A Learner-Centred or Artefact-Centred Classroom? Impact of Technology, Artefacts, and Environment on Task Processes in an English as a Foreign Language Classroom

This preliminary study attempts to see if a learning
environment influences instructor’s teaching strategies and learners’
in-class activities in a foreign language class at a university in Japan.
The class under study was conducted in a computer room, while the
majority of classes of the same course were offered in traditional
classrooms without computers. The study also sees if the unplanned
blended learning environment, enhanced, or worked against, in
achieving course goals, by paying close attention to in-class artefacts,
such as computers. In the macro-level analysis, the course syllabus
and weekly itinerary of the course were looked at; and in the microlevel
analysis, nonhuman actors in their environments were named
and analyzed to see how they influenced the learners’ task processes.
The result indicated that students were heavily influenced by the
presence of computers, which lead them to disregard some aspects of
intended learning objectives.

• Nobue T. Ellis

• Computer-assisted language learning
• actor-network theory
• English as a foreign language
• task-based teaching.

<p>[1] C. Chapelle, &ldquo;Is network-based learning CALL?,&rdquo; in Network-based
Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice, M. Warschauer and R.
Kern, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 204-228.
[2] R. Kern and M. Warschuer, &ldquo;Introduction: Theory and practice of
network-based language teaching,&rdquo;in Network-based Language
Teaching: Concepts and Practice, M. Warschauer and R. Kern, Eds.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 1-19.
[3] M. Levy, Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Context and
Conceptualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[4] M. Callon (1986). &ldquo;Some elements of a sociology of translation:
Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay,&rdquo; in
Power, Action and Belief: a New Sociology of Knowledge? ,J. Law, Ed.,
London: Routledge, 1986, pp.196-223.
[5] B. Latour, We Have Never Been Modern. Brighton, Harvester
Wheatsheaf, 1993.
[6] J. Law, &ldquo;Power, discretion and strategy, &rdquo;in A Sociology of Monsters?
Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, J. Law, Ed. London,
Routledge. 1991, pp. 165-191.
[7] T. Fenwick and R. Edward, Actor-Network Theory in Education.
Routledge: London, 2010, p. 3.
[8] W.-M. Roth, &ldquo;Knowledge diffusion in a grade 4-5 classroom during a
unit on civil engineering: an analysis of a classroom community in terms
of its changing resources and practices.&rdquo;Cognition and Instruction, vol.
14, no. 2, pp. 179-220, 1996.
[9] S. Barab, K. E. Hay, and L. C. Yamagata-Lynch, &ldquo;Constructing
networks of action-relevant episodes: an in situ research methodology,
&rdquo;The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 10, nos. 1-2, pp. 63-112,
1999.
[10] M. Swain, &ldquo;The output hypothesis: just speaking and writing aren&#39;t
enough,&rdquo;The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne
des languesvivantes, vol. 50, no.1, pp. 158-164, 1993.
[11] M. Swain and S. Lapkin, &ldquo;Interaction and second language learning: two
adolescent French immersion students working together,&rdquo; The Modern
Language Journal, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 320-337, 1998.
[12] J. P. Lantolf, &ldquo;Second language learning as a mediated process,
&rdquo;Language Teaching, vol. 33, pp. 79-96, 2000.</p>