Developing a Research Framework for Investigating the Transparency of ePortfolios
This paper describes the evolution of strategies to
evaluate ePortfolios in an online Master-s of Education (M.Ed.)
degree in Instructional Technology. The ePortfolios are required as a
culminating activity for students in the program. By using Web 2.0
tools to develop the ePortfolios, students are able to showcase their
technical skills, integrate national standards, demonstrate their
professional understandings, and reflect on their individual learning.
Faculty have created assessment strategies to evaluate student
achievement of these skills. To further develop ePortfolios as a tool
promoting authentic learning, faculty are moving toward integrating
transparency as part of the evaluation process.
[1] Bollinger, D.U. & Shepherd, C.E. (2010). Student perceptions of
eportfolio integration in online courses. Distance Education, 31(3), 295-
314.
[2] Chatham-Carpenter, A. (2010). Avoiding the pitfalls: Current practices
and recommendations for ePortfolios in higher education. Journal of
Educational Technology Systems, 38(4), 437-456.
[3] Dalsgaard, C & Paulsen, M.F. (2009). Transparency in cooperative
online education. The International Review of Research in Open and
Distance Learning, 10(3). Available at
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/671/1267.
[4] Houston, C. (20120). Digital natives, 21st century school libraries, and
21st century preparation programs: An information affirmation of
Branch and deGroot. School Libraries Worldwide, 18(1), 138-143.
[5] Jones, E. (2010). A professional practice portfolio for quality learning.
Higher Education Quarterly, 64(3), 292-312.
[6] Lieberman, A., & Mace, D.P. (2010). Making practice public: Teacher
learning in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education, 6(1-2), 77-
88.
[7] Lorenzo,G., & Ittelson, J., G. (2005). An overview of e-portfolios. ELI
Paper 1: 2005, EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. Available at
http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3001.pdf.
[8] Lowenthal, P.R., & Thomas, D. (2010). Death to the digital dropbox:
Rethinking student privacy and public performance. EDUCAUSE
Quarterly, 33 (3). Available at
http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterl
yMagazineVolum/DeathtotheDigitalDropboxRethin/213672.
[9] Pecheone, R.L., Pigg, M.J., Chung, R.R., & Souviney, R.J. (2005).
Performance assessment and electronic portfolios: Their effect on
teacher learning and education. Clearing House, 78(4), 164-176.
[10] Poellhuber, B. & Anderson, T. (2011). Distance students- readiness for
social media and collaboration. The International Review of Research in
Open and Distance Learning, 12(6). Available at
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1018/1960.
[11] Tucker, P.D., Stronge, J.H., Gareis, C.R., & Beers, C.S. (2003). The
efficacy of portfolios for teacher evaluation and professional
development: Do they make a difference? Educational Administration
Quarterly, 39(5), 572-602.
[1] Bollinger, D.U. & Shepherd, C.E. (2010). Student perceptions of
eportfolio integration in online courses. Distance Education, 31(3), 295-
314.
[2] Chatham-Carpenter, A. (2010). Avoiding the pitfalls: Current practices
and recommendations for ePortfolios in higher education. Journal of
Educational Technology Systems, 38(4), 437-456.
[3] Dalsgaard, C & Paulsen, M.F. (2009). Transparency in cooperative
online education. The International Review of Research in Open and
Distance Learning, 10(3). Available at
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/671/1267.
[4] Houston, C. (20120). Digital natives, 21st century school libraries, and
21st century preparation programs: An information affirmation of
Branch and deGroot. School Libraries Worldwide, 18(1), 138-143.
[5] Jones, E. (2010). A professional practice portfolio for quality learning.
Higher Education Quarterly, 64(3), 292-312.
[6] Lieberman, A., & Mace, D.P. (2010). Making practice public: Teacher
learning in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education, 6(1-2), 77-
88.
[7] Lorenzo,G., & Ittelson, J., G. (2005). An overview of e-portfolios. ELI
Paper 1: 2005, EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. Available at
http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3001.pdf.
[8] Lowenthal, P.R., & Thomas, D. (2010). Death to the digital dropbox:
Rethinking student privacy and public performance. EDUCAUSE
Quarterly, 33 (3). Available at
http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterl
yMagazineVolum/DeathtotheDigitalDropboxRethin/213672.
[9] Pecheone, R.L., Pigg, M.J., Chung, R.R., & Souviney, R.J. (2005).
Performance assessment and electronic portfolios: Their effect on
teacher learning and education. Clearing House, 78(4), 164-176.
[10] Poellhuber, B. & Anderson, T. (2011). Distance students- readiness for
social media and collaboration. The International Review of Research in
Open and Distance Learning, 12(6). Available at
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1018/1960.
[11] Tucker, P.D., Stronge, J.H., Gareis, C.R., & Beers, C.S. (2003). The
efficacy of portfolios for teacher evaluation and professional
development: Do they make a difference? Educational Administration
Quarterly, 39(5), 572-602.
@article{"International Journal of Business, Human and Social Sciences:64026", author = "Elizabeth Downs and Judith Repman and Kenneth Clark", title = "Developing a Research Framework for Investigating the Transparency of ePortfolios", abstract = "This paper describes the evolution of strategies to
evaluate ePortfolios in an online Master-s of Education (M.Ed.)
degree in Instructional Technology. The ePortfolios are required as a
culminating activity for students in the program. By using Web 2.0
tools to develop the ePortfolios, students are able to showcase their
technical skills, integrate national standards, demonstrate their
professional understandings, and reflect on their individual learning.
Faculty have created assessment strategies to evaluate student
achievement of these skills. To further develop ePortfolios as a tool
promoting authentic learning, faculty are moving toward integrating
transparency as part of the evaluation process.", keywords = "e-learning evaluation, ePortfolios, transparency,
Web 2.0", volume = "6", number = "5", pages = "1003-3", }