European Ecological Network Natura 2000 - Opportunities and Threats
The research objective of the project and article
“European Ecological Network Natura 2000 – opportunities and
threats” Natura 2000 sites constitute a form of environmental
protection, several legal problems are likely to result. Most
controversially, certain sites will be subject to two regimes of
protection: as national parks and as Natura 2000 sites. This dualism
of the legal regulation makes it difficult to perform certain legal
obligations related to the regimes envisaged under each form of
environmental protection. Which regime and which obligations
resulting from the particular form of environmental protection have
priority and should prevail? What should be done if these obligations
are contradictory? Furthermore, an institutional problem consists in
that no public administration authority has the power to resolve legal
conflicts concerning the application of a particular regime on a given
site. There are also no criteria to decide priority and superiority of
one form of environmental protection over the other. Which
regulations are more important, those that pertain to national parks or
to Natura 2000 sites? In the light of the current regulations, it is
impossible to give a decisive answer to these questions. The internal
hierarchy of forms of environmental protection has not been
determined, and all such forms should be treated equally.
<p>[1] Consolidated version in Journal of Laws of 2009, No. 151, item 1220, as
amended.
[2] Pursuant to Article 6 sec. 1 of the Environmental Protection Act, "Forms
of environmental protection include the following:
1) national parks;
2) nature reserves;
3) landscape parks;
4) landscape protection sites;
5) Natura 2000 sites;
6) protected nature sites;
7) data collection sites;
8) sites used for ecological purposes;
9) nature and landscape complexes;
10) protection sites of plant, animal and fungal species.".
[3] The following literature related to Natura 2000 sites has been used in
this publication: A. Bołtromiuk (editor), Europejska Sieć Ekologiczna
Natura 2000 jako nowy element otoczenia polskiej wsi i rolnictwa
(Natura 2000 European Ecological Network as a New Element of
Surroundings in Polish Rural Areas and Agriculture), Warsaw 2010; A.
Bołtromiuk, M. Kłodziński (editor), Natura 2000 jako czynnik
zrównoważonego rozwoju obszarów wiejskich regionu Zielonych Płuc
Polski (Natura 2000 as Sustainable Development Factor of Rural Areas
in the Green Lungs of Poland region), Warsaw 2011; J. Ciechanowicz-
McLean, Międzynarodowe prawo ochrony środowiska (International
Environmental Protection Law), Warsaw 2001; J. Ciechanowicz-
McLean, Ochrona środowiska w działalności gospodarczej
(Environmental Protection in Business Activity), Warsaw 2003; J.
Ciechanowicz-McLean, Z. Bukowski, B. Rakoczy, Prawo ochrony
środowiska: komentarz (Environmental Protection Law: Commentary),
Warsaw 2008; EC COM 431 final: Communication from the
Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Financing
Natura 2000, 2004; J. Engel, Natura 2000 w ocenach oddziaływania
przedsięwzięć na środowisko (Natura 2000 in Environmental Impact
Assessments), Warsaw 2010; S. Gantioler, P. Brink, S. Bassi, M.
Kettunen, A. McConville, M. Rayment, Financing Natura 2000 –
Financing needs and socio-economic benefits resulting from investment
in the network, 2010; Natura 2000: szanse i zagrożenia (Natura 2000:
Chances and Threats), Instytut Problemów Współczesnej Cywilizacji
im. Marka Dietricha (Marek Dietrich Contemporary Civilization
Problems Institute), Warsaw 2010; K. Sundseth, P. Creed, Natura 2000:
ochrona różnorodności biologicznej Europy (Natura 2000: Protecting
Europe’s Biodiversity), Luxembourg 2009; S.C.F. de Piérola, Natura
2000 i społeczeństwo: instrumenty komunikacji społecznej w
zarządzaniu Siecią Natura 2000 (Natura 2000 and the Society:
Instruments of Social Communication in Management of Natura 2000
Network), Warsaw 2009; P. Rutkowski, Natura 2000 w leśnictwie
(Natura 2000 in Forestry), Warsaw 2009; B. Rakoczy, Ograniczenie
praw i wolności jednostki ze względu na ochronę środowiska w
Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (Limitation of the Individual
Rights and Freedoms due to Environmental Protection in the Polish
Constitution), Toruń 2009; B. Rakoczy, Komentarz do ustawy o
zapobieganiu szkodom w środowisku i ich naprawie (Commentary to the
Act on Preventing Damages to the Natural Environment and Redressing
Them), Warsaw 2008; B. Wierzbowski, B. Rakoczy, Podstawy prawa
ochrony środowiska (Basis of the Environmental Protection Law),
Warsaw 2007.
