Determination of Skills Gap between School-Based Learning and Laboratory-Based Learning in Omar Al-Mukhtar University

This paper provides an identification of the existing practical skills gap between school-based learning (SBL) and laboratory based learning (LBL) in the Computing Department within the Faculty of Science at Omar Al-Mukhtar University in Libya. A survey has been conducted and the first author has elicited the responses of two groups of stakeholders, namely the academic teachers and students.

The primary goal is to review the main strands of evidence available and argue that there is a gap between laboratory and school-based learning in terms of opportunities for experiment and application of skills. In addition, the nature of experimental work within the laboratory at Omar Al-Mukhtar University needs to be reconsidered. Another goal of our study was to identify the reasons for students’ poor performance in the laboratory and to determine how this poor performance can be eliminated by the modification of teaching methods. Bloom’s taxonomy of learning outcomes has been applied in order to classify questions and problems into categories, and the survey was formulated with reference to third year Computing Department students. Furthermore, to discover students’ opinions with respect to all the issues, an exercise was conducted. The survey provided questions related to what the students had learnt and how well they had learnt. We were also interested in feedback on how to improve the course and the final question provided an opportunity for such feedback.





References:
[1] J. Carnduff and N. Reid, Enhancing undergraduate chemistry
laboratories, pre-laboratory and post-laboratory exercises, examples
and advice, London: Education Department, Royal Society of
Chemistry, 2003.
[2] A.H. Johnstone, “Chemistry teaching—science or alchemy?” Brasted
Lecture, Journal of Chemical Education, 74, 1997, pp. 262-268.
[3] D. S. Domin, “A review of laboratory instruction styles”, Journal of
Chemical Education, 76, 1999, pp. 543-547.
[4] J. Garratt, “Virtual investigations: ways to accelerate experience,”
University Chemistry Education, 1, 1997, pp. 19-27.
[5] K. Henige, “Undergraduate student attitudes and perceptions toward
low- and high-level inquiry exercise physiology teaching laboratory
experiences,” Advances in Physiology Education (2011)
http://advan.physiology.org/content/35/2/197.short.
[6] J. Kopplin, Computer Science Lab, 2010, http://
www.computersciencelab.com/.
[7] Omar Al-Mukhtar University, office of University Computer Services
access, 2013, available at http://www.omu.edu.ly/
[8] UNESCO, Information and communication technologies in teacher
education – A planning guide, 2006.
[9] T. Kenan, “The Barriers of E-learning in higher education in Libya,”
MSc Thesis, UK, University of Salford, March 2009.
[10] Othman,. A, Pislaru, C. and Impes,. A.(2013), “Improving Students’
ICT Skills By Using A Novel Framework For A Lab-Based Learning
Module. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on e-
Learning (ICEL2013), Ostrava, Czech Republic, pp. 106 - 113.
[11] Othman, A., Pislaru, C. and Impes, A. (2013) “Attitudes of Libyan
students towards ICT’s application and e-learning in the UK”.
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on e-Learning
(ICEL2013), Ostrava, Czech Republic, pp. 123 – 129, ISBN 978-0-
9853483-9-7
[12] Artemi, M., Ajit, K.(2009). “A SWOT Analysis of E-Learning Model
for the Libyan Educational Institutions”, The 3rd National Conference of
Basic Science 25-27/4/2009 Aljabal Algharbi University Gharian –
Libya
[13] A. Alhawat, “Effectiveness of higher education infrastructures: Libyan
model,” Vocational, Cultural and Academic Bulletin (special issue on
Libyan HE), General syndication of university staff members, Tripoli,
Libya, 9 March 2005.
[14] B. Bloom, B. Mesia and D. Krathwohl, Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives (two vols: The Affective Domain and The Cognitive
Domain), New York: David McKay, 1964.