed to predict N2 gas in AHR. The mass balance model derived from total nitrogen dictated significantly higher correlation (R2=0.986) and predicted N2 gas with least error of precision (0.12±8.49%). SEM study of biomass indicated the presence of heterogeneous population of cocci and rod shaped bacteria of average diameter varying from 1.2-1.5 mm. Owing to enhanced NRE coupled with meagre production of effluent nitrate and its ability to retain high biomass, AHR proved to be the most competitive reactor configuration for dealing with nitrogen laden wastewater.

• Swati Tomar
• Sunil Kumar Gupta

• Anammox
• filter media
• kinetics
• nitrogen removal.

[1] D.I. Claudio, P. Michele, R. Roberto, L. Antonio, (2010) Nitrogen
recovery from a stabilized municipal landfill leachate. Bioresour
Technol 101: 1732-1736.
[2] R. Saran, G. Singh, S.K. Gupta, (2009) Adsorption of phenol from
aqueous Solution onto Fly Ash from a Thermal Power Plant. Adsorpt
Sci Technol 27 (3): 267-279.
[3] R. Keluskar, A. Nerurkar, A. Desai, (2013) Development of a
simultaneous partial nitrification, anaerobic ammonia oxidation and
denitrification (SNAD) bench scale process for removal of ammonia
from effluent of a fertilizer industry. Bioresour Technol 130: 390–397.
[4] S. Murat, G. Insel, N. Artan, D. Orhon, (2006) Performance evaluation
of SBR treatment for nitrogen removal from tannery wastewater. Water
Sci Technol 53 (12): 275-284.
[5] A. Magrí, F. Béline, P. Dabert, (2013) Feasibility and interest of the
anammox process as treatment alternative for anaerobic digester
supernatants in manure processing-An overview. J Environ Manage 131:
170-184.
[6] S.K. Gupta, R. Sharma, (1996) Biological oxidation of high strength
nitrogenous wastewater. Water Res 30(3): 593-600.
[7] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2006 Global
anthropogenic non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions: 1990 to 2020.
Washington, DC: US-EPA.
[8] W.R.L. Van der Star, W.R. Abma, D. Blommers, J.W. Mulder, T.
Tokutomi, M. Strous, C. Picioreanu, M.C.M. van Loosdrecht, (2007)
Startup of reactors for anoxic ammonium oxidation. Experiences from
the first full-scale anammox reactor in Rotterdam. Water Res 41: 4149–
4163.
[9] B. Wett, (2006) Solved upscaling problems for implementing
deammonification of rejection water. Water Sci Technol 53(12): 121–
128.
[10] M. Strous, J.J. Heijnen, J.G. Kuenen, M.S.M. Jetten, (1998) The
sequencing batch reactor as a powerful tool for the study of slowly
growing anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing microorganisms. Appl
Microbiol Biotechnol 50: 589–596.
[11] A. Bertino, (2010) Study on one-stage partial nitritation-Anammox
process in moving bed biofilm reactors: a sustainable nitrogen removal.
Trail-LWR Degree Project. ISSN 1651-064X.
[12] N. Chamchoi, S. Nitisoravut, (2007) Anammox enrichment from
different conventional sludges. Chemosphere 66: 2225-2232.
[13] C. Trigo, J.L. Campos, J.M. Garrido, R. M´endez, (2006) Start-up of the
Anammox process in a membrane bioreactor. Journal of Biotechnology
126 (4): 475–487.
[14] K.A. Third, J. Paxman, M. Schmid, M. Strous, M.S.M. Jetten, R. Cord-
Ruwisch, (2005) Enrichment of ANAMMOX from activated sludge and
its application in the CANON process. Microbial Ecology 459: 236–244.
[15] M. Oshiki, M. Shimokawa, N. Fujii, H. Satoh, S. Okabe, (2011)
Physiological characteristics of the anaerobic ammoniumoxidizing
bacterium Candidatus ‘Brocadia sinica’. Microbiology 157: 1706–1713.
[16] B. Kartal, N.M. de Almeida, W.J. Maalcke, H.J. Op den Camp, M.S.M.
Jetten, J.T. Keltjens, (2013) How to make a living from anaerobic
ammonium oxidation. FEMS Microbiology Rev 37: 428-461.
[17] A.A. Van de Graaf, P. De Bruijn, L.A. Robertson, M.S.M. Jetten, J.G.
Kuenen, (1996) Autotrophic growth of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing
