Energy Production Potential from Co-Digestion between Frozen Seafood Wastewater and Decanter Cake in Thailand
In this paper, a Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP)
test provides a measure of the energy production potential from codigestion
between the frozen seafood wastewater and the decanter
cake. The experiments were conducted in laboratory-scale. The
suitable ratio of the frozen seafood wastewater and the decanter cake
was observed in the BMP test. The ratio of the co-digestion between
the frozen seafood wastewater and the decanter cake has impacts on
the biogas production and energy production potential. The best
performance for energy production potential using BMP test
observed from the 180 ml of the frozen seafood wastewater and 10 g
of the decanter cake ratio. This ratio provided the maximum methane
production at 0.351 l CH4/g TCODremoval. The removal efficiencies
are 76.18%, 83.55%, 43.16% and 56.76% at TCOD, SCOD, TS and
VS, respectively. The result can be concluded that the decanter cake
can improve the energy production potential of the frozen seafood
wastewater. The energy provides from co-digestion between frozen
seafood wastewater and decanter cake approximately 19x109
MJ/year in Thailand.
[1] R. E. Speece, “Anaerobic technology for industrial wastewaters”,
Archae Press, USA, 22, 1996.
[2] G.V. Nallathambi, “Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane
production: A review”, Biomass Bioenergy, 13, 83-114, 1997.
[3] K.V. Rajeshwari, M. Balakrishnan, A. Kansal, K. Lata, V.V.N. Kishore,
“State-of-the-art of anaerobic digestion technology for industrial
wastewater treatment”, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 4, 135-156, 2000.
[4] L.V.A. Truong, and N. Abatzoglou, “A H2S reactive adsorption process
for the purification of biogas prior to its use as a bioenergy vector”,
Biomass Bioenergy, 29: 142-151, 2005.
[5] P. Koblitsch, C. Pfeifer and H. Hofbauer, “Catalytic steam reforming of
model biogas”. Fuel, 87: 701-706, 2008.
[6] N.I. Krylova, R.E. Khabiboulline, R.P. Naumova and M.A. Nagel, “The
influence of ammonium and methods for removal during the anaerobic
treatment of poultry manure”. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 70(1): 99-
105, 1997.
[7] K. Karim, R. Hoffmann, K.T. Klassonb and M.H. Al-Dahhan,
“Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: Effect of mode of mixing”, Water
Research, 39: 3597-3606, 2005.
[8] F. J. Callaghan, D.A.J. Wase, K. Thayanithy and C.F. Forster, “Codigestion
of waste organic solids-batch studies”. Bioresource Technol.
67(2): 117-122, 1999.
[9] J. Gelegenis, D. Georgakakis, I. Angelidaki and V. Mavris,
“Optimization of biogas production by co-digesting whey with diluted
poultry manure”. Renewable Energy, 32(13): 2147-2160, 2007.
[10] A. Letomaki, S. Huttunen and J.A. Rintala, “Laboratory investigations
on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cattle manure for
methane production: Effect of crop to manure ratio”. Resources,
Conservation and Recycling, 51: 591-609, 2007.
[11] H. B. Nielsen and I. Angelidaki, “Strategies for optimizing recovery of
the biogas process following ammonia inhibition”. Bioresource
Technology, 99(17): 7995-8001, 2008.
[12] S. Pipatmanomai, S. Kaewluan and T. Vitidsant, “Economic assessment
of biogas-to-electricity generation system with H2S removal by activated
carbon in small pig farm”. Applied Energy, 86: 669-674, 2009.
[13] A. Mshandete, A. Kivaisi, M. Rubindamayugi, B. Mattiasson,
“Anaerobic batch co-digestion of sisal pulp and fish wastes”,
Bioresource Technology, 95(1), 19-24, 2004.
[14] W. Parawira, M. Murto, R. Zvauya, B. Mattiasson, “Anaerobic batch
digestion of solid potato waste alone and in combination with sugar beet
leaves”, Renewable Energy, 29, 1811-1823, 2004.
[15] O. Chavalparit, W.H. Rulkens, A.P.J. Mol, S. Khaodhair, “Options for
environmental sustainability of the crude palm oil industry in Thailand
through enhancement of industrial ecosystems”, Environment,
Development and Sustainability, 8(2), 271-287, 2006.
[16] W. F. Owen, D.C. Stuckey, J.B. Healy Jr., L.Y. Young and P.L.
McCarty, “Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and
anaerobic toxicity”. Water Res., 13: 485-492, 1979.
[17] K. Yetilmezsoy, S. Sakar, “Development of empirical models for
performance evaluation of UASB reactors treating poultry manure
wastewater under different operational conditions”, J. Hazardous
Materials, 153, 532-543, 2008.
[18] APHA, “Standard Method for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater”. 13th Edn., American Public Health Association,
Washington, pp: 874. 1971.
[19] P. L. McCarty, “Anaerobic waste treatment fundamental part I, II, III
and IV. Process Design”, Journal Public Works, 95, 1964.
[20] M.E. Souza, “Criteria for the utilization design and operation of UASB
reactors”, Water Research, 18: 55-69, 1986.
