Abstract: In this paper, analysis of an infinite beam resting on
multilayer tensionless extensible geosynthetic reinforced granular
fill-poor soil system overlying soft soil strata under moving load with
constant velocity is presented. The beam is subjected to a
concentrated load moving with constant velocity. The upper
reinforced granular bed is modeled by a rough membrane embedded
in Pasternak shear layer overlying a series of compressible nonlinear
winkler springs representing the underlying the very poor soil. The
multilayer tensionless extensible geosynthetic layer has been
assumed to deform such that at interface the geosynthetic and the soil
have some deformation. Nonlinear behaviour of granular fill and the
very poor soil has been considered in the analysis by means of
hyperbolic constitutive relationships. Governing differential
equations of the soil foundation system have been obtained and
solved with the help of appropriate boundary conditions. The solution
has been obtained by employing finite difference method by means of
Gauss-Siedal iterative scheme. Detailed parametric study has been
conducted to study the influence of various parameters on the
response of soil–foundation system under consideration by means of
deflection and bending moment in the beam and tension mobilized in
the geosynthetic layer. These parameters include magnitude of
applied load, velocity of load, damping, ultimate resistance of poor
soil and granular fill layer. Range of values of parameters has been
considered as per Indian Railway conditions. This study clearly
observed that the comparisons of multilayer tensionless extensible
geosynthetic reinforcement with poor foundation soil and magnitude
of applied load, relative compressibility of granular fill and ultimate
resistance of poor soil has significant influence on the response of
soil–foundation system.
Abstract: In this paper analysis of an infinite beam resting on tensionless extensible geosynthetic reinforced granular bed overlying soft soil strata under moving load with constant velocity is presented. The beam is subjected to a concentrated load moving with constant velocity. The upper reinforced granular bed is modeled by a rough elastic membrane embedded in Pasternak shear layer overlying a series of compressible nonlinear Winkler springs representing the under-lied very poor soil. The tensionless extensible geosynthetic layer has been assumed to deform such that at interface the geosynthetic and the soil have some deformation. Nonlinear behavior of granular fill and the very poor soil has been considered in the analysis by means of hyperbolic constitutive relationships. Detailed parametric study has been conducted to study the influence of various parameters on the response of soil foundation system under consideration by means of deflection and bending moment in the beam and tension mobilized in the geosynthetic layer. This study clearly observed that the comparisons of tension and tensionless foundation and magnitude of applied load, relative compressibility of granular fill and ultimate resistance of poor soil has significant influence on the response of soil foundation system.
Abstract: This paper tries to study the effect of geosynthetic inclusion on the improvement of the load-settlement characters of two layered soil. In addition, the effect of geogrid and geotextile in reduction of the required thickness of subbase layer in unpaved roads is studied. Considering the vast application of bearing ratio tests in road construction projects, this test is used in present investigation. Bearing ratio tests were performed on two layered soil including a granular soil layer at the top (as the subbase layer) and a weak clayey soil placed at the bottom (as the subgrade layer). These tests were performed for different conditions including unreinforced and reinforced by geogrid and geotextile and three thicknesses for top layer soil (subbase layer). In the reinforced condition the reinforcing element was placed on the interface of the top granular layer and the beneath clayey layer to study the separation effect of geosynthetics. In all tests the soils (both granular and clayey soil layers) were compacted according to optimum water content. At the end, the diagrams were plotted and were compared with each other. Furthermore, a comparison between geogrids and geotextiles behaviors on two layer soil is done in this paper. The results show an increase in compression strength of reinforced specimen in comparison with unreinforced soil sample. The effect of geosynthetic inclusion reduces by increasing the subbase thickness. In addition it was found that geogrids have more desirable behavior rather than geotextiles due to interlocking with the subbase layer aggregates.