Computer-aided Sequence Planning of Shearing Operations in Progressive Dies

This paper aims to study the methodology of building the knowledge of planning adequate punches in order to complete the task of strip layout for shearing processes, using progressive dies. The proposed methodology uses die design rules and characteristics of different types of punches to classify them into five groups: prior use (the punches must be used first), posterior use (must be used last), compatible use (may be used together), sequential use (certain punches must precede some others) and simultaneous use (must be used together). With these five groups of punches, the searching space of feasible designs will be greatly reduced, and superimposition becomes a more effective method of punch layout. The superimposition scheme will generate many feasible solutions, an evaluation function based on number of stages, moment balancing and strip stability is developed for helping designers to find better solutions.





References:
[1] Korneli Michael, 1999. Designing progressive dies - Reviewing the
basics of progressive tooling. Stamping Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1,
January/February
[2] Lange Kurt, 1991. Handbook of Metal Forming,. NY: McGraw-Hill
[3] Paguin J. R. and Crowley R. E., 1987. Die Design Fundaments, NY:
Industrial Press
[4] Wilson F. W. and Harvey P. H., 1963. Die Design Handbook, NY:
McGraw-Hill
[5] Schubert P. B., 1967. Die Methods: Design, Fabrication, Maintenance,
and Application, NY: Industrial Press
[6] Schaffer G., 1971. Computing design of progressive die. American
Machinist, No. 22, pp. 73-75
[7] Nakahara S., Toshio K., Tamura K., Asuke F., Soda C. and Nakamura T.,
1978. Computer aided progressive die design. Proceedings of the 19th
Machine Tool Design Research Conference, London: McMillan, pp.
171-176
[8] Bergstrom K., Kivivuori S., Osenius S. and Korhonen A., 1988.
Computer aided design of progressive die. Chersot In J. L. and Ohate E.
(eds.), Modeling of Metal Forming Processes, NY: Kluwer Academic
Publishers, pp. 155-162
[9] Choi J. C., Kim B. M. and Kim Chul, 1999. An Automated Progressive
Process Planning and Die Design and Working System for Blanking or
Piercing and Bending of a Sheet Metal Product. International Journal of
Advanced Manufacturing Technology, No. 15, pp.485-497
[10] Thanapandi C. M.,Walairacht A., and Ohara S., 2001. Genetic Algorithm
for bending process in sheet metal industry. IEEE Electrical and
Computer Conference, Toronto, Vol. 2, pp.957-962
[11] Tor S. B., Britton G. A. and Zhang W. Y., 2005. Development of an
object-oriented blackboard model for stamping process planning in
progressive die design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 16,
pp.499-513
[12] Zhang W. Y., Tor S. B. and Britton G. A., 2004. A Hybrid Intelligent
System for Stamping Process Planning in Progressive Die Design.
Innovation in Manufacturing Systems and Technology, January 2004,
Available from: Http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/3905 [accessed 20 Mar
2010]
[13] Ong S. K., DeVin L. J., Nee A. Y. C. and Kals H. J. J., 1997. Fuzzy set
theory applied to bend sequencing for sheet metal bending. Journal of
Materials Processing Technology, No. 69, pp.29-36.
[14] Lin Z. C. and Chang J. M., 2001. Application of the torque equilibrium
method in the study of offset displacement in the upper and lower dies in
a shearing-cut progressive die. International Journal of Material
Production Technology, No. 16, pp. 528-544.