Attributions by Team Members for Team Outcomes in Finnish Working Life

This study focuses on teamwork in Finnish working life. Through a wide cross-section of teams the study examines the causes to which team members attribute the outcomes of their teams. Qualitative data was collected from 314 respondents. They wrote 616 stories to describe memorable experiences of success and failure in teamwork. The stories revealed 1930 explanations. The findings indicate that both favorable and unfavorable team outcomes are perceived as being caused by the characteristics of team members, relationships between members, team communication, team structure, team goals, team leadership, and external forces. The types represent different attribution levels in the context of organizational teamwork.

Authors:

• Maarit Valo
• Pertti Hurme

Keywords:

• Team
• teamwork
• team outcomes
• workplace
• working life.

References:

[1] Vašková, R., 2007. Team work and high performance work organisation.
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working
Conditions. Available at
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/ewco/reports/TN0507TR01/TN0507T
R01_2.htm (accessed April 14, 2010).
[2] Lehto, A.-M., 2004. Finnish quality of work life surveys. European
Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
Available at
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/ewco/surveys/FI0410SR01/FI0410SR0
1.htm (accessed April 14, 2010).
[3] European Working Conditions Survey, 2005. Fourth European Working
Conditions Survey. European Working Conditions Observatory
(EWCO). Available at
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/ewco/surveys/ewcs2005/index.htm
(accessed April 14, 2010).
[4] Lehto, A.-M., 2009. Changes in the quality of working life over four
decades. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and
Working Conditions. Available at
www.eurofound.europa.eu/ewco/surveyreports/FI0911019D/FI0911019
D_2.htm (accessed April 14, 2010).
[5] Frey, L. R., 2003. ÔÇÿIntroduction: Group communication in context:
Studying bona fide groups- in Group communication in context: Studies
of bona fide groups, 2nd edn. L. R. Frey (ed.), 1-20. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
[6] Gouran, D. S., 1999. ÔÇÿCommunication in groups: The emergence and
evolution of a field of study- in The handbook of group communication
theory and research. L. R. Frey, D. S. Gouran, and M. S. Poole (eds), 3-
36. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[7] Poole, M. S., A. B. Hollingshead, J. McGrath, R. Moreland, and J.
Rohrbaugh, 2005. ÔÇÿInterdisciplinary perspectives on small groups- in
Theories of small groups: Interdisciplinary perspectives. M. S. Poole
and A. B. Hollingshead (eds), 1-20. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[8] Wittenbaum, G. M., A. B. Hollingshead, P. B. Paulus, R. Y. Hirokawa,
D. G. Ancona, R. S. Peterson, K. A. Jehn, and K. Yoon, 2004. ÔÇÿThe
functional perspective as a lens for understanding groups-. Small Group
Research 35/1: 17-43.
[9] Cohen, S. G., and D. E. Bailey, 1997. ÔÇÿWhat makes teams work: Group
effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite-.
Journal of Management 23/3: 239-290.
[10] Lemieux-Charles, L., and W. L. McGuire, 2006. ÔÇÿWhat do we know
about health care team effectiveness? A review of the literature-.
Medical Care Research and Review 63/3: 263-300.
[11] Barge, J. K., and R.Y. Hirokawa, 1989. ÔÇÿTowards a communication
competency model of leadership-. Small Group Research 20/2: 167-189.
[12] Hollingshead, A. B., G. C. Jacobsohn, and S. J. Beck, 2007. ÔÇÿMotives
and goals in context: A strategic analysis of information-sharing groups-
in Social communication. K. Fiedler (ed.), 257-280. New York:
Psychology Press.
[13] Larson, C., and F. LaFasto, 1989. TeamWork: What must go right / what
can go wrong. London: Sage.
[14] Stasser, G., L. A. Taylor, and C. Hanna, 1989. ÔÇÿInformation sampling in
structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups-.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57/1: 67-78.
[15] De Dreu, C. K., 2007. ÔÇÿCooperative outcome interdependence, task
reflexivity, and team effectiveness: A motivated information processing
perspective-. Journal of Applied Psychology 92/3: 628-638.
[16] Kang, H.-R., H.-D. Yang, and C. Rowley, 2006. ÔÇÿFactors in team
effectiveness: Cognitive and demographic similarities of software
development team members-. Human Relations 59/12: 1681-1710.
[17] Lim, B. C., and K. J. Klein, 2006. ÔÇÿTeam mental models and team
performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity
and accuracy-. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 27: 403-418.
[18] Chou, L.-F., A.-C. Wang, T.-Y. Wang, M.-P. Huang, B.-S. Cheng, 2008.
ÔÇÿShared work values and team member effectiveness: The mediation of
trustfulness and trustworthiness-. Human Relations 61/12: 1713-1742.
[19] Oetzel, J. G., and K. Bolton-Oetzel, 1997. ÔÇÿExploring the relationship
between self-construal and dimensions of group effectiveness-.
Management Communication Quarterly 10/3: 289-316.
[20] Gevers, J. M. P., and M. A. G. Peeters, 2008. ÔÇÿA pleasure working
together? The effects of dissimilarity in team member conscientiousness
on team temporal processes and individual satisfaction-. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, DOI: 10.1002/job.544
[21] Sonnentag, S. and J. Volmer, 2009. ÔÇÿIndividual-level predictors of taskrelated
teamwork processes: The role of expertise and self-efficacy in
