A Tool for Rational Assessment of Dynamic Trust in Networked Organizations

Networked environments which provide platforms for business organizations are configured in different forms depending on many factors including life time, member characteristics, communication structure, and business objectives, among others. With continuing advances in digital technologies the distance has become a less barrier for business minded collaboration among organizations. With the need and ease to make business collaborate nowadays organizations are sometimes forced to co-work with others that are either unknown or less known to them in terms of history and performance. A promising approach for sustaining established collaboration has been establishment of trust relationship among organizations based on assessed trustworthiness for each participating organization. It has been stated in research that trust in organization is dynamic and thus assessment of trust level must address such dynamic nature. This paper assesses relevant aspects of trust and applies the assessed concepts to propose a semi-automated system for the management of Sustainability and Evolution of trust in organizations participating in specific objective in a networked organizations environment.




References:
[1] Camarinha-Matos, L. M. & Afsarmanesh, H. Collaborative networks: a
new scientific discipline. International Journal Intelligent
Manufacturing, 16, 2005, pp. 439–452.
[2] Daudi, M., Msanjila, S. S. Modeling of Evolution and Sustainability of
Rational Trust in Dynamic VOs. In Camarinha-Matos, L. M., Scherer,R.
J. (Ed) PRO-VE 2013, IFIP AICT, 408, 2013, pp. 548-555, Springer,
Heidelberg.
[3] Msanjila, S. S. & Afsarmanesh, H. On development of TrustMan system
assisting configuration of temporary consortiums. International Journal
of Production Research. 47(17), 2009, pp. 4757 -4790.
[4] Msanjila, S. S. Engineering the Evolution of Organizational Trust in
Operating Virtual Organization. International Journal of the Academy of
Organizational Behavior Management (IJAOBM), 1, ISSN: 1927-565X,
2012, pp. 120-138.
[5] Nami, M. R. & Malekpour, A. Toward Autonomous Virtual
Organizations”. International Journal of Hybrid Information
Technology. 2(1), 2009, pp. 57-64.
[6] Wehmeyer, K. & Riemer, K. Trust-building potential of coordination
Roles in virtual organizations. In The Electronic Journal for Virtual
Organizations and Networks, vol. 8, 2007.
[7] Afsarmanesh, H., Camarinha-Matos, L. & Msanjila, S.S. Virtual
organizations breeding environments: key results from ECOLEAD. In
the proceedings of International conference on Cost Effective
Automation in Networked Product Development and Manufacturing –
IFAC-CEA’2007. Monterey, Mexico, 2007.
[8] Msanjila, S. S. & Afsarmanesh, H. Trust Analysis and Assessment in
Virtual Organizations Breeding Environments. International Journal of
Production Research, ISSN (print) 0020-7543, 2007, pp. 1253-1295.
[9] S. S. Msanjila. On inter-organizational trust engineering in networked
collaboration: modeling and management of rational trust. IPS drunkkers
publishers, ISBN 9789057761966, Amsterdam, 2009.
[10] Castelfranchi, C. & Falcone, R. Trust Is Much More than Subjective
Probability: Mental Components and Sources of Trust. In proceedings of
the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii,
2000.
[11] Msanjila, S. S., Afsarmanesh, H. FETR. A Framework to Establish Trust
Relationships among Organizations in VBEs. In the International
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing; Special issue: Trust, Value
Systems and Governance in Collaborative Networks. ISSN 0956-5515,
Springer, 2008.
[12] Kirkwood, C. W. System Dynamics Method. Ventana System Inc. 1998.
[13] Msanjila, S.S. & Afsarmanesh, H. Specification of the TrustMan system
for assisting management of VBEs. Lecture notes of computer science
series, LNCS 4657, Springer, 2007b pp. 34-43.
[14] Msanjila, S. S. & Afsarmanesh, H. HICI: An approach for identifying
trust elements – The case of technological perspective in VBEs. In
proceeding of International conference on availability, reliability and
security., 2007a, pp. 757-764, Vienna.