A Multi Objective Optimization Approach to Optimize Vehicle Ride and Handling Characteristics

Vehicle suspension design must fulfill some conflicting criteria. Among those is ride comfort which is attained by minimizing the acceleration transmitted to the sprung mass, via suspension spring and damper. Also good handling of a vehicle is a desirable property which requires stiff suspension and therefore is in contrast with a vehicle with good ride. Among the other desirable features of a suspension is the minimization of the maximum travel of suspension. This travel which is called suspension working space in vehicle dynamics literature is also a design constraint and it favors good ride. In this research a full car 8 degrees of freedom model has been developed and the three above mentioned criteria, namely: ride, handling and working space has been adopted as objective functions. The Multi Objective Programming (MOP) discipline has been used to find the Pareto Front and some reasoning used to chose a design point between these non dominated points of Pareto Front.




References:
[1] Guide for Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration,
2nd ed., International Standard 2631-1978(E), International
Organization for Standardization, 1978.
[2] Emanuele Guglielmino, et al (2008) Semi Active Suspension Control.
Springer-Verlag London.
[3] Mohamed Bouazara, Marc J. Richard, "An optimization method
designed to improve 3-D vehicle comfort and road holding capability
through the use of active and semi-active suspensions" Eur. J. Mech.
A/Solids 20 (2001) 509-520.
[4] Coello Coello, C.A., Van Veldhuizen, D.A., and Lamont, G.B. (2002)
Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-objective problems. Kluwer
Academic Publishers, NY.
[5] N. Srinivas and Kalyanmoy Deb. Multiobjective Optimization Using
Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms. Evolutionary
Computation, 2(3):221 - 248, 1994.
[6] Kalyanmoy Deb, Amrit Pratap, Sameer Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan. A
Fast Elitist Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE
Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2):182 - 197, April 2002.