Applicability of Overhangs for Energy Saving in Existing High-Rise Housing in Different Climates

Upgrading the thermal performance of building
envelope of existing residential buildings is an effective way to reduce
heat gain or heat loss. Overhang device is a common solution for
building envelope improvement as it can cut down solar heat gain and
thereby can reduce the energy used for space cooling in summer time.
Despite that, overhang can increase the demand for indoor heating in
winter due to its function of lowering the solar heat gain. Obviously,
overhang has different impacts on energy use in different climatic
zones which have different energy demand. To evaluate the impact of
overhang device on building energy performance under different
climates of China, an energy analysis model is built up in a
computer-based simulation program known as DesignBuilder based
on the data of a typical high-rise residential building. The energy
simulation results show that single overhang is able to cut down
around 5% of the energy consumption of the case building in the
stand-alone situation or about 2% when the building is surrounded by
other buildings in regions which predominantly rely on space cooling
though it has no contribution to energy reduction in cold region. In
regions with cold summer and cold winter, adding overhang over
windows can cut down around 4% and 1.8% energy use with and
without adjoining buildings, respectively. The results indicate that
overhang might not an effective shading device to reduce the energy
consumption in the mixed climate or cold regions.




References:
[1] Pérez-Lombard, L., J. Ortiz, and C. Pout, “A review on buildings energy
consumption information”. Energy and Buildings, vol. 40, no. 3, pp.
394-398, 2008.
[2] Kneifel, J., “Life-cycle carbon and cost analysis of energy efficiency
measures in new commercial buildings”. Energy and Buildings, vol. 42,
no. 3, pp. 333-340, 2010.
[3] Huang, Y., J.-l. Niu, and T.-m. Chung, “Energy and carbon emission
payback analysis for energy-efficient retrofitting in buildings—Overhang
shading option”. Energy and Buildings, vol. 44, no., pp. 94-103, 2012.
[4] Ossen, D.R., M.H. Ahmad, and N.H. Madros, “Optimum Overhang
Geometry for Building Energy Saving in Tropical Climates”. Asian
Architecture and Building Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 563-570, 2005.
[5] Offiong, A. and A.U. Ukpoho, “An analysis of solar gain through
externally shaded window of buildings”. Renewable energy, vol. 29, no.
1, pp. 131-150, 2004.
[6] Offiong, A. and A.U. Ukpoho, “External window shading treatment
effects on internal environmental temperature of buildings”. Renewable
Energy, vol. 29, no. 14, pp. 2153-2165, 2004.
[7] Bojić, M., “Application of overhangs and side fins to high-rise residential
buildings in Hong Kong”. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems,
vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 271-285, 2006.
[8] Huang, Y., J.-l. Niu, and T.-m. Chung, “Comprehensive analysis on
thermal and daylighting performance of glazing and shading designs on
office building envelope in cooling-dominant climates”. Applied Energy,
vol. 134, no., pp. 215-228, 2014.
[9] Ebrahimpour, A. and M. Maerefat, “Application of advanced glazing and
overhangs in residential buildings”. Energy Conversion and
Management, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 212-219, 2011.
[10] Raeissi, S. and M. Taheri, “Optimum overhang dimensions for energy
saving”. Building and Environment, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 293-302, 1998.
[11] Aldawoud, A., “Conventional fixed shading devices in comparison to an
electrochromic glazing system in hot, dry climate”. Energy and
Buildings, vol. 59, no., pp. 104-110, 2013.
[12] Kim, G., H.S. Lim, T.S. Lim, L. Schaefer, and J.T. Kim, “Comparative
advantage of an exterior shading device in thermal performance for
residential buildings”. Energy and Buildings, vol. 46, no., pp. 105-111,
2012.
[13] Jeong Tai, K. and G. Kim, “Advanced External Shading Device to
Maximize Visual and View Performance”. Indoor and Built Environment,
vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 65-72, 2010.
[14] Kapur, N.K., “A comparative analysis of the radiant effect of external
sunshades on glass surface temperatures”. Solar Energy, vol. 77, no. 4,
pp. 407-419, 2004.
[15] Lee, E.S. and A. Tavil, “Energy and visual comfort performance of
electrochromic windows with overhangs”. Building and Environment,
vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 2439-2449, 2007.
[16] Bellia, L., F. De Falco, and F. Minichiello, “Effects of solar shading
devices on energy requirements of standalone office buildings for Italian
climates”. Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 190-201,
2013.
[17] Kamal, M.A., “A study on shading of buildings as a preventive measure
for passive cooling and energy conservation in buildings”. International
Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 19-22,
2010.
[18] Brownlee, A. EI, J.A. Wright, and M.M. Mourshed. “A Multi-Objective
Window Optimisation Problem”, in the 13th annual conference
companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation, Dublin, 2011, pp.
89-90.
[19] Weytjens, L., S. Attia, G. Verbeeck, and A.D. Herde, “A comparative
study of the architect-friendliness of six building performance simulation
tools”. Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development vol. 2,
no. 3, pp. 237-244, 2012.
[20] Attia, S., L. Beltrán, A.D. Herde, and J. Hensen, ‘Architect friendly’: a
comparison of ten different building performance simulation tools, in
Eleventh International IBPSA Conference. 2009: Glasgow, Scotland. p.
204-211.
