Parametric Non-Linear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Supplemental Damping Systems

This paper focuses on parametric analysis of reinforced concrete structures equipped with supplemental damping braces. Practitioners still luck sufficient data for current design of damper added structures and often reduce the real model to a pure damper braced structure even if this assumption is neither realistic nor conservative. In the present study, the damping brace is modelled as made by a linear supporting brace connected in series with the viscous/hysteretic damper. Deformation capacity of existing structures is usually not adequate to undergo the design earthquake. In spite of this, additional dampers could be introduced strongly limiting structural damage to acceptable values, or in some cases, reducing frame response to elastic behavior. This work is aimed at providing useful considerations for retrofit of existing buildings by means of supplemental damping braces. The study explicitly takes into consideration variability of (a) relative frame to supporting brace stiffness, (b) dampers’ coefficient (viscous coefficient or yielding force) and (c) non-linear frame behavior. Non-linear time history analysis has been run to account for both dampers’ behavior and non-linear plastic hinges modelled by Pivot hysteretic type. Parametric analysis based on previous studies on SDOF or MDOF linear frames provide reference values for nearly optimal damping systems design. With respect to bare frame configuration, seismic response of the damper-added frame is strongly improved, limiting deformations to acceptable values far below ultimate capacity. Results of the analysis also demonstrated the beneficial effect of stiffer supporting braces, thus highlighting inadequacy of simplified pure damper models. At the same time, the effect of variable damping coefficient and yielding force has to be treated as an optimization problem.





References:
[1] P. Castaldo, and M. De Iuliis, “Optimal integrated seismic design of structural and viscoelastic bracing-damper systems,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 43, 1809-1827, 2014.
[2] K. Fujita, A. Moustafa, and I. Takewaki, “Optimal placement of viscoelastic dampers and supporting members under variable critical excitation,” Earthquakes and Structures, 1 (1), 46-67, 2010.
[3] A. Habibi, R.W.K. Chan, and F. Albermani, “Energy-based design method for seismic retrofitting with passive energy dissipation systems,” Engineering Structures, 46, 77-86, 2013.
[4] J.H. Park, J. Kim, and K.W. Min, “Optimal design of added viscoelastic dampers and supporting braces,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 33, 465-484, 2004.
[5] E. Viola, and F. Guidi, “Influence of the supporting braces on the dynamic control of buildings with added viscous dampers,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 16, 267-286, 2009.
[6] D. Losanno, M. Spizzuoco, and G. Serino, “An optimal design procedure for a simple frame equipped with elastic-deformable dissipative braces,” Engineering Structures, 101, 677-697, 2015.
[7] D. Losanno, M. Spizzuoco, and G. Serino, “Optimal design of the seismic protection system for isolated bridges”, Earthquakes and Structures, 6, 969–999, 2014.
[8] I. Nuzzo, D. Losanno, G. Serino, L.M. Bozzo, "Simplified Nonlinear Analysis: Application to Damper-Braced Structures", in J. Kruis, Y. Tsompanakis, B.H.V. Topping, (Editors), "Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing", Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 123, 2015. doi:10.4203/ccp.108.123.
[9] M. Palermo, S. Silvestri, T. Trombetti, L. Landi “Force reduction factor for building structures equipped with added viscous dampers,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 11, 1661-1681, 2013.
[10] NTC, “Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni”, DM 14 gennaio 2008, Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 29 del 4 febbraio 2008 – Supplemento Ordinario n. 30, Italy, 2008.
[11] CIRCOLARE 2 febbraio 2009 , n. 617 “Istruzioni per l'applicazione delle «Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni» di cui al decreto ministeriale 14 gennaio 2008”, Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 47 del 26 febbraio 2009 – Supplemento Ordinario n. 27, Italy, 2009.
[12] R.K. Dowell, F. Seible, E. Wilson, “Pivot Hysteresis Model for Reinfoirced Concrete Members”, ACI Structural Journal 95,5, 607-617,1998.
[13] “Pivot Hysteresis Model”, http://docs.csiamerica.com/help-files/etabs/Menus/Assign/Pivot_Hysteresis_Model.htm, 2017.
[14] A.W.Taylor, C.Kuo, K.Wellwnius, D.Chung, “A Summary of Cyclic Lateral Loads Tests on Rectangular Reinforced Concrete Columns”, Building and Fire Research Laboratory; National Institute of Standards and Technology; Gaithersburg, Maryland; 1997.
[15] I. Iervolino, C. Galasso, and E. Cosenza, “REXEL: computer aided record selection for code–based seismic structural analysis”, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8 (2), 399-362, 2010.
[16] D. Losanno, M. Spizzuoco, and G. Serino, “Design and retrofit of multi-story frames with elastic-deformable viscous damping braces”, Journal of Eartquakes Engineering, in review.