The Challenges of Hyper-Textual Learning Approach for Religious Education

State of the art technology has the tremendous impact on our life, in this situation education system have been influenced as well as. In this paper, tried to compare two space of learning text and hypertext with each other, and some challenges of using hypertext in religious education. Regarding the fact that, hypertext is an undeniable part of learning in this world and it has highly beneficial for the education process from class to office and home. In this paper tried to solve this question: the consequences and challenges of applying hypertext in religious education. Also, the consequences of this survey demonstrate the role of curriculum designer and planner of education to solve this problem.





References:
[1] Landow, G, and Delany, P. (1991). Hypertext, Hypermedia and Literacy Studies: The State of Art. MIT Press. Cambridge.
[2] Wills, D. (1999) . the Nature of Hypertext: Background and Implication for Librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship.Vol. 25.No.2.
[3] Barthes, R. (1977). From Work to Text’.Image, Music, Text.Trans.S.Heath, Hill and Wang.New York.
[4] McKnight, C, Dillion, A, and Richardson, J. (1996) . User Centered Design of Hypertext and Hypermedia for Education. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Macmillan. New York.
[5] Berg, S and Watt, J.H. (1001) Effects of Educational Setting on Student Response to Structured Hypertext.Journal of Computer-Badsed Instruction.New York.
[6] Nielsen, J. (1990) .Hypertext and Hypermedia. Academic Press. Copenhagen .Denmark.
[7] Landow, G. (1992). Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. John Hopkins University Press. Boltimore.
[8] Popkewitz, T. (1991). A Political Sociology of Educational Reform. Teacher College Press. New York.
[9] Poster, M. (1995) . the Second Media Age. Polity Press. Oxford.
[10] Moulthrop, S. (1994) .Rhizome and Resistance: Hypertext and the Dream of a New Culture, in Hyper/Text/Theory. John Hopkins Press. Baltimore.
[11] Staninger, S.W. (1994). Hypertext Technology: Educational Consequences”.Journal of Educational Technology .Vol.July/Aug.
[12] Birkerts, S. (1994) . The Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in the electronic Age.New York.
[13] Foucault.M. (1977). What Is an Author”.Language, counter-Memory, Practice.Ed. Donald F.Bouchard.Cornell University Press.
[14] Bolter, J. )1993(”Hypertext and the Classical Commentary.”The University of Arizona Press. Tucson and London.
[15] Lanham, R. (1993) .the Electronic Word: Democracy, Technology, and the Arts.University of Chicago Press.Chicago and London.
[16] Joyce, M.(1988(.”Siren Shapes: Exploratory and Constructive Hypertext”. Academic Computing .London.
[17] Gerald, G. (1992). Beyond the Culture Wars: How Teaching the Conflicts Can Revitalize American Education. New York and London.
[18] Duncan, B. (1997). “Hypertext and Education (Post?) Dtructural Transformations”.Philosophy of Education.University of Illinois Press.
[19] Pagano, A.(1995) .”Matters of the Mind”.Critical Conversation in Philosophy of Education.ed.Wendy Kohli.Routledge.New York.
[20] Burbules, C and Callister, T .(1996(”Knowledge at the Crossroads: Some Alternative Futures of Hypertext Learning Environments.”Educational Theory.Vol.47.No.1.
[21] Whalley, P. (1990(. “Models of Hypertext Structure and Learning.”Designing Hypermedia for Learning.New York.
[22] Deleuze, G, and Guattari, F. (1987) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia.Trans.Brian Massumi.Minneapolis.University of Minnesota Press.
[23] Roy.C. (2003). Teacher in Nomadic Space: Deleuze and Curriculum.New York.