Abstract: Digital Terrain Model (DTM) is a digital numerical representation of the Earth's surface. DTMs have been applied to a diverse field of tasks, such as urban planning, military, glacier mapping, disaster management. In the expression of the Earth' surface as a mathematical model, an infinite number of point measurements are needed. Because of the impossibility of this case, the points at regular intervals are measured to characterize the Earth's surface and DTM of the Earth is generated. Hitherto, the classical measurement techniques and photogrammetry method have widespread use in the construction of DTM. At present, RADAR, LiDAR, and stereo satellite images are also used for the construction of DTM. In recent years, especially because of its superiorities, Airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) has an increased use in DTM applications. A 3D point cloud is created with LiDAR technology by obtaining numerous point data. However recently, by the development in image mapping methods, the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) for photogrammetric data acquisition has increased DTM generation from image-based point cloud. The accuracy of the DTM depends on various factors such as data collection method, the distribution of elevation points, the point density, properties of the surface and interpolation methods. In this study, the random data reduction method is compared for DTMs generated from image based point cloud data. The original image based point cloud data set (100%) is reduced to a series of subsets by using random algorithm, representing the 75, 50, 25 and 5% of the original image based point cloud data set. Over the ANS campus of Afyon Kocatepe University as the test area, DTM constructed from the original image based point cloud data set is compared with DTMs interpolated from reduced data sets by Kriging interpolation method. The results show that the random data reduction method can be used to reduce the image based point cloud datasets to 50% density level while still maintaining the quality of DTM.
Abstract: The purpose of this article is to find a method
of comparing designs for ordinal regression models using
quantile dispersion graphs in the presence of linear predictor
misspecification. The true relationship between response variable
and the corresponding control variables are usually unknown.
Experimenter assumes certain form of the linear predictor of the
ordinal regression models. The assumed form of the linear predictor
may not be correct always. Thus, the maximum likelihood estimates
(MLE) of the unknown parameters of the model may be biased due to
misspecification of the linear predictor. In this article, the uncertainty
in the linear predictor is represented by an unknown function. An
algorithm is provided to estimate the unknown function at the
design points where observations are available. The unknown function
is estimated at all points in the design region using multivariate
parametric kriging. The comparison of the designs are based on
a scalar valued function of the mean squared error of prediction
(MSEP) matrix, which incorporates both variance and bias of the
prediction caused by the misspecification in the linear predictor. The
designs are compared using quantile dispersion graphs approach.
The graphs also visually depict the robustness of the designs on the
changes in the parameter values. Numerical examples are presented
to illustrate the proposed methodology.
Abstract: We present a general comparison of punctual kriging based image restoration for different neighbourhood sizes. The formulation of the technique under consideration is based on punctual kriging and fuzzy concepts for image restoration in spatial domain. Three different neighbourhood windows are considered to estimate the semivariance at different lags for studying its effect in reduction of negative weights resulted in punctual kriging, consequently restoration of degraded images. Our results show that effect of neighbourhood size higher than 5x5 on reduction in negative weights is insignificant. In addition, image quality measures, such as structure similarity indices, peak signal to noise ratios and the new variogram based quality measures; show that 3x3 window size gives better performance as compared with larger window sizes.