Study of Environmental Effects on Sunflower Oil Percent based on Graphical Method

Biplot can be used to evaluate cultivars for their oil percent potential and stability and to evaluate trial sites for their discriminating ability and representativeness. Multi-environmental trial (MET) data for oil percent of 10 open pollinating sunflower cultivars were analyzed to investigate the genotype-environment interactions. The genotypes were evaluated in four locations with different climatic conditions in Iran in 2010. In each location, a Randomized Complete Block design with four replications was used. According to both mean and stability, Zaria, Master and R453, had highest performances among all cultivars. The graphical analysis identified best cultivar for each environment. Cultivars Berezans and Record performed best in Khoy and Islamabad. Zaria and R453 were the best genotypes in Sari and Karaj followed by Master and Favorit. The GGE bi-plot indicated two mega-environments, group one contained Karaj, Khoy and Islamabad and the second group contained Sari. The best discriminating location was Karaj followed with Khoy, Islamabad and Sari. The best representative genotypes were Zaria, R453, Master and Favorit. Ranking of ten cultivars based their oil percent was as Zaria > R453 ≈ Master ≈ Favorit > Record ≈ Berezans > Sor > Lakumka > Bulg3 > Bulg5.




References:
[1] A. J. De la Vega, and S. C. Chapman. 2001. Genotype by environment
interaction and indirect selection for yield in sunflower. II. Three mode
principal component analysis of oil and biomass yield across
environments in Argentina. Field Crops Res., 72: 39-50.
[2] B. M. A. Salah and A. W. H. Abdella. 2009. Genetic yield stability in
some sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) hybrids under different
environmental conditions of Sudan. J. of Plant Breeding and Crop Sci.
1(1): pp. 016-021
[3] C. Gwanama., M. T. Labuschagne and A. M. Botha. 2000. Analysis of
genetic variation in Cucurbita moschata by random amplified
polymorphic DNA markers. Euphytica, 113: 19-24.
[4] I. A. Khan., B. A. Malik and M. Bashir. 1988. Investigation of genotype
X environment interaction for seed yield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum
L.). Pak. J. Bot., 20(2): 201-204.
[5] J. Anothai., A. Patanothai. K. Pannangpetch. S. Jogloy. K. J. Boote. G.
Hoogenboom. 2009. Multi-environment evaluation of peanut lines by
model simulation with the cultivar coefficients derived from a reduced
set of observed field data. Field Crops Research 110: 111 - 122.
[6] J. Crossa., P. L. Cornelius, and W. Yan. 2002. Biplots of linear -bilinear
models for studying crossover genotype × environment interaction. Crop
Science 42:136-144.
[7] K. Mostafavi, S. Hosseini Imeni, M. Zare. 2011. Stability Analysis of
Rice Genotypes Based GGE biplot Method in North of Iran. Journal of
Applied Sciences Research, 7(11): 1690-1694.
[8] K. R. Gabriel, 1971. The biplot graphical display of matrices with
applications to principal component analysis. Biometrica, 58: 453-467.
[9] P. M. Kroonenberg. 1995. Introduction to biplots for G×E tables,
University of Queensland, Brisbane.
[10] P. M. Kroonenberg. 1997. Introduction to biplots for GXE tables.
Research Report No. 51. Centre for statistics, the Uni. of Queensland,
Brisbane, Qld.
[11] W. Yan and L. A. Hunt. 2001. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial
data, In M. S. Kang, ed. Quantitative Genetics, Genomics and Plant
Breeding. CAB International, Willingford.
[12] W. Yan and M. S. Kang. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: a graphical tool for
breeders, In M. S. Kang, ed. Geneticists, and Agronomist. CRC Press,
Boca Raton, FL.
[13] W. Yan. 2002. Singular-value partitioning in biplot analysis of
multienvironment trial data. Agron. J. 94:990-996.
[14] W. Yan., L. A. Hunt, Q. Sheng, and Z. Szlavnics. 2000. Cultivar
evaluation and megaenvironment investigation based on the GGE
biplot. Crop Science 40:597-605.
[15] W. Yan., P. L. Cornelius., J. Crossa and L. A. Hunt. 2001. Two types of
GGE Biplots for Analysis Multi - Environment Trial Data. Crop Sci.
41: 565 - 663.