Academic Staff Perceptions of the Value of the Elements of an Online Learning Environment

Based on 276 responses from academic staff in an evaluation of an online learning environment (OLE), this paper identifies those elements of the OLE that were most used and valued by staff, those elements of the OLE that staff most wanted to see improved, and those factors that most contributed to staff perceptions that the use of the OLE enhanced their teaching. The most used and valued elements were core functions, including accessing unit information, accessing lecture/tutorial/lab notes, and reading online discussions. The elements identified as most needing attention related to online assessment: submitting assignments, managing assessment items, and receiving feedback on assignments. Staff felt that using the OLE enhanced their teaching when they were satisfied that their students were able to access and use their learning materials, and when they were satisfied with the professional development they received and were confident with their ability to teach with the OLE.

Authors:

• Stuart Palmer
• Dale Holt

Keywords:

• Academic staff
• Distance education
• Evaluation
• Online learning environment.

References:

[1] D. M. Holt and D. J. Thompson, "Responding to the technological
imperative: The experience of one open and distance education
institution," Distance Education: An International Journal, vol. 16, pp.
43-64, 1995.
[2] Deakin University. (2009, November 2). Online Technologies in
Courses and Units - Procedure [Online]. Available:
http://theguide.deakin.edu.au/TheDeakinGuide.nsf/7264c32fe71924374a
2566f3000a65de/4d252055c8941cfbca256e64000f8bb3
[3] T. Browne, M. Jenkins, and R. Walker, "A longitudinal perspective
regarding the use of VLEs by higher education institutions in the United
Kingdom," Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 14, pp. 177-192,
2006.
[4] Y. Baek, J. Jung, and B. Kim, "What makes teachers use technology in
the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology
with a Korean sample," Computers & Education, vol. 50, pp. 224-234,
2008.
[5] R. West, G. Waddoups, and C. Graham, "Understanding the experiences
of instructors as they adopt a course management system," Educational
Technology Research and Development, vol. 55, pp. 1-26, 2007.
[6] A. Albirini, "Teachers' attitudes toward information and communication
technologies: the case of Syrian EFL teachers," Computers & Education,
vol. 47, pp. 373-398, 2006.
[7] H. Mahdizadeh, H. Biemans, and M. Mulder, "Determining factors of
the use of e-learning environments by university teachers," Computers &
Education, vol. 51, pp. 142-154, 2008.
[8] W. H. Dutton, P. H. Cheong, and A. Park, "An Ecology of Constraints
on e-Learning in Higher Education: The Case of a Virtual Learning
Environment," Prometheus, vol. 22, pp. 131-149, 2004.
[9] M. F. Salinas, "From Dewey to Gates: A model to integrate
psychoeducational principles in the selection and use of instructional
technology," Computers & Education, vol. 50, pp. 652-660, 2008.
[10] G. H. Jones and B. H. Jones, "A Comparison of Teacher and Student
Attitudes Concerning Use and Effectiveness of Web-based Course
Management Software," Educational Technology & Society, vol. 8, pp.
125-135, 2005.
[11] R. Woods, J. D. Baker, and D. Hopper, "Hybrid structures: Faculty use
and perception of web-based courseware as a supplement to face-to-face
instruction," The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 7, pp. 281-297,
2004.
[12] Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations. (2009,
November 2). Higher Education Statistics Collection [Online].
Available:
http://www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Publications/HEStatistics/Pa
ges/HEStatisticsCollection.aspx
[13] C. Cook, F. Heath, and R. L. Thompson, "A Meta-Analysis of Response
Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys," Educational and
Psychological Measurement, vol. 60, pp. 821-836, 2000.
[14] H. Aigbedo and R. Parameswaran, "Importance-performance analysis
for improving quality of campus food service," International Journal of
Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 21, pp. 876-896, 2004.
[15] D. J. Nicol and D. Macfarlane-Dick, "Formative assessment and selfregulated
learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback
practice," Studies in Higher Education, vol. 31, pp. 199-218, 2006.
[16] M. Yorke, "Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Moves Towards
Theory and the Enhancement of Pedagogic Practice," Higher Education,
vol. 45, pp. 477-501, 2003.
[17] G. Morgan, Faculty Use of Course Management Systems - ERS0302.
Boulder: EDUCAUSE, 2003.
[18] R. G. Wingard, "Classroom Teaching Changes in Web-Enhanced
Courses: A Multi-Institutional Study," EDUCAUSE Quarterly, vol. 27,
pp. 26-35, 2004.
[19] G. Brown, C. B. Myers, and S. Roy, "Formal course design and the
student learning experience," Journal of Asynchronous Learning
Networks, vol. 7, pp. 66-76, 2003.
[20] M. K. Tallent-Runnels, J. A. Thomas, W. Y. Lan, S. Cooper, T. C.
Ahern, S. M. Shaw, and X. Liu, "Teaching Courses Online: A Review of
the Research," Review of Educational Research, vol. 76, pp. 93-135,
2006.
[21] G. Rumble, "The costs and costing of networked learning," Journal of
Asynchronous Learning Networks, vol. 5, pp. 75-96, 2001.
[22] M. J. Spector, "Time demands in online instruction," Distance
Education, vol. 26, pp. 5 - 27, 2005.
[23] F. Herzberg, "The Motivation-Hygiene Concept and Problems of
Manpower," Personnel Administration, vol. 27, pp. 3-7, 1964.
[24] K. Georgouli, I. Skalkidis, and P. Guerreiro, "A Framework for
Adopting LMS to Introduce e-Learning in a Traditional Course,"
Educational Technology & Society, vol. 11, pp. 227-240, 2008.