[21] R. T. Castillo, P.L. Luengo and J.M. Alvarez, “Temperature effect on
anaerobic of bedding manure in a one phase system at different
inoculums concentration”. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 54: 55-66, 1995.
[22] K.V. Rajeshwari, M. Balakrishnan, A. Kansal, K. Lata and V.V.N.
Kishore, “State-of-the-art of anaerobic digestion technology for
industrial wastewater treatment”. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, 4, 135-
156, 2000.
[23] I. Budiyono Widiasa N., Johari S. and Sunarso, “The influence of total
solid contents on biogas yield from cattle manure using rumen fluid
inoculum”. Energy Research Journal, 1(1), 7-12, 2010.
[24] I. Budiyono Widiasa N., Johari S. and Sunarso, “The kinetic of biogas
production rate from cattle manure in batch mode”. International
Journal of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 3(1), 39-44, 2010.
[25] N.A. Osman and T.S. Delia, “Effect of alkalinity on the performance of
a simulated landfill bioreactor digesting organic solid wastes”,
Chemosphere, 59: 871-879, 2005.
[26] E.J. Halbert, “Process operation and monitoring; poison and inhibitors”.
Proceeding of the 1st ASEAN Seminar Workshop on Biogas
Technology, ASEAN Committee on Science and Technology, Manila,
Philippines: 369-385, 1981.
[27] J.r., M.C. Sterling, R.E. Lacey, C.R. Engler and S.C. Ricke, “Effect of
ammonia nitrogen on H2 and CH4 during anaerobic digestion of dairy
cattle manure”. Bioresource Technology, 77: 9-18, 2001.
[28] O. Chavalparit, W.H. Rulkens, A.P.J. Mol and S. Khaodhair, “Options
for environmental sustainability of the crude palm oil industry in
Thailand through enhancement of industrial ecosystems”. Environ.
Devel. Sustainability, 8: 271-287, 2006.
[29] O. Chavalparit, W.H. Rulkens, A.P.J. Mol and S. Khaodhair, “Options
for environmental sustainability of the crude palm oil industry in
Thailand through enhancement of industrial ecosystems”. Environ.
Devel. Sustainability, 8: 271-287, 2006.
[30] Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency,
Ministry of Energy, Thailand, 2012. http://www.dede.go.th/dede/
index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=141&Itemid=122&la
ng=th. (Accessed January 15, 2012).
[1] R. E. Speece, “Anaerobic technology for industrial wastewaters”,
Archae Press, USA, 22, 1996.
[2] G.V. Nallathambi, “Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane
production: A review”, Biomass Bioenergy, 13, 83-114, 1997.
[3] K.V. Rajeshwari, M. Balakrishnan, A. Kansal, K. Lata, V.V.N. Kishore,
“State-of-the-art of anaerobic digestion technology for industrial
wastewater treatment”, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 4, 135-156, 2000.
[4] L.V.A. Truong, and N. Abatzoglou, “A H2S reactive adsorption process
for the purification of biogas prior to its use as a bioenergy vector”,
Biomass Bioenergy, 29: 142-151, 2005.
[5] P. Koblitsch, C. Pfeifer and H. Hofbauer, “Catalytic steam reforming of
model biogas”. Fuel, 87: 701-706, 2008.
[6] N.I. Krylova, R.E. Khabiboulline, R.P. Naumova and M.A. Nagel, “The
influence of ammonium and methods for removal during the anaerobic
treatment of poultry manure”. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 70(1): 99-
105, 1997.
[7] K. Karim, R. Hoffmann, K.T. Klassonb and M.H. Al-Dahhan,
“Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: Effect of mode of mixing”, Water
Research, 39: 3597-3606, 2005.
[8] F. J. Callaghan, D.A.J. Wase, K. Thayanithy and C.F. Forster, “Codigestion
of waste organic solids-batch studies”. Bioresource Technol.
67(2): 117-122, 1999.
[9] J. Gelegenis, D. Georgakakis, I. Angelidaki and V. Mavris,
“Optimization of biogas production by co-digesting whey with diluted
poultry manure”. Renewable Energy, 32(13): 2147-2160, 2007.
[10] A. Letomaki, S. Huttunen and J.A. Rintala, “Laboratory investigations
on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cattle manure for
methane production: Effect of crop to manure ratio”. Resources,
Conservation and Recycling, 51: 591-609, 2007.
[11] H. B. Nielsen and I. Angelidaki, “Strategies for optimizing recovery of
the biogas process following ammonia inhibition”. Bioresource
Technology, 99(17): 7995-8001, 2008.
[12] S. Pipatmanomai, S. Kaewluan and T. Vitidsant, “Economic assessment
of biogas-to-electricity generation system with H2S removal by activated
carbon in small pig farm”. Applied Energy, 86: 669-674, 2009.
[13] A. Mshandete, A. Kivaisi, M. Rubindamayugi, B. Mattiasson,
“Anaerobic batch co-digestion of sisal pulp and fish wastes”,
Bioresource Technology, 95(1), 19-24, 2004.