[4] OJ L 103, 1979, p. 1, as amended, referred to as "birds directive".
[5] OJ L 206, 1992, p. 7, as amended, referred to as "habitats directive".
[6] C-6/04 European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Northern Ireland.
[7] Journal of Laws of 2009 No. 33, item 262, as amended.
[8] § 3 item 2 b-c of the Regulation of the Minister of Environmental
Protection of 17 February 2010 in the matter of preparing the draft
protection action plan for Natura 2000 sites – Journal of Laws of 2010
No. 34, item 186.
[9] Journal of Laws of 2003 No. 80, item 717, as amended.
[10] Journal of Laws of 2003 No. 80, item 717, as amended.
[11] See Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No. 73/2009; Regulation of
the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of 11 March 2010 in
the matter of minimum standards (Journal of Laws No. 39, item 211);
announcement of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of
19 March 2009 in the matter of the list of requirements set forth in the
EU regulations, taking into account the national provisions
implementing those regulations (M.P. of 2009 No. 17, item 224);
announcement of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of
17 March 2010 on the change of the list of requirements set forth in the
EU regulations, taking into account the national provisions
implementing those regulations (M.P. of 2010 No. 16, item 169);
announcement of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of
28 December 2010 on the change of the list of requirements set forth in
the EU regulations, taking into account the national provisions
implementing those regulations (M.P. of 2011 No. 2, item 20);
announcement of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of
16 March 2011 on the change of the list of requirements set forth in the
EU regulations, taking into account the national provisions
implementing those regulations (M.P. of 2011 No. 27, item 299). At
present, this situation is unclear and at least two different legal
interpretations are permitted.
[12] Consolidated version in Journal of Laws of 2008, No. 170, item 1051, as
amended.
[13] OJ L 316, 2009, p. 65, as amended.
[14] OJ L 30, 2009, p. 16, as amended.
[15] Consolidated version in Journal of Laws of 2008, No. 25, item 129, as
amended.
[16] Polish Supreme Court Ruling of 25 February 2009, III CSK 546/08.
[17] Polish Supreme Court Ruling of 25 February 2009, III CSK 565/08.</p>
<p>[1] Consolidated version in Journal of Laws of 2009, No. 151, item 1220, as
amended.
[2] Pursuant to Article 6 sec. 1 of the Environmental Protection Act, "Forms
of environmental protection include the following:
1) national parks;
2) nature reserves;
3) landscape parks;
4) landscape protection sites;
5) Natura 2000 sites;
6) protected nature sites;
7) data collection sites;
8) sites used for ecological purposes;
9) nature and landscape complexes;
10) protection sites of plant, animal and fungal species.".
[3] The following literature related to Natura 2000 sites has been used in
this publication: A. Bołtromiuk (editor), Europejska Sieć Ekologiczna
Natura 2000 jako nowy element otoczenia polskiej wsi i rolnictwa
(Natura 2000 European Ecological Network as a New Element of
Surroundings in Polish Rural Areas and Agriculture), Warsaw 2010; A.
Bołtromiuk, M. Kłodziński (editor), Natura 2000 jako czynnik
zrównoważonego rozwoju obszarów wiejskich regionu Zielonych Płuc
Polski (Natura 2000 as Sustainable Development Factor of Rural Areas
in the Green Lungs of Poland region), Warsaw 2011; J. Ciechanowicz-
McLean, Międzynarodowe prawo ochrony środowiska (International
Environmental Protection Law), Warsaw 2001; J. Ciechanowicz-
McLean, Ochrona środowiska w działalności gospodarczej
(Environmental Protection in Business Activity), Warsaw 2003; J.
Ciechanowicz-McLean, Z. Bukowski, B. Rakoczy, Prawo ochrony
środowiska: komentarz (Environmental Protection Law: Commentary),
Warsaw 2008; EC COM 431 final: Communication from the
Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Financing
Natura 2000, 2004; J. Engel, Natura 2000 w ocenach oddziaływania
przedsięwzięć na środowisko (Natura 2000 in Environmental Impact
Assessments), Warsaw 2010; S. Gantioler, P. Brink, S. Bassi, M.
