Evaluation Process for the Hardware Safety Integrity Level

Safety instrumented systems (SISs) are becoming increasingly complex and the proportion of programmable electronic parts is growing. The IEC 61508 global standard was established to ensure the functional safety of SISs, but it was expressed in highly macroscopic terms. This study introduces an evaluation process for hardware safety integrity levels through failure modes, effects, and diagnostic analysis (FMEDA).FMEDA is widely used to evaluate safety levels, and it provides the information on failure rates and failure mode distributions necessary to calculate a diagnostic coverage factor for a given component. In our evaluation process, the components of the SIS subsystem are first defined in terms of failure modes and effects. Then, the failure rate and failure mechanism distribution are assigned to each component. The safety mode and detectability of each failure mode are determined for each component. Finally, the hardware safety integrity level is evaluated based on the calculated results.




References:
[1] I. Yoshimura, and Y. Sato, "Safety achieved by the safe failure fraction
(SFF) in IEC 61508," IEEE Trans. Reliability, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 662-669,
Dec. 2008.
[2] H. Guo and X. Yang, "A simple reliability block diagram method for
safety integrity verification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety,
vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 1267-1273, Sep. 2007.
[3] M. A. Lundteigen, M. Rausand, and I. B. Utne,"Integrating RAMS
engineering and management with the safety life cycle of IEC 61508,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 94, no. 12, pp.
1894-1903, Dec. 2009.
[4] IEC 61508-4,"Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable
electronic safety-related systems - Part 4: Definitions and abbreviations,"
2nd ed., Apr. 2010.
[5] Y. Langeron, A. Barros, A. Grall andC. Bérenguer, "Combination of
safety integrity levels (SILs): A study of IEC61508 merging rules,"
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 21, no. 4, pp.
437-449, July 2008.
[6] H. Guo and X. Yang, "Automatic creation of Markov models for
reliability assessment of safety instrumented systems," Reliability
Engineering and System Safety, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 829-837, June 2008.
[7] M. Sallak, C. Simon, and J.-F. Aubry, "A fuzzy probabilistic approach for
determining safety integrity level," IEEE Trans.Fuzzy Systems, vol. 16,
no. 1, pp. 239-248, Feb. 2008.
[8] IEC 61508-2,"Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable
electronic safety-related systems-Part 2: Requirements for
electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-relatedsystems,"
2nd ed., Apr. 2010.
[9] M. A. Lundteigen and M. Rausand, "Architectural constraints in IEC
61508: do they have the intended effect?," Reliability Engineering and
System Safety, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 520-525, Feb. 2009.
[10] W.M. Goble and A.C. Brombacher, "Using a failure modes, effects and
diagnostic analysis (FMEDA) to measure diagnostic coverage in
programmable electronic systems," Reliability Engineering and System
Safety, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 145-148, Nov. 1999.
[11] M. Catelani, L. Ciani and V. Luongo, "The FMEDA approach to improve
the safety assessment according to the IEC61508," Microelectronics
Reliability, vol. 50, no. 9-11, pp. 1230-1235, Sep.-Nov. 2010.
[12] J. J. Sammarco, "Programmable electronic and hardwired emergency
shutdown systems: Aquantified safety analysis," IEEE Trans. Industry
Applications, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1061-1068, July-Aug. 2007.
[13] S. K. Kim and Y. S. Kim, "A study on FMEDA process for SIL
certification - A case study of a flame scanner -," IE Interfaces, vol. 25, no.
4, pp.422-430, Dec. 2012.
[14] J. Beugin, D. Renaux and L. Cauffriez, "A SIL quantification approach
based on an operating situation modelfor safety evaluation in complex
guided transportation systems," Reliability Engineering and System
Safety, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 1684-1700, Dec. 2007.
[15] T. S. Mathews, M. Ramakrishnan, U. Parthasarathy, A. J. Arul and C. S.
Kumar, "Functional reliability analysis of safety grade decay heat
removal system of indian 500 MWe (PFBR)," Nuclear Engineering and
Design, vol. 238, no. 9, pp. 2369-2376, Sep. 2008.
[16] A.C. Torres-Echeverría, S. Martorell and H. A. Thompson, "Modelling
and optimization of proof testing policies for safety instrumented
systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 94, no. 4, pp.
838-854, Apr. 2009.
[17] IEC 61508-1,"Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable
electronic safety-related systems-Part 1: General requirements," 2nd ed.,
Apr. 2010.
[18] H. Jin, M. A. Lundteigen and M. Rausand, "Reliability performance of
safety instrumented systems: A common approach for both low- and
high-demand mode of operation," Reliability Engineering and System
Safety, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 365-373, March 2011.
[19] IEC 61508-6,"Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable
electronic safety-related systems-Part 6: Guidelines on the application of
IEC 61508-2 and IEC 61508-3," 2nd ed., Apr. 2010.