[21] Attia, S.G.M. and A. De Herde, Early design simulation tools for net zero
energy buildings: a comparison of ten tools, in IBPSA. 2011,
Designbuilder: Sydney, Australia.
[22] Tronchin, L. and K. Fabbri, “Energy performance building evaluation in
Mediterranean countries: Comparison between software simulations and
operating rating simulation”. Energy and Buildings, vol. 40, no. 7, pp.
1176-1187, 2008.
[23] Wasilowski, H. and C. Reinhart. “Modelling an existing building in
DesignBuilder-custom versus default inputs”, in Building Simulation
2009 Glasgow, 2009
[24] Virote, J. and R. Neves-Silva, “Stochastic models for building energy
prediction based on occupant behavior assessment”. Energy and
Buildings, vol. 53, no., pp. 183-193, 2012.
[25] Wang, S., C. Yan, and F. Xiao, “Quantitative energy performance
assessment methods for existing buildings”. Energy and Buildings, vol.
55, no., pp. 873-888, 2012.
[26] Radhi, H., “On the optimal selection of wall cladding system to reduce
direct and indirect CO2 emissions”. Energy, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1412-1424,
2010.
[27] Standard of Climatic Regionalization for Architecture, in GB50178-93.
1994, Ministry of Construction of the People’s Republic of China: China.
[28] Chen, L., et al., “Sky view factor analysis of street canyons and its
implications for daytime intra-urban air temperature differentials in
high-rise, high-density urban areas of Hong Kong: a GIS-based
simulation approach”. International Journal of Climatology, vol. 32, no.
1, pp. 121-136, 2012.
[29] Ng, E., L. Chen, Y. Wang, and C. Yuan, “A study on the cooling effects of
greening in a high-density city: An experience from Hong Kong”.
Building and Environment, vol. 47, no., pp. 256-271, 2012.
[30] Ng, E., “Policies and technical guidelines for urban planning of
high-density cities – air ventilation assessment (AVA) of Hong Kong”.
Building and Environment, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1478-1488, 2009.
[31] LAM, J.C., “An analysis of residential sector energy use in Hong Kong”.
Energy and Buildings, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 1995.
[32] EMSD, Hong Kong Energy End-use Data 2014, E.a.M.S. Department,
Editor. 2014, The Government of The Hong Kong Special Administrative
Region: Hong Kong. p. 1-74.
[33] Yang, F., S.S.Y. Lau, and F. Qian, “Summertime heat island intensities in
three high-rise housing quarters in inner-city Shanghai China: Building
layout, density and greenery”. Building and Environment, vol. 45, no. 1,
pp. 115-134, 2010.
[34] Tang, Y.-Q., Z.-D. Cui, J.-X. Wang, C. Lu, and X.-X. Yan, “Model test
study of land subsidence caused by high-rise building group in Shanghai”.
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, vol. 67, no. 2, pp.
173-179, 2008.
[35] High-rise Buildings of Beijing, in EMPORIS. 2016.
[36] Hui, X., Housing, urban renewal and socio-spatial integration: a study
on rehabilitating the former socialistic public housing areas in Beijing.
2013, TU Delft.
[37] Yang, J., J. McBride, J. Zhou, and Z. Sun, “The urban forest in Beijing
and its role in air pollution reduction”. Urban Forestry & Urban
Greening, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 65-78, 2005.
[38] Li, F., R. Wang, J. Paulussen, and X. Liu, “Comprehensive concept
planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: a case study in
Beijing, China”. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 72, no. 4, pp.
325-336, 2005.
[39] Yang, L., J.C. Lam, and C.L. Tsang, “Energy performance of building
envelopes in different climate zones in China”. Applied Energy, vol. 85,
no. 9, pp. 800-817, 2008.
[40] Yu, J., C. Yang, and L. Tian, “Low-energy envelope design of residential
building in hot summer and cold winter zone in China”. Energy and
Buildings, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1536-1546, 2008.
[41] K.S.Y. Wan and F.H.W. Yik, “Representative building design and
internal load patterns for modelling energy use in residential buildings in
Hong Kong”. Applied Energy, vol. 77, no. 2014, pp. 69-85, 2004.
[42] M. Bojic, F. Yik, and P. Sat, “Influence of thermal insulation position in
building envelope on the space cooling of highrise residential buildings in
Hong Kong”. Energy and Buildings, vol. 33, no. 2001, pp. 569-581, 2001.
[43] M. Bojic, F. Yik, and P. Sat, “Influence of envelope and partition
characteristics on the space cooling of high-rise residential buildings in
Hong Kong”. Building and Environment, vol. 37, no. 2002, pp. 347-355,
2002.
[44] Cheung, C.K., R.J. Fuller, and M.B. Luther, “Energy-efficient envelope
design for high-rise apartments”. Energy and Buildings, vol. 37, no. 1, pp.
37-48, 2005.
[45] Chan, A.L.S. and T.T. Chow, “Evaluation of Overall Thermal Transfer
Value (OTTV) for commercial buildings constructed with green roof”.
Applied Energy, vol. 107, no., pp. 10-24, 2013.
[46] Ali-Toudert, F. and H. Mayer, “Numerical study on the effects of aspect
ratio and orientation of an urban street canyon on outdoor thermal comfort
in hot and dry climate”. Building and Environment, vol. 41, no. 2, pp.
94-108, 2006.