Kettunen, A. McConville, M. Rayment, Financing Natura 2000 –
Financing needs and socio-economic benefits resulting from investment
in the network, 2010; Natura 2000: szanse i zagrożenia (Natura 2000:
Chances and Threats), Instytut Problemów Współczesnej Cywilizacji
im. Marka Dietricha (Marek Dietrich Contemporary Civilization
Problems Institute), Warsaw 2010; K. Sundseth, P. Creed, Natura 2000:
ochrona różnorodności biologicznej Europy (Natura 2000: Protecting
Europe’s Biodiversity), Luxembourg 2009; S.C.F. de Piérola, Natura
2000 i społeczeństwo: instrumenty komunikacji społecznej w
zarządzaniu Siecią Natura 2000 (Natura 2000 and the Society:
Instruments of Social Communication in Management of Natura 2000
Network), Warsaw 2009; P. Rutkowski, Natura 2000 w leśnictwie
(Natura 2000 in Forestry), Warsaw 2009; B. Rakoczy, Ograniczenie
praw i wolności jednostki ze względu na ochronę środowiska w
Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (Limitation of the Individual
Rights and Freedoms due to Environmental Protection in the Polish
Constitution), Toruń 2009; B. Rakoczy, Komentarz do ustawy o
zapobieganiu szkodom w środowisku i ich naprawie (Commentary to the
Act on Preventing Damages to the Natural Environment and Redressing
Them), Warsaw 2008; B. Wierzbowski, B. Rakoczy, Podstawy prawa
ochrony środowiska (Basis of the Environmental Protection Law),
Warsaw 2007.
[4] OJ L 103, 1979, p. 1, as amended, referred to as "birds directive".
[5] OJ L 206, 1992, p. 7, as amended, referred to as "habitats directive".
[6] C-6/04 European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Northern Ireland.
[7] Journal of Laws of 2009 No. 33, item 262, as amended.
[8] § 3 item 2 b-c of the Regulation of the Minister of Environmental
Protection of 17 February 2010 in the matter of preparing the draft
protection action plan for Natura 2000 sites – Journal of Laws of 2010
No. 34, item 186.
[9] Journal of Laws of 2003 No. 80, item 717, as amended.
[10] Journal of Laws of 2003 No. 80, item 717, as amended.
[11] See Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No. 73/2009; Regulation of
the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of 11 March 2010 in
the matter of minimum standards (Journal of Laws No. 39, item 211);
announcement of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of
19 March 2009 in the matter of the list of requirements set forth in the
EU regulations, taking into account the national provisions
implementing those regulations (M.P. of 2009 No. 17, item 224);
announcement of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of
17 March 2010 on the change of the list of requirements set forth in the
EU regulations, taking into account the national provisions
implementing those regulations (M.P. of 2010 No. 16, item 169);
announcement of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of
28 December 2010 on the change of the list of requirements set forth in
the EU regulations, taking into account the national provisions
implementing those regulations (M.P. of 2011 No. 2, item 20);
announcement of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of
16 March 2011 on the change of the list of requirements set forth in the
EU regulations, taking into account the national provisions
implementing those regulations (M.P. of 2011 No. 27, item 299). At
present, this situation is unclear and at least two different legal
interpretations are permitted.
[12] Consolidated version in Journal of Laws of 2008, No. 170, item 1051, as
amended.
[13] OJ L 316, 2009, p. 65, as amended.
[14] OJ L 30, 2009, p. 16, as amended.
[15] Consolidated version in Journal of Laws of 2008, No. 25, item 129, as
amended.
[16] Polish Supreme Court Ruling of 25 February 2009, III CSK 546/08.
[17] Polish Supreme Court Ruling of 25 February 2009, III CSK 565/08.</p>
@article{"International Journal of Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences:54015", author = "Adam Niewiadomski", title = "European Ecological Network Natura 2000 - Opportunities and Threats", abstract = "The research objective of the project and article
“European Ecological Network Natura 2000 – opportunities and
threats” Natura 2000 sites constitute a form of environmental
protection, several legal problems are likely to result. Most
controversially, certain sites will be subject to two regimes of
protection: as national parks and as Natura 2000 sites. This dualism
of the legal regulation makes it difficult to perform certain legal
obligations related to the regimes envisaged under each form of
environmental protection. Which regime and which obligations
resulting from the particular form of environmental protection have
priority and should prevail? What should be done if these obligations
are contradictory? Furthermore, an institutional problem consists in
that no public administration authority has the power to resolve legal
conflicts concerning the application of a particular regime on a given
site. There are also no criteria to decide priority and superiority of
one form of environmental protection over the other. Which
regulations are more important, those that pertain to national parks or
to Natura 2000 sites? In the light of the current regulations, it is
impossible to give a decisive answer to these questions. The internal
hierarchy of forms of environmental protection has not been
determined, and all such forms should be treated equally.
", keywords = "Natura 2000, European Ecological Network.", volume = "7", number = "9", pages = "595-8", }
