A Case Study of the Digital Translation of the Lucy Lloyd and Wilhelm Bleek |Xam and !Kun Notebooks into The Digital Bleek and Lloyd

This paper will examine the digitization process of the |Xam and !Kun notebooks, authored by Lucy Lloyd, Dorothea Bleek and Wilhelm Bleek, and their collaborators |a!kunta, ||kabbo, ≠kasin, Dia!kwain, !kweiten ta ||ken, |han≠kass'o, !nanni, Tamme, |uma, and Da during the 19th century. Detail will be provided about the status of the archive, the creation of the digital archive and selected research projects linked to the archive. The Digital Bleek and Lloyd project is an example of institutional collaboration by the University of Cape Town, University of South Africa, Iziko South African Museum, the National Library of South Africa and the Western Cape Provincial Archives and Records Service. The contemporary value of the archive will be discussed in relation to its current manifestation as a collection of archival and digital objects, each with its own set of properties and archival risk factors. This tension between the two ways to access the archive will be interrogated to shed light on the slippages between the digital object and the archival object. The primary argument is that the process of digitization generates an ontological shift in the status of the archival object. The secondary argument is an engagement with practices to curate the encounters with these ontologically shifted objects and how to relate to each as a contemporary viewer. In conclusion this paper will argue for regarding these archival objects according to the interpretive framework utilized to engage secular relics.

Authors:

• F. Saptouw

Keywords:

• Archive
• curatorship
• digitization
• The Digital Bleek and Lloyd.

References:

[1] Bearman, D. 2002. Electronic Record-Keeping, Social Memory and Democracy. In Refiguring the Archive. C. Hamilton, V. Harris, J. Taylor, M. Pickover, G. Reici & R. Saleh (eds.). Cape Town, South Africa: David Philip; Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[2] Bodenstein, F. 2011. The Emotional Museum. Thoughts on the “Secular Relics” of Nineteenth-Century History Museums in Paris and their Posterity. Conserveries mémorielles (En ligne), #9 | (Online). Available: http://journals.openedition.org/cm/834. (2020-02-14).
[3] Bodleian Libraries. 2018. Introduction to Digital Preservation: Risks to digital assets. (Online). Available: https://libguides.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/digitalpreservation. (2020-03-03).
[4] Deacon, J. & P. Skotnes (eds). 2014. The courage of //kabbo: celebrating the 100th anniversary of the publication of Specimens of Bushman folklore. Cape Town: UCT Press.
[5] Garaba, F. 2015. The Timbuktu manuscripts: a model for preservation in Africa. Paper presented at the IFLA World Library and Information Congress 81st IFLA General Conference and Assembly, 15-21 August 2015, Cape Town, South Africa.
[6] Jacquette, D. 2002. Ontology. Acumen Publishing. United Kingdom
[7] Kenney, A.R. 2000. Technology: Mainstreaming Digitization into the Mission of Cultural Repositories. (Online). Available: https://clir.wordpress.clir.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/pub88.pdf/ (2020-02-03).
[8] Nollan, M. 2013. “Medieval Habit, Modern Sensation: Reading Manuscripts in the Digital Age. in The Chaucer Review. 47(4): 465–476
[9] Phiri, L. and H. Suleman, (2012) In Search of Simplicity: Redesigning the Digital Bleek and Lloyd. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 32(4):306-312. (Online). Available: http://pubs.cs.uct.ac.za/archive/00000780/ (2020-02-03).
[10] Skotnes, P. 2005. The Digital Bleek and Lloyd. Llarec, University of Cape Town. (Online). Available http://lloydbleekcollection.cs.uct.ac.za/. 14000 image and text pages. (2020-03-05).
[11] Skotnes, P., Bleek, W. H. I. & L. Lloyd, 2007. Claim to the country: the archive of Lucy Lloyd and Wilhelm Bleek. Johannesburg: Jacana; Athens: Ohio University Press.
[12] Puglia, S. & J. Reed, E. Rhodes. 2004. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) - Technical Guidelines for Digitizing Archival Materials for Electronic Access: Creation of Production Master Files – Raster Images. (Online). Available: https://www.archives.gov/files/preservation/technical/guidelines.pdf. (2020-03-05).
[13] Schramm, K. 2011. Landscapes of Violence: Memory and Sacred Space. History & Memory. 23(1): 5-22.
[14] Szpiech, R. 2014 “Cracking the Code: Reflections on Manuscripts in the Age of Digital Books.” in Digital Philology: A Journal of Medieval Cultures. 3(1):75–100.
[15] Taylor, J. 2002. Holding: Refiguring the Archive. In Refiguring the Archive. C. Hamilton, V. Harris, J. Taylor, M. Pickover, G. Reici & R. Saleh (eds.). Cape Town, South Africa: David Philip; Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 243-282.
[16] Van Lit, L.W.C. 2020. Among Digitized Manuscripts: Philology, Codicology, Paleography in a Digital World. Brill: Boston.