A Surrealist Play of Associations: Neoliberalism, Critical Pedagogy and Surrealism in Secondary English Language Arts

This project utilizes principles derived from the Surrealist movement to prioritize creative and critical thinking in secondary English Language Arts (ELA). The implementation of Surrealist-style pedagogies within an ELA classroom will be rooted in critical, radical pedagogy, which addresses the injustices caused by economic-oriented educational systems. The use of critical pedagogy will enable the subversive artistic and political aims of Surrealism to be transmitted to a classroom context. Through aesthetic reading strategies, appreciative questioning and dialogue, students will actively critique the power dynamics which structure (and often restrict) their lives. Within the ELA domain, cost-effective approaches often replace the actual “arts” of ELA. This research will therefore explore how Surrealist-oriented pedagogies could restore imaginative freedom and deconstruct conceptual barriers (normative standards, curricular constraints, and status quo power relations) in secondary ELA. This research will also examine how Surrealism can be used as a political and pedagogical model to treat societal problems mirrored in ELA classrooms. The stakeholders are teachers, as they experience constant pressure within their practices. Similarly, students encounter rigorous, results-based pressures. These dynamics contribute to feelings of powerlessness, thus reinforcing a formulaic model of ELA. The ELA curriculum has potential to create laboratories for critical discussion and active movement towards social change. This proposed research strategy of Surrealist-oriented pedagogies could enable students to experiment with social issues and develop senses of agency and voice that reflect awareness of contemporary society while simultaneously building their ELA skills.

• Stephanie Ho

• Arts-informed pedagogies
• language arts
• literature
• Surrealism.

[1] Berger, John. (2008). Ways of seeing (Vols. 1–1 online resource (165 pages).). Retrieved from https://www.overdrive.com/search?q=356819C6-C74D-4B2F-BB7E-7C79A6F2BB2F
[2] Breton, A., Seaver, R., & Lane, H. R. (1972). Manifestoes of surrealism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
[3] Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259.
[4] Foucault, M., Burchell, Graham., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality : With two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. Retrieved from http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0608/91010456-t.html
[5] Freire, P., Ramos, M. B., Macedo, D. P., & Shor, I. (2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed (50th anniversary edition.). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
[6] Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Granby, Mass.: Bergin & Garvey.
[7] Giroux, H. A. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 425–463.
[8] Giroux, H. A. (2016). When schools become dead zones of the imagination: A critical pedagogy manifesto. High School Journal, 99(4), 351–359.
[9] Gramsci, A., Bellamy, R., & Cox, Virginia. (1994). Antonio Gramsci: Pre-prison writings. Retrieved from http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/cam022/92047069.html
[10] Greene, M. (2011). Releasing the imagination. NJ (Drama Australia Journal), 34(2011).
[11] Hall, J. K., & Eggington, W. (2000). The Sociopolitics of English Language Teaching. Retrieved April 15, 2019, from http://web.a.ebscohost.com.proxy3.library.mcgill.ca/ehost/ebookviewer/ebook/bmxlYmtfXzIzMzg3X19BTg2?sid=3ca54cea-d570-4fef-8a53-1d7a7cfb471d@sessionmgr4007&vid=0&format=EB&rid=1
[12] Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism (Vols. 1–1 online resource (vii, 247 pages) : illustrations, maps). Retrieved from http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191536182
[13] MEES. (2019). Quebec Education Program: Secondary School Education, Cycle Two.
[14] Orwell, G., Martínez Sarmiento, M. A., & Molina Cardona, M. (2013). 1984 (Vols. 1–1 online resource). Retrieved from https://www.overdrive.com/search?q=7164EEDE-97B1-4975-9A95-A874A393C829
[15] Parker, T. (2015). Tasting French terroir: The history of an idea (Vols. 1–1 online resource: illustrations.). Retrieved from http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=1882089
[16] Rose, Karel., & Kincheloe, J. L. (2003). Art, culture, & education: Artful teaching in a fractured landscape. New York: Peter Lang.
[17] Rosenblatt, L. M. (2005). Literature—S.O.S.! Voices from the Middle, 12(3), 34–38.
[18] Rubin, W. (1968). Dada, surrealism, and their heritage. Retrieved from http://llrc.mcast.edu.mt/digitalversion/Table_of_Contents_7961.pdf
[19] Swanger, David. (1990). Essays in aesthetic education. San Francisco: EM Text ;
[20] Trend, David. (1992). Cultural pedagogy: Art, education, politics. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
[21] Wilkin, K. (1998). Art: “Refus global” at 50. The New Criterion, 17(2), 50.