CPT Pore Water Pressure Correlations with PDA to Identify Pile Drivability Problem

At certain depths during large diameter displacement
pile driving, rebound well over 0.25 inches was experienced,
followed by a small permanent-set during each hammer blow. High
pile rebound (HPR) soils may stop the pile driving and results in a
limited pile capacity. In some cases, rebound leads to pile damage,
delaying the construction project, and the requiring foundations
redesign. HPR was evaluated at seven Florida sites, during driving of
square precast, prestressed concrete piles driven into saturated, fine
silty to clayey sands and sandy clays. Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA)
deflection versus time data recorded during installation, was used to
develop correlations between cone penetrometer (CPT) pore-water
pressures, pile displacements and rebound. At five sites where piles
experienced excessive HPR with minimal set, the pore pressure
yielded very high positive values of greater than 20 tsf. However, at
the site where the pile rebounded, followed by an acceptable
permanent-set, the measured pore pressure ranged between 5 and 20
tsf. The pore pressure exhibited values of less than 5 tsf at the site
where no rebound was noticed. In summary, direct correlations
between CPTu pore pressure and rebound were produced, allowing
identification of soils that produce HPR.

• Fauzi Jarushi
• Paul Cosentino
• Edward Kalajian
• Hadeel Dekhn

• CPTu
• pore water pressure
• pile rebound.

[1] Bingjian, Zhu. 2011. Study of the pore water pressure variation rule in
saturated soft soil caused by prestressed concrete pile penetration.
Electric Technology and Civil Engineering Conference, 22-24 April
2011, Taizhou, China, pp.756-59.
[2] Chin Fong, Y. 2010. Identifying soils the produce high pile rebound.
Technical report, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida.
[3] Cosentino, P. Kalajian, E. Misilo, T, Chin Fong, Y. Davis, K., Jarushi F.,
Bleakley A., Hussein M. H., and Bates, Z. 2010. Design phase
identification of high pile rebound soils. Technical report, Contract
BDK81 Work Order 977-01, Florida Department of Transportation.
[4] Eigenbrod, K.D., and T. Issigonis.1996. Pore-water pressures in soft to
firm clay during driving of piles into underlying dense sand. Canadian
Geotechnical Journal 33(2):209-218.
[5] FDOT.2010. Standard Specification for Road and Bridges Section 455.
[6] Hölscher, P. 1995. Dynamical response of saturated and dry soils. PhD
thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
[7] Hussein, M.H., Woerner, W. A., Sharp, M. and Hwang, C. 2006. Pile
driveability and bearing capacity in high-rebound soils. American
Society of Civil Engineers GEO Congress CD-ROM, Atlanta, GA.
[8] Likins, Garland E. 1983. Pile installation difficulties in soils with large
quakes. In G.G. Globe, editors, Proceedings of Symposium 6 at the 1983
ASCE Convention, Philadelphia, May 18, 1983. ASCE Geotechnical
Engineering Division.
[9] Murrell, Kyle L., Canivan, Gregory J., Camp, William M. III. 2008.
High and low strain testing of bouncing piles. Proceedings of the 33rd
Annual and 11th International Conference on Deep Foundations. Article
#1603; publication #85.
[10] Robertson, P. K., Woeller, D., and Gillespie, D. 1990. Evaluation of
excess pore Pressures and drainage conditions around driven piles using
the cone penetration test with poreressure measurements. Canadian
Geotechnical Journal, 27(2):249-254
[11] Jackson, A. Pile Jacking in Sand and Silt. Cambridge University
Engineering Department. 2008.