Structural Analysis of an Active Morphing Wing for Enhancing UAV Performance

A numerical study of a design concept for actively controlling wing twist is described in this paper. The concept consists of morphing elements which were designed to provide a rigid and seamless skin while maintaining structural rigidity. The wing structure is first modeled in CATIA V5 then imported into ANSYS for structural analysis. Athena Vortex Lattice method (AVL) is used to estimate aerodynamic response as well as aerodynamic loads of morphing wings, afterwards a structural optimization performed via ANSYS Static. Overall, the results presented in this paper show that the concept provides efficient wing twist while preserving an aerodynamically smooth and compliant surface. Sufficient structural rigidity in bending is also obtained. This concept is suggested as a possible alternative for morphing skin applications. 

Authors:



References:
[1] Culick, F. (2003). The Wright Brothers: First Aeronautical Engineers and Test Pilots. AIAA Journal, 41(6), 985– 1006.
[2] McRuer, D. & Graham, D. (2004). Flight control century: triumphs of the systems approach. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 27(2), 161–173.
[3] Jha K. & Kudva J. N. (2004). Morphing aircraft concepts, classifications, and challenges. Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies, 5388, 213– 224.
[4] Barbarino, S. et al. (2011). A Review of Morphing Aircraft, Journal Intelligent Materials, Systems and Structures, 22(9), 823–877.
[5] Kaygan, E., Gatto, A. (2014), 'Investigation of Adaptable Winglets for Improved UAV Control and Performance', International Science Index 91, International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial and Mechatronics Engineering, 8(7), 1289 - 1294.
[6] Kaygan, E. Gatto, A. (2015), 'Computational Analysis of Adaptable Winglets for Improved Morphing Aircraft Performance', International Science Index 103, International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering, 9(7), 1069-1075.
[7] Kaygan, E., Gatto, A. (2016), ‘Development of an Active Morphing Wing with Novel Adaptive Skin for Aircraft Control and Performance, The Greener Aviation 2016, Brussels, Belgium.
[8] G. Murray, F. Gandhi, and C. Bakis, “Flexible Matrix Composite Skins for One-dimensional Wing Morphing,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 21, no. 17, pp. 1771–1781, 2010.
[9] K. R. Olympio, F. Gandhi, L. Asheghian, and J. Kudva, “Design of a Flexible Skin for a Shear Morphing Wing,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 21, no. 17, pp. 1755–1770, 2010.
[10] E. a. Bubert, B. K. S. Woods, K. Lee, C. S. Kothera, and N. M. Wereley, “Design and Fabrication of a Passive 1D Morphing Aircraft Skin,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 21, no. 17, pp. 1699–1717, 2010.
[11] I. Dayyani, S. Ziaei-Rad, and M. I. Friswell, “The mechanical behavior of composite corrugated core coated with elastomer for morphing skins,” J. Compos. Mater., vol. 48, no. 13, pp. 1623–1636, 2013.
[12] A. D. Shaw, I. Dayyani, and M. I. Friswell, “Optimisation of composite corrugated skins for buckling in morphing aircraft,” Compos. Struct., vol. 119, pp. 227–237, Jan. 2015.
[13] Saffman, P. (1992). Vortex Dynamics, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 46–48.
[14] Barlow, J. B., Rae, W. H., Jr., and Pope, A., Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing, 3rd ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1999.