Un Pavillon – Un Monument: The Modern Palace and the Case of the U.S. Embassy in Karachi, Pakistan (1955–59)

This paper investigates civic representation in mid-century diplomatic buildings through the case of the U.S. Embassy in Karachi (1955-59), Pakistan, designed by the Austrian-American architect Richard Neutra (1892-1970) and the American architect Robert Alexander (1907-92). Texts, magazines, and oral histories at that time highlighted the need for a new postwar expression of American governmental architecture, leaning toward modernization, technology, and monumentality. Descriptive, structural, and historical analyses of the U.S. Embassy in Karachi revealed the emergence of a new prototypical solution for postwar diplomatic buildings: the combination of one main orthogonal block, seen as a modern-day corps de logis, and a flanking arcuated pavilion, often organized in one or two stories. Although the U.S. Embassy relied on highly industrialized techniques and abstract images of social progress, archival work at the Neutra’s archives at the University of California, Los Angeles, revealed that much of this project was adapted to vernacular elements and traditional forms—such as the intriguing use of reinforced concrete barrel vaults.

• Marcos Amado Petroli

• Modern monumentality
• post-WWII diplomatic buildings
• theory of character
• thin-shells.

[1] L. A. Craig, The Federal Presence: Architecture, Politics, and National Design. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1984.
[2] J. C. Loeffler, The Architecture of Diplomacy: Building America's Embassies (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1998, p. 4.
[3] E. G. Lui, K. Keita, J. C. Loeffler, and M. Piranio. Building Diplomacy: The Architecture of American Embassies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004.
[4] C. Macy, and S. Bonnemaison. Architecture and Nature: Creating the American Landscape. London: Routledge, 2003.
[5] Courtesy Archive 150.
[6] “A New Public Architecture,” Architectural Forum 110 (January 1959): 84–90.
[7] “Building a Civilized Society,” Architectural Forum 110 (January 1959): 67.
[8] B. Lamprecht, “The Obsolescence of Optimism? Neutra and Alexander’s U.S. Embassy, Karachi, Pakistan,” in Arquitextural, June 2012.
[9] Ralph Rapson and Associates Inc.
[10] E. Corona, Oscar Niemeyer: Uma Lição de Arquitetura. São Paulo: Editora FUPAM, 2001.
[11] Le Corbusier, Une Maison, Un Palais: a la Recherche d'une Unité Architecturale. Paris: G. Crès & Co., 1929.
[12] K. Frampton, Modern Architecture: A Critical History. London: Thames & Hudson, 2007, p.159.
[13] H. Meyer, “Bauen,” (1928), in Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-Century Architecture, ed. U. Conrads, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, p.117.
[14] W. Gropius’s “Sociological Premises of the Minimal Dwelling for Urban Industrial Populations” (1929), in Scope of Total Architecture. New York: Collier Books, 1964.
[15] Le Corbusier’s “In Defense of Architecture” (1929). Translated from the French by N. Bray, A. Lessard, A. Levitt, and G. Baird. From Oppositions Reader: Selected Essays 1973-1984. Princeton Architectural Press. New York, NY: 1998.
[16] C. Rowe. The Mathematics of the Ideal Villa and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, 1976.
[17] S. von Moos, and J. de Heer, Le Corbusier, Elements of a Synthesis. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2009, p.118.
[18] Retrieved from an email sent by the Brazilian architectural historian Carlos Eduardo Comas to the author on May 21, 2017.
[19] C. T. Goodsell, The Social Meaning of Civic Space. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1988.
[20] Moderne Denkmalkultus: Sein Wesen Und Seine Entstehung, 1903.
[21] F. Choay, The Invention of the Historic Monument. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[22] A. D’Hooghe, The Liberal Monument: Urban Design and the Late Modern Project. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2010, p.72.
[23] L. Mumford, “The Death of the Monument,” in Circle: International Survey of Constructive Art, ed. B. Nicholson, N. Gabo, and L. Martin. London: Faber and Faber, 1937.
[24] S. Giedion, F. Léger, and J.L. Sert, “Nine Points on Monumentality” (1943), in Architecture Culture 1943-1968, ed. J. Ockman & E. Eigen. New York: Rizzoli, 1993, pp. 29–30.
[25] S. Giedion, “The Need for a New Monumentality,” in P. Zucker (ed.). New Architecture and City Planning. New York: Philosophical Library, 1944.
[26] L. Costa, speaker at “In Search of a New Monumentality: A Symposium,” Architectural Review 104, G. Paulsson, ed., pp. 117–28, Sep. 1948.
[27] E. B. Mock, ed., Built in USA: 1932-1944. New York: The Museum of Modern Art, 1944.
[28] M. A. Ali Khan, “Pakistan-U.S. Ties Broaden,” Christian Science Monitor, May 19, 1961.
[29] Courtesy Richard and Dion Neutra Papers, 1925–1970, Collection 1179, Charles E. Young Research Library, UCLA.
[30] U.S. Embassy in Karachi Descriptive Memorial, caption list and report submitted to the U.S. State Department, written and provided by Neutra and Alexander, undated (c.1958). Source: Richard and Dion Papers, Collection 1179, Charles E. Young Research Library, UCLA.
[31] C. E. Comas. “A máquina para Recordar: Ministério da Educação no Rio de Janeiro, 1936/45,” in Arquitextos/Vitruvius (October, 2000), available online: https://www.vitruvius.com.br/revistas/read/arquitextos/01.005/967.