Impact of Reproductive Technologies on Women’s Lives in New Delhi: A Study from Feminist Perspective
This paper is concerned with the ways in which
Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) affect women’s lives
and perceptions regarding their infertility, contraception and
reproductive health. The paper is based on a qualitative feminist
survey study to explore and analyze issues arising from the use of
ARTs by women in New Delhi, the capital of India. A rapid growth in
the number of fertility clinics has been noticed recently. A critical
analysis of interviews revealed that these technologies are used and
developed for making profits at the cost of women’s lives. In this
way, these technologies are influencing and changing the traditional
patterns of motherhood requiring a rethinking about new ways of
reproduction introduced through the use of ARTs.
[1] Gene Corea, The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from
Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs, New York: Harper and Row,
1985.
[2] Rothman as cited in Spilker and lie, 2007, pp. 8–9.
[3] SAMA, ARTs and Women: Assitance in Reproduction or Subjugation?
New Delhi: Impulsive Creation, 2006.
[4] Anjali Widge, “Sociocultural attitudes towards infertility and assited
reproduction in India”, in Effy Vayena, Patrick J. Rowe and P. David
Griffin (eds.), Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted
Reproduction, WHO, Geneva, 2002,pp. 60-74.
[5] Janice Raymonds, Reproduction, Population, Technology and Rights,
Women in Action, Vol. 2. 1998.
[6] Susan Cooper, “Paradise Lost: Sexual Function and Infertility”,
Technology and Infertility, ed. by Machelle M. Seibel, Ann A. Kiessling,
Judith Bernstein, Susan R. Levin, New York: Spriger, 1993, pp.303-311
[7] Germaine Greer, “The Whole Woman” UK: Anchor, 2000, p. 4.
[8] Varada Jayan Madge, “Ethical Issues in Assisted Reproduction”, Social
Medicine, Vol. 6, No. 3, March 2012. pp.162-170.
[9] Gimenez, “The Mode of Reproduction in Transition: A Marxist-
Feminist Analysis of the Effects of Reproductive Technologies”, Gender
and Society, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1991, pp.334-350.
[10] S. Srinivasan, “Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Rights and
Choices” Making Babies: Birth Market and Assisted Reproductive
Technology in India, ed. By S. Srinivasan, New Delhi: Zubaan, 2010.
[11] J. Raymond, Women as Wombs: Reproductive Technology and the Battle
over Women’s Freedom, San Francisco: Harper, 1993.
[12] Sujoy Dhar: Inter Press Service, Kolkata, June 5, 2003,
http://www.aegis.com/news/ips/2003.IP030606.html.
[1] Gene Corea, The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from
Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs, New York: Harper and Row,
1985.
[2] Rothman as cited in Spilker and lie, 2007, pp. 8–9.
[3] SAMA, ARTs and Women: Assitance in Reproduction or Subjugation?
New Delhi: Impulsive Creation, 2006.
[4] Anjali Widge, “Sociocultural attitudes towards infertility and assited
reproduction in India”, in Effy Vayena, Patrick J. Rowe and P. David
Griffin (eds.), Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted
Reproduction, WHO, Geneva, 2002,pp. 60-74.
[5] Janice Raymonds, Reproduction, Population, Technology and Rights,
Women in Action, Vol. 2. 1998.
[6] Susan Cooper, “Paradise Lost: Sexual Function and Infertility”,
Technology and Infertility, ed. by Machelle M. Seibel, Ann A. Kiessling,
Judith Bernstein, Susan R. Levin, New York: Spriger, 1993, pp.303-311
[7] Germaine Greer, “The Whole Woman” UK: Anchor, 2000, p. 4.
[8] Varada Jayan Madge, “Ethical Issues in Assisted Reproduction”, Social
Medicine, Vol. 6, No. 3, March 2012. pp.162-170.
[9] Gimenez, “The Mode of Reproduction in Transition: A Marxist-
Feminist Analysis of the Effects of Reproductive Technologies”, Gender
and Society, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1991, pp.334-350.
[10] S. Srinivasan, “Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Rights and
Choices” Making Babies: Birth Market and Assisted Reproductive
Technology in India, ed. By S. Srinivasan, New Delhi: Zubaan, 2010.
[11] J. Raymond, Women as Wombs: Reproductive Technology and the Battle
over Women’s Freedom, San Francisco: Harper, 1993.
[12] Sujoy Dhar: Inter Press Service, Kolkata, June 5, 2003,
http://www.aegis.com/news/ips/2003.IP030606.html.
@article{"International Journal of Business, Human and Social Sciences:71447", author = "Zairunisha", title = "Impact of Reproductive Technologies on Women’s Lives in New Delhi: A Study from Feminist Perspective", abstract = "This paper is concerned with the ways in which
Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) affect women’s lives
and perceptions regarding their infertility, contraception and
reproductive health. The paper is based on a qualitative feminist
survey study to explore and analyze issues arising from the use of
ARTs by women in New Delhi, the capital of India. A rapid growth in
the number of fertility clinics has been noticed recently. A critical
analysis of interviews revealed that these technologies are used and
developed for making profits at the cost of women’s lives. In this
way, these technologies are influencing and changing the traditional
patterns of motherhood requiring a rethinking about new ways of
reproduction introduced through the use of ARTs.", keywords = "Assisted reproductive technologies, new ways
reproduction, voluntary and involuntary choice, women.", volume = "9", number = "11", pages = "3918-4", }