team meatings-. Group & Organization Management 34/1: 37-66.
[22] Z├írraga, C. and J. Bonache, 2005. ÔÇÿThe impact of team atmosphere on
knowledge outcomes in self-managed teams-. Organization Studies
26/5: 661-681.
[23] Katzenbach, J. R., and D. K. Smith, 1993. The wisdom of teams:
Creating the high-performance organization. Boston, MA: Harvard
Business School.
[24] Child, J. T., and M. Shumate, 2007. ÔÇÿThe impact of communal
knowledge repositories and people-based knowledge management on
perceptions of team effectiveness-. Communication Quarterly 21/1: 29-
54.
[25] Kuhn, T., and M. S. Poole, 2000. ÔÇÿDo conflict management styles affect
group decision making?-. Human Communication Research 26/4: 558-
591.
[26] Coopman, S., 2001. ÔÇÿDemocracy, performance, and outcomes in
interdisciplinary health care teams-. Journal of Business Communication
38/3: 261-284.
[27] Hirokawa, R. Y., and K. M. Rost, 1992. ÔÇÿEffective group decision
making in organizations: Field test of the vigilant interaction theory-.
Management Communication Quarterly 5/3: 267-288.
[28] Shah, P. P., K. T. Dirks, and N. Chervany, 2006. ÔÇÿThe multiple pathways
of high performing groups: The interaction of social networks and group
processes-. Journal of Organizational Behavior 27/3: 299-317.
[29] Styhre, A., J. Roth, and A. Ingelg├Ñrd, 2002. ÔÇÿCare of the other:
Knowledge-creation through care in professional teams-. Scandinavian
Journal of Management 18/4: 503-520.
[30] Hirschfeld, R. R., M. H. Jordan, H. S. Feild, W. F. Giles, and A. A.
Armenakis, 2006. ÔÇÿBecoming team players: Team members- mastery of
teamwork knowledge as a predictor of team task proficiency and
observed teamwork effectiveness-. Journal of Applied Psychology 91/2:
467-474.
[31] Hawkins, K. W., and B. P. Fillion, 1999. ÔÇÿPerceived communication skill
needs for work groups-. Communication Research Reports 16/2: 167-
174.
[32] Hollingshead, A. B., G. M. Wittenbaum, P. B. Paulus, R. Y. Hirokawa,
D. G. Ancona, R. S. Peterson, K. A. Jehn, and K. Yoon, 2005. ÔÇÿA look at
groups from the functional perspective- in Theories of small groups:
Interdisciplinary perspectives. M. S. Poole and A. B. Hollingshead
(eds.), 21-62. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[33] Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln, 2005. ÔÇÿIntroduction: The discipline
and practice of qualitative research- in The Sage handbook of qualitative
research, 3rd edn. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), 1-32. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
[34] Hackman, J. R., and R. Wageman, 2005. ÔÇÿA theory of team coaching-.
Academy of Management Review 30/2: 269-287.
[35] Lester, S. W., B. M. Meglino, and M. A. Korsgaard, 2002. ÔÇÿThe
antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal
investigation of newly formed work groups-. Academy of Management
Journal 45/2: 352-368.
[36] Gipson, C. B., C. D. Cooper, and J. A. Conger, 2009. ÔÇÿDo you see what
we see? The complex effects of perceptual distance between leaders and
teams-. Journal of Applied Psychology 94/1: 62-76.
[37] Heider, F., 1958. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York:
Wiley.
[38] Kelley, H. H.,1972. ÔÇÿAttribution in social interaction- in Attribution:
Perceiving the causes of behavior. E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H.
Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins and B. Weiner (eds), 1-26. Morristown,
NJ: General Learning Press.
[39] Weary, G., M. A. Stanley, and J. H. Harvey, 1989. Attribution. New
York: Springer Verlag.
[40] Wallace, D. M., and V. B. Hinsz, 2009. ÔÇÿGroup members as actors and
observers in attributions of responsibility for group performance-. Small
Group Research 40/1: 52-71.
[41] Hirokawa, R. Y., and J. Keyton, 1995. ÔÇÿPerceived facilitators and
inhibitors of effectiveness in organizational work teams-. Management
Communication Quarterly 8/4: 424-446.
[42] Hirokawa, R. Y., D. DeGooyer, and K. Valde, 2000. ÔÇÿUsing narratives to
study task group effectiveness-. Small Group Research 31/5: 573-591.
[43] Clandinin, D. J., and F M. Connelly, 2000. Narrative inquiry:
Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
[44] Jensen, K. B., 2002. A handbook of media and communication research:
Qualitative and quantitative methodologies. London: Routledge.
[45] Frey, L. R., C. H. Botan, and G. L. Kreps, 2000. Investigating
communication: An introduction to research methods, 2nd edn. Boston:
Allyn and Bacon.
[46] Lindlof, T. R., and B. C. Taylor, 2002. Qualitative communication
research methods, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[47] Sillars, A., 1980. ÔÇÿAttributions and communication in roommate
conflicts-. Communication Monographs 47/3: 180-200.
[48] Poole, M. S., J. Keyton, and L. R. Frey, 1999. ÔÇÿGroup communication
methodology: Issues and considerations- in The handbook of group
communication theory & research. L. R. Frey, D. Gouran and M. S.
Poole (eds), 92-111. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[49] Bierhoff, H.-W., 1989. Person perception and attribution. Berlin:
Springer-Verlag.
[50] Fiske, S. T., and S. E. Taylor, 1984. Social cognition. Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley.
[51] Roloff, M. E., and C. R. Berger, editors, 1982. Social cognition and
communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
[52] Hildreth, P., and C. Kimble, editors, 2004. Knowledge networks.
Innovation through communities of practice. Hershey, PA: Idea Group
Publishing.