Environmentally Adaptive Acoustic Echo Suppression for Barge-in Speech Recognition

In this study, we propose a novel technique for acoustic
echo suppression (AES) during speech recognition under barge-in
conditions. Conventional AES methods based on spectral subtraction
apply fixed weights to the estimated echo path transfer function
(EPTF) at the current signal segment and to the EPTF estimated until
the previous time interval. However, the effects of echo path changes
should be considered for eliminating the undesired echoes. We
describe a new approach that adaptively updates weight parameters in
response to abrupt changes in the acoustic environment due to
background noises or double-talk. Furthermore, we devised a voice
activity detector and an initial time-delay estimator for barge-in speech
recognition in communication networks. The initial time delay is
estimated using log-spectral distance measure, as well as
cross-correlation coefficients. The experimental results show that the
developed techniques can be successfully applied in barge-in speech
recognition systems.

• Jong Han Joo
• Jeong Hun Lee
• Young Sun Kim
• Jae Young Kang
• Seung Ho Choi

• Acoustic echo suppression
• barge-in
• speech recognition
• echo path transfer function
• initial delay estimator
• voice activity detector.

[1] S. Miyabe, Y. Hinamoto, H. Saruwatari, K. Shikano, and Y. Tatekura,
“Interface for barge-in free spoken dialogue system based on sound field
reproduction and microphone array,” EURASIP Journal on Advances in
Signal Processing, vol. 2007, Article ID 57470, 13 pages.
[2] M. M. Sondhi, “An adaptive echo canceler,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 46,
pp. 497-510, Mar. 1967.
[3] S. F. Boll, “Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral
subtraction,” IEEE trans. Acoust. Speech Sig. Processing, vol. 27, no. 2,
pp. 113–120, Nov. 1979.
[4] C. Avendano, “Acoustic echo suppression in the STFT domain,” in Proc.
IEEE Workshop on Application of Signal Processing to Audio and
Acoustics, Oct. 2001.
[5] C. Faller and J. Chen, “Suppressing acoustic echo in a spectral envelope
space,” IEEE Trans. on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 13, no. 5, pp.
1048-1062, Sep. 2006.
[6] J. Benesty. D. R. Morgan, and J. H. Cho, “A new class of doubletalk
detectors based on cross-correlation, ”IEEE Trans. on Speech and Audio
Processing, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 168-172, 2000.
[7] G. W. Elko, E. Diethorn, and T. G¨ansler, “Room impulse response
variation due to thermal fluctuation and its impact on acoustic echo
cancellation,” Proc. Intl. Workshop on Acoust. Echo and Noise Control
(IWAENC), Kyoto, Japan, pp. 67-70, Sep. 2003.
[8] C. Faller and C. Tournery, “Robust echo control using a simple echo path
model,” In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acous., Speech Signal Processing, vol. 5,
pp. 281-284, 2006.
[9] T. Aboulnasr and K. Mayyas, “A robust variable step-size LMS-type
algorithms: analysis and simulations,” IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing,
vol.45, no.3, pp.631-639, Mar. 1997.