Development of an Automatic Calibration Framework for Hydrologic Modelling Using Approximate Bayesian Computation

Hydrologic models are increasingly used as tools to
predict stormwater quantity and quality from urban catchments.
However, due to a range of practical issues, most models produce
gross errors in simulating complex hydraulic and hydrologic systems.
Difficulty in finding a robust approach for model calibration is one of
the main issues. Though automatic calibration techniques are
available, they are rarely used in common commercial hydraulic and
hydrologic modelling software e.g. MIKE URBAN. This is partly
due to the need for a large number of parameters and large datasets in
the calibration process. To overcome this practical issue, a
framework for automatic calibration of a hydrologic model was
developed in R platform and presented in this paper. The model was
developed based on the time-area conceptualization. Four calibration
parameters, including initial loss, reduction factor, time of
concentration and time-lag were considered as the primary set of
parameters. Using these parameters, automatic calibration was
performed using Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC). ABC is
a simulation-based technique for performing Bayesian inference
when the likelihood is intractable or computationally expensive to
compute. To test the performance and usefulness, the technique was
used to simulate three small catchments in Gold Coast. For
comparison, simulation outcomes from the same three catchments
using commercial modelling software, MIKE URBAN were used.
The graphical comparison shows strong agreement of MIKE URBAN
result within the upper and lower 95% credible intervals of posterior
predictions as obtained via ABC. Statistical validation for posterior
predictions of runoff result using coefficient of determination (CD),
root mean square error (RMSE) and maximum error (ME) was found
reasonable for three study catchments. The main benefit of using
ABC over MIKE URBAN is that ABC provides a posterior
distribution for runoff flow prediction, and therefore associated
uncertainty in predictions can be obtained. In contrast, MIKE
URBAN just provides a point estimate. Based on the results of the
analysis, it appears as though ABC the developed framework
performs well for automatic calibration.

Authors:

• A. Chowdhury
• P. Egodawatta
• J. M. McGree
• A. Goonetilleke

Keywords:

• Automatic calibration framework
• approximate Bayesian computation
• hydrologic and hydraulic modelling
• MIKE URBAN software
• R platform.

References:

[1] C. Zoppou, “Review of urban storm water models”, Environmental
Modelling & Software, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 195-231, 2001.
[2] H. Medsen, G. Wilson, H. C. Ammentorp, “Comparison of different
automated strategies for calibration of rainfall-runoff models”, Journal
of Hydrology, Vol. 261, pp. 48-59, 2002.
[3] D. Pilgrim, “Model evaluation, testing and parameter estimation in
hydrology”, National Symposium on Hydrology, Australian Academy of
Science, Canberra, 1975.
[4] M. URBAN, “Mike Urban Model User Manual”, Danish Hydraulic,
2012.
[5] R. Rasmussen, and G. Hamilton, “An approximate Bayesian
computation approach for estimating parameters of complex
environmental processes in a cellular automata”, Environmental
Modelling & Software, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2012.
[6] K. Csilléry, M. G. Blum, O. E. Gaggiotti, and O. François,
“Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) in practice”, Trends in
ecology & evolution, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 410-418, 2010.
[7] P. Egodawatta, “Translation of small-plot scale pollutant build-up and
wash-off measurements to urban catchment scale”, Queensland
University of Technology, Brisbane, PhD Thesis, 2007.
[8] F. Jabot, T. Faure and N. Dumoulin, “EasyABC: performing efficient
approximate Bayesian computation sampling schemes using R”,
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 684-687, 2013.
[9] P. Torfs, and C. Brauer, “A (very) short introduction to R”, Hydrology
and Quantitative Water Management Group, Wageningen University,
The Netherlands, 2014.
[10] G. O’Loughlin and B. Stack, “DRAINS user manual”, Watercom Pty
Ltd, 2014.
[11] S. C. Service, “Time of Concentration”, In National Engineering
Handbook: Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2010.
[12] K. Csilléry, M. G. Blum, O. E. Gaggiotti, and O. François,
“Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) in practice”, Trends in
ecology & evolution, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 410-418, 2010. [13] A. E. Raftery, and J. Gill, “Bayesian statistics: one-day course for the
American Sociological Association”, Bayesian statistics, pp. 1-61, 2002.
[14] M. A. Beaumont, “Approximate Bayesian computation in evolution and
ecology” Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics, vol. 41,
pp. 379-406, 2010.
[15] M. A. Beaumont, W. Zhang, and D. J. Balding, “Approximate Bayesian
computation in population genetics”, Genetics, vol. 162, no. 4, pp. 2025-
2035, 2002
[16] P. Marjoram, J. Molitor, V. Plagnol, and S. Tavaré, “Markov chain
Monte Carlo without likelihoods”, Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, Vol. 100, No. 26, pp. 15324-15328, 2003.
[17] J. K. Pritchard, M. T. Seielstad, A. Perez-Lezaun, and M. W. Feldman,
“Population growth of human Y chromosomes: a study of Y
chromosome microsatellites”, Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 16,
no. 12, pp. 1791-1798, 1999.
[18] K. Loague and R. E. Green, “Statistical and graphical methods for
evaluating solute transport models: overview and application”, Journal
of contaminant hydrology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 51-73, 1991.
[19] I. Green and D. Stephenson, “Criteria for comparison of single
eventmodels”, Hydrological Sciences Journal, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 395-
411, 1986.
[20] H. J. Henriksen, L. Troldborg, P. Nyegaard, T. O. Sonnenborg, J. C.
Refsgaard and B. Madsen, “Methodology for construction, calibration
and validation of a national hydrological model for Denmark”, Journal
of Hydrology, vol. 280, pp. 52-71, 2003.
[21] G. Maps, Download link: https://www.google.com.au/maps/place/
28%C2%B000%2754.4%22S+153%C2%B020%2710.1%22E/@-
28.0146414,153.3353743,17z/data=!3m1!1e3