[14] W. Parawira, M. Murto, R. Zvauya, B. Mattiasson, “Anaerobic batch
digestion of solid potato waste alone and in combination with sugar beet
leaves”, Renewable Energy, 29, 1811-1823, 2004.
[15] O. Chavalparit, W.H. Rulkens, A.P.J. Mol, S. Khaodhair, “Options for
environmental sustainability of the crude palm oil industry in Thailand
through enhancement of industrial ecosystems”, Environment,
Development and Sustainability, 8(2), 271-287, 2006.
[16] W. F. Owen, D.C. Stuckey, J.B. Healy Jr., L.Y. Young and P.L.
McCarty, “Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and
anaerobic toxicity”. Water Res., 13: 485-492, 1979.
[17] K. Yetilmezsoy, S. Sakar, “Development of empirical models for
performance evaluation of UASB reactors treating poultry manure
wastewater under different operational conditions”, J. Hazardous
Materials, 153, 532-543, 2008.
[18] APHA, “Standard Method for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater”. 13th Edn., American Public Health Association,
Washington, pp: 874. 1971.
[19] P. L. McCarty, “Anaerobic waste treatment fundamental part I, II, III
and IV. Process Design”, Journal Public Works, 95, 1964.
[20] M.E. Souza, “Criteria for the utilization design and operation of UASB
reactors”, Water Research, 18: 55-69, 1986.
[21] R. T. Castillo, P.L. Luengo and J.M. Alvarez, “Temperature effect on
anaerobic of bedding manure in a one phase system at different
inoculums concentration”. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 54: 55-66, 1995.
[22] K.V. Rajeshwari, M. Balakrishnan, A. Kansal, K. Lata and V.V.N.
Kishore, “State-of-the-art of anaerobic digestion technology for
industrial wastewater treatment”. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, 4, 135-
156, 2000.
[23] I. Budiyono Widiasa N., Johari S. and Sunarso, “The influence of total
solid contents on biogas yield from cattle manure using rumen fluid
inoculum”. Energy Research Journal, 1(1), 7-12, 2010.
[24] I. Budiyono Widiasa N., Johari S. and Sunarso, “The kinetic of biogas
production rate from cattle manure in batch mode”. International
Journal of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 3(1), 39-44, 2010.
[25] N.A. Osman and T.S. Delia, “Effect of alkalinity on the performance of
a simulated landfill bioreactor digesting organic solid wastes”,
Chemosphere, 59: 871-879, 2005.
[26] E.J. Halbert, “Process operation and monitoring; poison and inhibitors”.
Proceeding of the 1st ASEAN Seminar Workshop on Biogas
Technology, ASEAN Committee on Science and Technology, Manila,
Philippines: 369-385, 1981.
[27] J.r., M.C. Sterling, R.E. Lacey, C.R. Engler and S.C. Ricke, “Effect of
ammonia nitrogen on H2 and CH4 during anaerobic digestion of dairy
cattle manure”. Bioresource Technology, 77: 9-18, 2001.
[28] O. Chavalparit, W.H. Rulkens, A.P.J. Mol and S. Khaodhair, “Options
for environmental sustainability of the crude palm oil industry in
Thailand through enhancement of industrial ecosystems”. Environ.
Devel. Sustainability, 8: 271-287, 2006.
[29] O. Chavalparit, W.H. Rulkens, A.P.J. Mol and S. Khaodhair, “Options
for environmental sustainability of the crude palm oil industry in
Thailand through enhancement of industrial ecosystems”. Environ.
Devel. Sustainability, 8: 271-287, 2006.
[30] Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency,
Ministry of Energy, Thailand, 2012. http://www.dede.go.th/dede/
index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=141&Itemid=122&la
ng=th. (Accessed January 15, 2012).
@article{"International Journal of Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences:55990", author = "Thaniya Kaosol and Narumol Sohgrathok", title = "Energy Production Potential from Co-Digestion between Frozen Seafood Wastewater and Decanter Cake in Thailand", abstract = "In this paper, a Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP)
test provides a measure of the energy production potential from codigestion
between the frozen seafood wastewater and the decanter
cake. The experiments were conducted in laboratory-scale. The
suitable ratio of the frozen seafood wastewater and the decanter cake
was observed in the BMP test. The ratio of the co-digestion between
the frozen seafood wastewater and the decanter cake has impacts on
the biogas production and energy production potential. The best
performance for energy production potential using BMP test
observed from the 180 ml of the frozen seafood wastewater and 10 g
of the decanter cake ratio. This ratio provided the maximum methane
production at 0.351 l CH4/g TCODremoval. The removal efficiencies
are 76.18%, 83.55%, 43.16% and 56.76% at TCOD, SCOD, TS and
VS, respectively. The result can be concluded that the decanter cake
can improve the energy production potential of the frozen seafood
wastewater. The energy provides from co-digestion between frozen
seafood wastewater and decanter cake approximately 19x109
MJ/year in Thailand.
", keywords = "Frozen seafood wastewater, decanter cake, biogas,
methane, BMP test.", volume = "7", number = "7", pages = "468-5", }
