Sustaining the Social Memory in a Historic Neighborhood: The Case Study of Uch Dukkan Neighborhood in Ardabil City in Azerbaijani Region of Iran

Conservation of historical urban patterns in the traditional neighborhoods is a part of creating integrated urban environments that are socially more sustainable. Urbanization reflects on life conditions and social, physical, economical characteristics of the society. In this regard, historical zones and traditional regions are affected by dramatic interventions on these characteristics. This article focuses on the Uch Dukkan neighborhood located in Ardabil City in Azarbaijani region of Iran, which has been up to such interventions that leaded its transformation from the past to the present. After introducing a brief inventory of the main elements of the historical zone and the neighborhood; this study explores the changes and transformations in different periods; and their impacts on the quality of the environment and its social sustainability. The survey conducted in the neighborhood as part of this research study revealed that the Uch Dukkan neighborhood and the unique architectural heritage that it possesses have become more inactive physically and functionally in a decade. This condition requires an exploration and comparison of the present and the expected transformations of the meaning of social space from the most private unit to the urban scale. From this token, it is argued that an architectural point of view that is based on space order; use and meaning of space as a social and cultural image, should not be ignored. Based on the interplay between social sustainability, collective memory, and the urban environment, study aims to make the invisible portion of ignorance clear, that ends up with a weakness in defining the collective meaning of the neighborhood as a historic urban district. It reveals that the spatial possessions of the neighborhood are valuable not only for their historical and physical characteristics, but also for their social memory that is to be remembered and constructed further.

• Yousef Daneshvar Rouyandozagh
• Ece. K. Açikgöz

• Urban integrity
• social sustainability
• collective memory
• social decay.

[1] Colantonio, A. (2009). Social sustainability: linking research to policy and practice, 3(1), 5-6.
[2] Norgaard, R. B. (1994). Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and a Coevolutionary Revisioning of the Future, 2.
[3] Pourjafar, M., R. Pourmand, H. A., Zabihi, H., Hashemidemneh, L. S., and Taban, M. (2010). Padidar shenasie hoviat va makan dar bafthaye tarikhi. (Place and identity in historical patterns). Faslnameye Motaleate Shahrhaye Irani Eslami, 3(2), 11-20.
[4] Sachs, I. (1999). Social sustainability and whole development: exploring the dimensions of sustainable development. Sustainability and the Social Sciences: A cross-disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical reorientation, 25-36.
[5] Shaffer, B. (2000). The formation of Azerbaijani collective identity in Iran. Nattonalities Papers, 28(3), 449-477.
[6] Singh, N., & Gilman, J. (1999). Making livelihoods more sustainable. International Social Science Journal, 51(162), 539-545.
[7] Hempel, L. C. (1999). Conceptual and analytical challenges in building sustainable communities. Toward sustainable communities: Transition and transformations in environmental policy, 43-74.
[8] Bramall, R. (2008). Book Review: Theories of Memory: A Reader: Michael Rossington and Anne Whitehead (eds) Edinburgh University Press, 2007, 310 pp. f19. 99. ISBN 0748625038. Memory Studies, 1(3), 341-343.
[9] Basa, İ. (2015). Kentsel Hafızanın Sürdürülebilirliği: Bir Mimarlık Stüdyosu Deneyimi. Sanat ve Tasarım, 1(15), 27-42.
[10] Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, U.K. The MIT Press.
[11] Kahn, M. (1995, March). Concepts, definitions, and key issues in sustainable development: the outlook for the future. In Proceedings of the International Sustainable Development Research Conference, Manchester Conference Centre UK, 27-29.
[12] Morley, D., & Robins, K. (1997). Kimlik mekânları. (Çeviren: Zeybekoğlu). Orijinal Baskı.
[13] Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities. Oxford: Blackwell, 63(2), 77-120.
[14] Castells, M. (1977). The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. London, Edward Arnold,Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 444-446.
[15] Şengül, H. T. (2003). Yerel Yönetimler Yasa Tasarısı Üzerine. Bağımsız Sosyal.
[16] Kaypak, Ş. (2011). Küreselleşme sürecinde sürdürülebilir bir kalkınma için sürdürülebilir bir çevre.
[17] Özcan, K. (2009). Sürdürülebilir kentsel korumanın olabilirliği üzerine bir yaklaşım önerisi: Konya tarihi kent merkezi örneği. Metu Jfa, 26(2), 1-18.
[18] Safari, B. (1991). Ardabil on passage of History, 22(2), 220-225.