Influence of S. carnosus Bacteria as Biocollector for the Recovery Organic Matter in the Flotation Process

The mineral bioflotation represents a viable
alternative for the evaluation of new processes benefit alternative.
The adsorption bacteria on minerals surfaces will depend mainly on
the type of the microorganism as well as of the studied mineral
surface. In the current study, adhesion of S. carnosus on coal was
studied. Several methods were used as: DRX, Fourier Transform
Infra-Red (FTIR) adhesion isotherms and kinetic. The main goal is to
recovery of organic matter by the microflotation process on coal
particles with biological reagent (S. carnosus). Adhesion tests
revealed that adhesion took place after of 8 h at pH 9. The results
suggest that the adhesion of bacteria to solid substrates can be
considered an abiotic physicochemical process that is consequently
governed by bacterial surface properties such as their specific surface
area, hydrophobicity and surface functionalities. The greatest coal
fine flotability was of 75%, after 5 min of flotation.





References:
[1] Elmahdy AM, El-Mofty SE, Abdel-Khalek NA, El-Midany AA. Impact
of corynebacterium-diphtheriae-intermedius bacteria adsorption on
enhancing the phosphate and dolomite separation selectivity. Adsorpt
Sci Technol 2011; 29: 47–57.
[2] Elmahdy AM, El-Mofty SE, Abdel-Khalek NA, El-Midany AA. Do
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa bacteria affect the selectivity of
dolomite/apatite separation? Tenside Surfact Deterg 2011; 48: 439–44.
[3] Elmahdy AM, El-Midany AA, Abdel-Khalek NA, El-Mofty SE. Effect
of oleate/bacteria interactions on dolomite separation from phosphate
Ore. Tenside Surfact Deterg 2009;46:340–5.
[4] Jia, CY, Wei, DZ, Li, PJ, Li, XJ, Tai, PD, Liu, W, Gong, ZQ. Selective
adsorption of Mycobacterium phleion pyrite and sphalerite. Colloids and
Surfaces B: Biointerfaces; 2011 83, 214–219
[5] Dwyer, R, Bruckard, WJ, Rea, S, Holmes, RJ,. Review, bioflotation and
bioflocculation review: microorganisms relevant for mineral
beneficiation, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy
(Transaction Institute Mineral Metallurgy C), 2012; 121, 2, 65–71.
[6] Botero, AEC, Torem, ML, Mesquita, LMS. Fundamental studies of
hodococcus opacus as a biocollector of calcite and magnesite. Minerals
Engineering. 2008; 20 (10), 1026–1032.
[7] Sharma PK, Rao H K. Analysis of different approaches for evaluation of
surface energy of microbial cells by contact angle goniometry; Advances
in Colloid and Interface Science, 2002, 98; 341-463.
[8] Díaz-López, CV, Pecina-Treviño, ET., Orrantia-Borunda, E. A study of
bioflotation of chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite mixtures in presence of L.
ferrooxidans. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly 2012; 51 (2), 118–125
[9] Rao, KH, Subramanian, S. Bioflotation and bioflocculation of relevance
to minerals bioprocessing. In: Microbial processing of metal sulfides
(Edgardo R. Donati e Wolfgang Sand), 2007;. 267–286.
[10] El-Midany AA, Abdel-Khalek MA. Reducing sulfur and ash from coal
using Bacillus subtilis and Paenibacillus polymyxa. Fuel 2014;115
(2014) 589–595.
[11] Yoon RH, Bubble–particle interactions in flotation, in: B.K. Parekh, J.D.
Miller (Eds.), Advances in Flotation Technology, Society for Mining,
Metallurgy and Exploration, 1999, 95–112.
[12] Poortinga AT, Bos R, Norde W, Busscher HJ.Surface Science Reports
2002;47:1–9.
[13] Stratton H, Brooks P, Griffiths P, Seviour R. Cell surface
hydrophobicity and mycolic acid composition of Rhodococcus strains
isolated from activated sludge foam. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2002;
28:264–7.
[14] Patra P, Natarajan KA. Microbially induced flocculation and flotation
for separation of chalcopyrite from quartz and calcite. Int J Miner
Process 2004;74:143–55.
[15] Hanumantha KR, Vilinska A, Chernyshova IV. Minerals bioprocessing:
R & D needs in mineral biobeneficiation. Hydrometallurgy, 2010; 104:
465-470.