A Bootstrap's Reliability Measure on Tests of Hypotheses

Bootstrapping has gained popularity in different tests of hypotheses as an alternative in using asymptotic distribution if one is not sure of the distribution of the test statistic under a null hypothesis. This method, in general, has two variants – the parametric and the nonparametric approaches. However, issues on reliability of this method always arise in many applications. This paper addresses the issue on reliability by establishing a reliability measure in terms of quantiles with respect to asymptotic distribution, when this is approximately correct. The test of hypotheses used is Ftest. The simulated results show that using nonparametric bootstrapping in F-test gives better reliability than parametric bootstrapping with relatively higher degrees of freedom.





References:
[1] S. Amiri, D. von Rosen, and S. Zwanzig, "On the comparison of
parametric and nonparametric bootstrap," Uppsala University
Department of Mathematics Report 2008:15. Uppsala University,
Uppsala, Sweden, 2008, unpublished.
[2] R. Barlow and F. Proschan, Mathematical Theory of Reliability, SIAM
Classics edition, 1996, pp. 5-6.
[3] A. Davison and D. Hinkley, Bootstrap Methods and their Applications.
Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 1997, ch. 1.
[4] P. Good and J. Hardin, Common Errors in Statistics: How to Avoid
Them. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
[5] J. MacKinnon, "Bootstrap hypothesis testing," Queen-s Economics
Department Working Paper No. 1127, Queen-s University, Ontario,
Canada, 2007, unpublished.
[6] J. MacKinnon and R. Davidson, "Improving the reliability of bootstrap
tests with the fast double bootstrap," Queen-s Economics Department
Working Paper No. 1044. Queen-s University, Ontario, Canada, 2006,
unpublished.
[7] B. Efron and R. Tibshirani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap, New York:
Chapman & Hall, 1993, pp. 31-32.
[8] D. Politis, "The impact of bootstrap methods in time series," Statistical
Science, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2003, pp. 219-230.