A Training Course Development to Promote Learning Activities of 2nd Year, Faculty of Education Students using Multiple Intelligences Theory
This research aims to develop and evaluate a training
course to promote learning activities of 2nd year, Suan Sunandha
Rajabhat University, faculty of education students using multiple
intelligences theory. The process is divided into two phases: Phase 1
development of training course to promote learning activities
consisting of principles, objectives of the course, structure, training
duration, content, training materials, training activities, media
training, monitoring, measurement and evaluation quality of the
course. Phase 2 evaluation efficiency of training course was to use
the improved curriculum with experimental group which is 2nd year,
Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, faculty of education students
was drawn randomly 152 students. The experimental pattern was
randomized Control Group Pre-Test Post-Test Design, Analysis Data
by t-Test with the software SPFSS for Windows. Research has shown
that: 1). the ability of teaching and learning according to the theory of
multiple intelligences after training is higher than before training
significantly in statistic at .01 level, 2). The satisfaction of students
to the training courses was overall at the highest level.
[1] D. Baron, & W.B. Harold, Evaluation technique for classroom
teacher. New York: McGraw - Hill Book Company, Inc 1995.
[2] E. A. Alexandra, The Effect of Constructionism Learning in the Social
Subject on Student Achievement and Analysis Thinking. Dissertation
Abstracts International. 51 (November) 2004.
[3] G. O. Young, "Synthetic Ministry of Education" Conceptual Approach
and Assessment of a New Alternative According to the Fundamental
Education Program, Bangkok. 2001.
[4] H. Gardner, August 15. Intelligence in seven steps. (Online). Available
URL:
http://www.newhorizons.org/future/Creating_the_Future/crfut_gardner.h
tml2005.
[5] H. Taba, Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice. New York:
Brace & world , Inc.1972.
[6] K. Somchart, Effective Technique in Organizing Training.
Bangkok.2003.
[7] L. Seri, Administrative skill and behavior of primary schools- principles
after a training, Thesis of Graduate school, Silpakorn University.1999.
[8] Ministry of Education. Conceptual Approach and Assessment of a New
Alternative According to the Fundamental Education Program,
Bangkok.2001.
[9] Ministry of Education Fundamental Education Program, year 2008 No.2,
Bangkok. 2009.
[10] R. N.Rinee, Research shown Thai Children are Growing and Stupid.
Matichon newspaper, p.18.2003.
[11] R. Peera, Application of the Multiple Intelligences Theory to Reform
Learning Process, Bangkok.2001.
[12] S. Fred, The Constructionism Learning in the Music, Art to
Development of Student-s Relationship. . Dissertation Abstracts
International. 67 (June) 2005.
[13] S. Narongrit, Particular Group Teaching Procedure. Wittayacharn Vol.4,
April 1996.
[14] V. Panthanee, Teaching and Learning Thai:Problem and Solution,
Bangkok.1999.
[1] D. Baron, & W.B. Harold, Evaluation technique for classroom
teacher. New York: McGraw - Hill Book Company, Inc 1995.
[2] E. A. Alexandra, The Effect of Constructionism Learning in the Social
Subject on Student Achievement and Analysis Thinking. Dissertation
Abstracts International. 51 (November) 2004.
[3] G. O. Young, "Synthetic Ministry of Education" Conceptual Approach
and Assessment of a New Alternative According to the Fundamental
Education Program, Bangkok. 2001.
[4] H. Gardner, August 15. Intelligence in seven steps. (Online). Available
URL:
http://www.newhorizons.org/future/Creating_the_Future/crfut_gardner.h
tml2005.
[5] H. Taba, Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice. New York:
Brace & world , Inc.1972.
[6] K. Somchart, Effective Technique in Organizing Training.
Bangkok.2003.
[7] L. Seri, Administrative skill and behavior of primary schools- principles
after a training, Thesis of Graduate school, Silpakorn University.1999.
[8] Ministry of Education. Conceptual Approach and Assessment of a New
Alternative According to the Fundamental Education Program,
Bangkok.2001.
[9] Ministry of Education Fundamental Education Program, year 2008 No.2,
Bangkok. 2009.
[10] R. N.Rinee, Research shown Thai Children are Growing and Stupid.
Matichon newspaper, p.18.2003.
[11] R. Peera, Application of the Multiple Intelligences Theory to Reform
Learning Process, Bangkok.2001.
[12] S. Fred, The Constructionism Learning in the Music, Art to
Development of Student-s Relationship. . Dissertation Abstracts
International. 67 (June) 2005.
[13] S. Narongrit, Particular Group Teaching Procedure. Wittayacharn Vol.4,
April 1996.
[14] V. Panthanee, Teaching and Learning Thai:Problem and Solution,
Bangkok.1999.
@article{"International Journal of Business, Human and Social Sciences:56336", author = "Chaiwat Waree and Kalanyoo Petcharaporn", title = "A Training Course Development to Promote Learning Activities of 2nd Year, Faculty of Education Students using Multiple Intelligences Theory", abstract = "This research aims to develop and evaluate a training
course to promote learning activities of 2nd year, Suan Sunandha
Rajabhat University, faculty of education students using multiple
intelligences theory. The process is divided into two phases: Phase 1
development of training course to promote learning activities
consisting of principles, objectives of the course, structure, training
duration, content, training materials, training activities, media
training, monitoring, measurement and evaluation quality of the
course. Phase 2 evaluation efficiency of training course was to use
the improved curriculum with experimental group which is 2nd year,
Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, faculty of education students
was drawn randomly 152 students. The experimental pattern was
randomized Control Group Pre-Test Post-Test Design, Analysis Data
by t-Test with the software SPFSS for Windows. Research has shown
that: 1). the ability of teaching and learning according to the theory of
multiple intelligences after training is higher than before training
significantly in statistic at .01 level, 2). The satisfaction of students
to the training courses was overall at the highest level.", keywords = "A training course, learning activities, multiple intelligences.", volume = "7", number = "1", pages = "111-5", }