micro-organisms in a fluidized bed reactor. Microbiology 142 (8): 2187–
2196.
[18] A.O. Sliekers, K.A. Third, W. Abma, J.G. Kuenen, M.S.M. Jetten,
(2003) CANON and Anammox in a gas-lift reactor. FEMS Microbiol
Lett 218:339–344.
[19] X. Duan, J. Zhou, S. Qiao, X. Yin, T. Tian, F. Xu, (2012) Start-up of the
anammox process from the conventional activated sludge in a hybrid
bioreactor. J Environ Sci 24: 1083-1090.
[20] S.C. Grandhi, L.M.S. Pandey, S.K. Gupta, G. Singh, (2011)
Comparative evaluation of high rate anaerobic processes for treatment of
distillery spent wash. J Indus Res Technol 1(1): 17-23.
[21] S.K. Gupta, S.K. Gupta, (2007) Bio-degradation of distillery spent wash
in anaerobic hybrid reactor. Water Res 41: 721-730.
[22] F.C. Escobar, J. Pereda-Marin, P. Alvarez-Mateos, F. Romero-Guzman,
M.M.D. Barrantes, (2005) Aerobic purification of dairy wastewater in
continuous regime part II: kinetic study of the organic matter removal in
two reactor configurations. Biochem Eng J 22: 117–124.
[23] E.L. Stover, D.F. Kincannon, (1982) Rotating biological contactor
scaleup and design, in: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference
on Fixed Film Biological Processes, Kings Island, Ohio .
[24] P. Grau, M. Dohanyas, J. Chudoba, (1975) Kinetics of multicomponent
substrate removal by activated sludge. Water Res 9:337–342.
[25] J. Monod, (1949) The growth of bacterial cultures. Ann Rev Microbiol
3: 371–376.
[26] G. Abbas, L. Wang, W. Li, M. Zhang, P. Zheng, (2015) Kinetics of
nitrogen removal in pilot-scale internal-loop airlift-bioparticle reactor for
simultaneous partial nitrification and anaerobic ammonium oxidation.
Ecol Eng 74: 356-363. [27] S.Q. Ni, S. Sung, Q.Y. Yue, B.Y. Gao, (2012) Substrate removal
evaluation of granular anammox process in a pilot-scale upflow
anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Ecol Eng 38: 30-36.
[28] S.Q. Ni, P.H. Lee, S. Sung, (2010) The kinetics of nitrogen removal and
biogas production in an anammox non-woven membrane reactor.
Bioresour Technol 101: 5767–5773.
[29] X.W. Huang, Q.Y. Wei, K. Urata, Y. Tomoshige, X.H. Zhang, Y.
Kawagoshi, (2014) Kinetic study on nitrogen removal performance in
marine anammox bacterial culture. J Biosci Bioeng 117(3): 285-291.
[30] R.C. Jin, P. Zheng, (2009) Kinetics of nitrogen removal in high rate
anammox upflow filter. J Hazard Mater 170: 652–656.
[31] W.R.L. Van der Star, A.I. Miclea, U.G.J.M. Van Dongen, G. Muyzer, C.
Picioreanu, M.C.M. Van Loosdrecht, (2008) The membrane bioreactor:
a novel tool to grow anammox bacteria as free cells. Biotechnol Bioeng
101: 286–294.
[32] APHA, AWWA, WEF (2012) Standard Methods for Water and
Wastewater Examination, 22nd edn. American Public Health
Association, Washington.
[33] S. Suneethi, K. Joseph, (2011) ANAMMOX process start up and
stabilization with an anaerobic seed in Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor
(AnMBR). Bioresour Technol 102: 8860-8867.
[34] R.C. Jin, B.S. Xing, J.J. Yu, T.Y. Qin, S.X. Chen, (2013)The importance
of the substrate ratio in the operation of the Anammox process in upflow
biofilter. Ecol Engg 53:130–137.
[35] M. Strous, J.G. Kuenen, M.S.M. Jetten, (1999) Key physiology of
anaerobic ammonium oxidation. Appl Environ Micorbiol 65:3248–3250.
[36] C.J. Tang, P. Zheng, C.H. Wang, Q. Mahmood, J.Q. Zhang, X.G. Chen
et al. (2011) Performance of high-loaded ANAMMOX UASB reactors
containing granular sludge. Water Res 45(1):135–144.
[37] J.V. Padin, I. Fernádez, M. Figueroa, A. Mosquera-Corral, J.L. Campos,
R. Méndez, (2009) Applications of Anammox based processes to treat
anaerobic digester supernatant at room temperature. Bioresour Technol
100:2988–2994.
[38] S. Bagchi, R. Biswas, T. Nandy, (2010) Startup and stabilization of an
Anammox process from a non-acclimatized sludge in CSTR. J Ind
Microbiol Biotechnol 37:943–952.